14.08.2013 Views

TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...

TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...

TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.2. Singular quadratic Lie algebras<br />

Denote by Sinv(2p + 2) the set of invertible singular quadratic Lie algebra structures on<br />

C2p+2 , by Sinv(2p + 2) the set of isomorphism (or i-isomorphism) classes of Sinv(2p + 2). The<br />

classification of Sinv(2p + 2) can be deduced from the classification of the set of orbits I (2p)<br />

by Jp as follows (see Chapter 1): introduce an action of the multiplicative group C ∗ = C\{0}<br />

on Jp by<br />

for all µ ∈ C ∗ , µ · (Λ,m,d) = (µΛ,m ′ ,d ′ ), ∀ (Λ,m,d) ∈ Jp,λ ∈ Λ,<br />

where m ′ (µλ) = m(λ),d ′ (µλ) = d(λ), for all λ ∈ Λ. Since i(µC) = µi(C), for all C ∈ I (2p)<br />

and µ ∈ C∗ where i : I (2p) → Jp the bijection is defined as in Chapter 1, then there is a<br />

bijection i : P1 ( I (2p)) → Jp/C∗ given by i([C]) = [i(C)], if [C] is the class of C ∈ I (2p) and<br />

[(Λ,m,d)] is the class of (Λ,m,d) ∈ Jp.<br />

Theorem 2.2.50. The set Sinv(2p + 2) is in bijection with Jp/C ∗ .<br />

Proof. By Theorem 2.2.35, there is a bijection between i<br />

Ss (2p + 2) and <br />

P1 (o(2p)). By restriction,<br />

that induces a bijection between i<br />

Sinv (2p+2) and P1 (I (2p)).<br />

By Lemma 2.2.42, we have<br />

i<br />

Sinv (2p + 2) = Sinv(2p + 2). Then, the result follows: given g ∈ Sinv(2p + 2) and an associated<br />

C ∈ I (2p), the bijection maps g to [i(C)] where g is the isomorphism class of g.<br />

Let g be a solvable singular quadratic Lie algebra. We fix a realization of g as a double<br />

extension, g = (CX0 ⊕ CY0) ⊥<br />

⊕ q (Proposition 2.2.28 and Lemma 2.2.34). Let C = ad(Y0), C =<br />

C|q and B = B|q×q. We consider the Fitting decomposition of C:<br />

q = qN ⊕ qI,<br />

where qN and qI are C-stable, CN = C|qN is nilpotent and CI = C|qI is invertible.<br />

We recall the facts in Section 1.5, one has qI = q⊥ N , the restrictions BN = B|qN×qN and BI =<br />

B|qI×qI are non-degenerate, CN and CI are skew-symmetric and [qI,qN] = 0. Let gN = (CX0 ⊕<br />

CY0) ⊥<br />

⊕ qN and gI = (CX0 ⊕ CY0) ⊥<br />

⊕ qI. Then gN and gI are Lie subalgebras of g, gN is the<br />

double extension of qN by CN, gI is the double extension of qI by CI and gN is a nilpotent<br />

singular quadratic Lie algebra. Moreover, we have<br />

g = gN × a gI.<br />

Definition 2.2.51. The Lie subalgebras gN and gI are respectively the nilpotent and invertible<br />

Fitting components of g.<br />

This definition is justified by:<br />

Theorem 2.2.52. Let g and g ′ be solvable singular quadratic Lie algebras and gN, gI, g ′ N , g′ I<br />

be their Fitting components. Then<br />

(1) g i g ′ if and only if gN<br />

i<br />

g ′ N and gI<br />

i<br />

g ′ I . The result remains valid if we replace i by .<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!