14.08.2013 Views

TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...

TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...

TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(2) g g ′ if and only if g i g ′ .<br />

2.2. Singular quadratic Lie algebras<br />

Proof. We assume that g g ′ . Then by Corollary 2.2.31, there exists an invertible P : q → q ′<br />

and a non-zero λ ∈ C such that C ′ = λ P C P −1 , so q ′ N = P(qN) and q ′ I = P(qI), then dim(q ′ N ) =<br />

dim(qN) and dim(q ′ I ) = dim(qI). Thus, there exist isometries FN : q ′ N → qN and FI : q ′ I → qI and<br />

we can define an isometry F : q ′ → q by F(X ′ N + X ′ I ) = FN(X ′ N ) + FI(X ′ I ), for all X ′ N ∈ q′ N and<br />

X ′ I ∈ q′ I . We now define F : g′ → g by F(X ′ 1 ) = X1, F(Y ′ 1 ) = Y1, F| q ′ = F and a new Lie bracket<br />

on g :<br />

[X,Y ] ′′ = F [F −1 (X),F −1 (Y )] ′ , ∀ X,Y ∈ g.<br />

Call g ′′ this new quadratic Lie algebra. We have g ′′ = (CX1 ⊕ CY1) ⊥<br />

⊕ q, i.e., q ′′ = q and<br />

C ′′ = F C ′ F −1 . So q ′′ N = F(q′ N ) = qN and q ′′<br />

I = F(q′ I ) = qI. But g g ′′ , so there exists an<br />

invertible Q : q → q such that C ′′ = λ Q C Q −1 for some non-zero λ ∈ C (Corollary 2.2.31). It<br />

follows that q ′′ N = Q(qN) and q ′′<br />

I = Q(qI), so Q(qN) = qN and Q(qI) = qI.<br />

Moreover, we have Q ∗ Q C = C (Corollary 2.2.31), so Q ∗ Q C k = C k for all k. There exists k<br />

such that qI = Im(C k ) and (Q ∗ Q C k )(X) = C k (X), for all X ∈ g. So Q ∗ Q|qI = IdqI and QI = Q|qI<br />

is an isometry. Since C ′′<br />

I = λ Q I CI Q −1<br />

I , then gI<br />

i<br />

g ′′<br />

I (Corollary 2.2.31).<br />

Let QN = Q|qN . Then C′′ N = λ QN CN Q −1<br />

N and Q∗ N QN CN = CN, so by Corollary 2.2.31,<br />

gN g ′′ N . Since gN and g ′′ N are nilpotent, then g′′ i<br />

N gN by Theorem 2.2.37.<br />

Conversely, assume that gN g ′ N and gI g ′ I . Then gN<br />

i<br />

g ′ N and gI<br />

i<br />

g ′ I by Theorem 2.2.37<br />

and Lemma 2.2.42.<br />

So, there exist isometries PN : gN → g ′ N , PI : gI → g ′ I and non-zero λN and λI ∈ C such that<br />

C ′<br />

N = λN PN CN P −1<br />

N and C ′<br />

I = λI PI CI P −1<br />

I . By Lemma 2.2.36, since gN and g ′ N are nilpotent,<br />

we can assume that λN = λI = λ. Now we define P : q → q ′ by P(XN + XI) = PN(XN) + PI(XI),<br />

for all XN ∈ qN, XI ∈ qI, so P is an isometry. Moreover, since C(XN + XI) = CN(XN) +CI(XI),<br />

for all XN ∈ qN, XI ∈ qI and C ′ (X ′ N + X ′ I ) = C′ N(X ′ N ) + C′ I(X ′ I ), for all X ′ N ∈ qN, X ′ I ∈ qI, we<br />

conclude C ′ = λ P CP−1 and finally, g i g ′ , by Corollary 2.2.31.<br />

Remark 2.2.53. The class of solvable singular quadratic Lie algebras has the remarkable property<br />

that two Lie algebras in this class are isomorphic if and only if they are i-isomorphic. In<br />

addition, the Fitting components do not depend on the realizations of the Lie algebra as a double<br />

extension and they completely characterize the Lie algebra (up to isomorphisms).<br />

It results that the classfification of Ss(n + 2) can be reduced from the classification of O(n)orbits<br />

of o(n) in Chapter 1. We set an action of the group C ∗ on D(n) by:<br />

µ · ([d],T ) = ([d], µ · T ) , ∀ µ ∈ C ∗ , ([d],T ) ∈ D(n).<br />

Then, we have the classification result of Ss(n + 2) as follows:<br />

Theorem 2.2.54. The set Ss(n + 2) is in bijection with D(n)/C ∗ .<br />

Proof. By Theorems 2.2.35 and 2.2.52, there is a bijection between Ss(n + 2) and <br />

P 1 (o(n)). It<br />

needs only to show that there is a bijection between <br />

P 1 (o(n)) and D(n)/C ∗ . Let C ∈ o(n) then<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!