14.08.2013 Views

TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...

TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...

TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.3. Quadratic dimension of quadratic Lie algebras<br />

2.3.2 Quadratic dimension of reduced singular quadratic Lie algebras<br />

and the invariance of dup number<br />

Proposition 2.3.6. Let g be a reduced singular quadratic Lie algebra and D ∈ L (g) be a<br />

symmetric map. Then:<br />

(1) D is a centromorphism if and only if there exist µ ∈ C and a symmetric map Z : g → Z(g)<br />

such that Z| [g,g] = 0 and D = µ Id+Z. Moreover D is invertible if and only if µ = 0.<br />

(2)<br />

Proof.<br />

dq(g) = 1 +<br />

dim(Z(g))(1 + dim(Z(g))<br />

.<br />

2<br />

(1) If g = o(3), with B = λκ and κ the Killing form, the two results are obvious. So, we<br />

examine the case where g is solvable, and then g can be realized as a double extension:<br />

g = (CX1 ⊕ CY1) ⊥<br />

⊕ q, with corresponding bilinear form B on q, C = ad(Y1), C = C|q ∈<br />

o(q).<br />

Let D be an invertible centromorphism. One has D ◦ ad(X) = ad(X) ◦ D, for all X ∈ g<br />

and that implies DC = CD. Using formula (1) of Lemma 2.2.27 and CD = DC, from<br />

[D(X),Y1] = [X,D(Y1)], we find D(C(X)) = B(D(X1),Y1)C(X). Let µ = B(D(X1),Y1).<br />

Since D is invertible, one has µ = 0 and C(D− µ Id) = 0. Since ker(C) = CX1 ⊕ker(C)⊕<br />

CY1 = Z(g) ⊕ CY1, there exists a map Z : g → Z(g) and ϕ ∈ g ∗ such that D − µ Id =<br />

Z + ϕ ⊗Y1. But D maps [g,g] into itself, so ϕ| [g,g] = 0. One has [g,g] = CX1 ⊕ Im(C).<br />

If X ∈ Im(C), let X = C(Y ). Then D(X) = D(C(Y )) = µC(Y ), so D(X) = µX. For<br />

Y1, D([Y1,X]) = DC(X) = µC(X) for all X ∈ g. But also, D([Y1,X]) = [D(Y1),X] =<br />

µC(X) + ϕ(Y1)C(X), hence ϕ(Y1) = 0.<br />

Assume we have shown that D(X1) = µX1. Then if X ∈ q, B(D(X1),X) = µB(X1,X) = 0.<br />

Moreover, B(D(X1),X) = B(X1,D(X)), so ϕ(X) = 0. Thus, to prove (1), we must prove<br />

that D(X1) = µX1. We decompose q respectively to C as in Appendix A. Let l = ker(C).<br />

Then:<br />

q = (l ⊕ l ′ ) ⊥<br />

⊕ (u ⊕ u ′ )<br />

⊥<br />

and C is an isomorphism from l ′ ⊕ (u ⊕ u ′ ) onto l ⊥<br />

⊕ (u ⊕ u ′ ). Or<br />

q = (l + l ′ ) ⊥<br />

⊕ CT ⊥<br />

⊕ (u ⊕ u ′ )<br />

⊥<br />

and C is an isomorphism from l ′ ⊕ CT ⊥<br />

⊕ (u ⊕ u ′ ) onto l ⊥<br />

⊕ CT ⊥<br />

⊕ (u ⊕ u ′ ).<br />

If u⊕u ′ = {0}, there exist X ′ , Y ′ ∈ u⊕u ′ such that B(X ′ ,Y ′ ⊥<br />

) = −1 and X, Y ∈ l ′ ⊕ (u⊕u ′ )<br />

⊥<br />

(resp. l ′ ⊕ CT ⊥<br />

⊕ (u⊕u ′ )) such that X ′ = C(X), Y ′ = C(Y ). It follows that [C(X),Y ] = X1<br />

and then D(X1) = [DC(X),Y ] = µ[C(X),Y ] = µX1.<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!