14.08.2013 Views

TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...

TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...

TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.2. Singular quadratic Lie algebras<br />

Keep the notations as in Chapter 1. To describe the set of semisimple O(n)-orbits in<br />

P 1 (o(n)), we need to add maps (λ1,...,λp) ↦→ λ(λ1,...,λp), for all λ ∈ C, λ = 0 to the group<br />

Gp. We obtain a group denoted by Hp. As a consequence of Section 1.3, we have the classification<br />

result for the diagonalizable case:<br />

Theorem 2.2.41. There is a bijection between Di (n+2) and Λp/Hp with n = 2p or n = 2p+1.<br />

Moreover, if n = 2p + 1, Di red (n + 2) = /0 and if n = 2p, then Di red (2p + 2) is in bijection with<br />

Λ + p /Hp where Λ + p = {(λ1,...,λp) | λi ∈ C,λi = 0, ∀ i }.<br />

To go further in the study of diagonalizable reduced case, we need the following Lemma:<br />

Lemma 2.2.42.<br />

Let g ′ and g ′′ be solvable singular quadratic Lie algebras, g ′ = (CX ′ 1 ⊕ CY ′ 1<br />

) ⊥<br />

⊕ q ′ a decom-<br />

position of g ′ as a double extension and C ′ = ad(Y ′ 1 )| q ′. We assume that C′ is invertible. Then g ′<br />

and g ′′ are isomorphic if and only if they are i-isomorphic.<br />

Proof. Write g ′′ = (CX ′′<br />

⊥<br />

1 ⊕ CY ′′<br />

1 ) ⊕ q ′′ a decomposition of g ′′ as a double extension and C ′′ =<br />

ad(Y ′′<br />

1 )| q ′′.<br />

Assume that g ′ and g ′′ are isomorphic. By Corollary 2.2.31, there exist Q : q ′ → q ′′ and<br />

P ∈ L (q ′ ) such that Q P −1 is an isometry, P ∗ P C ′ = C ′ and C ′′ = λ Q C ′ Q −1 for some nonzero<br />

λ ∈ C. But C ′ is invertible, so P ∗ P = Idq ′. Therefore, P is an isometry of q ′ and then Q is<br />

an isometry from q ′ to q ′′ . The conditions of Corollary 2.2.31 (1) are satisfied, so g ′ and g ′′ are<br />

i-isomorphic.<br />

Corollary 2.2.43. One has:<br />

Dred(2p + 2) = D i red (2p + 2), ∀ p ≥ 1.<br />

Next, we describe diagonalizable reduced singular quadratic Lie algebras using the amalgamated<br />

products. First, let g4(λ) be the double extension of q = C2 <br />

λ 0<br />

by C = , λ = 0.<br />

0 −λ<br />

By Lemma 2.2.27, g4(λ) is i-isomorphic to g4(1), call it g4.<br />

Proposition 2.2.44. Let (g,B) be a diagonalizable reduced singular quadratic Lie algebra.<br />

Then g is an amalgamated product of singular quadratic Lie algebras all i-isomorphic to g4.<br />

Proof. We write g = (CX0 ⊕CY0) ⊥<br />

⊕ q, C = ad(Y0), C =C|q and B = Bq×q. Then C is a diagonalizable<br />

invertible element of o(q,B). Apply Appendix A to obtain a basis {e1,...,ep, f1,..., fp}<br />

of q and λ1,...,λp ∈ C, all non-zero, such that B(ei,ej) = B( fi, f j) = 0, B(ei, f j) = δi j and<br />

C(ei) = λiei, C( fi) = −λi fi, for all 1 ≤ i, j ≤ p. Let qi = span{ei, fi}, 1 ≤ i ≤ p. Then<br />

q = ⊥<br />

⊕ qi.<br />

1≤i≤p<br />

Furthermore, hi = (CX0 ⊕ CY0) ⊥<br />

⊕ qi is a Lie subalgebra of g for all 1 ≤ i ≤ p and<br />

g = h1 × a h2 × a ... × a hp with hi<br />

42<br />

i<br />

g4(λi) i g4.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!