TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...
TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...
TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2.2. Singular quadratic Lie algebras<br />
Therefore, we can conclude that all solvable quadratic Lie algebras of type S3 are double<br />
extensions of a quadratic vector space by a skew-symmetric map.<br />
We remark that in the nilpotent Lie algebras classification, the Lie algebras g5 and g6 can be<br />
identified respectively as g5,4 and g6,4, for more details the reader should refer to [Oom09] and<br />
[Mag10].<br />
2.2.5 Classification singular quadratic Lie algebras<br />
Let (q,B) be a quadratic vector space. We recall the notations in Chapter 1 that O(q) is the<br />
group of orthogonal maps and o(q) is its Lie algebra, i.e. the Lie algebra of skew-symmetric<br />
maps. Also, recall that the adjoint action is the action of O(q) on o(q) by conjugation.<br />
Theorem 2.2.30. Let (q,B) be a quadratic vector space. Let g = (CX1 ⊕ CY1) ⊥<br />
⊕ q and g ′ =<br />
(CX ′ 1 ⊕ CY ′ ⊥<br />
1 ) ⊕ q be double extensions of q, by nonzero skew-symmetric maps C and C ′ respectively.<br />
Then:<br />
(1) there exists a Lie algebra isomorphism between g and g ′ if and only if there exist an<br />
invertible map P ∈ L (q) and a non-zero λ ∈ C such that C ′ = λ PCP −1 and P ∗ PC = C<br />
where P ∗ is the adjoint map of P with respect to B.<br />
(2) there exists an i-isomorphism between g and g ′ if and only if C ′ is in the O(q)-adjoint<br />
orbit through λC for some non-zero λ ∈ C.<br />
Proof.<br />
(1) Let A : g → g ′ be a Lie algebra isomorphism. We know by Proposition 2.2.28 that g and<br />
g ′ are singular. Assume that g is of type S3. Then 3 = dim([g,g]) = dim([g ′ ,g ′ ]). So g ′<br />
is also of type S3 ([PU07]). Therefore, g and g ′ are either both of type S1 or both of type<br />
S3. Let us study these two cases.<br />
(i) First, assume that g and g ′ are both of type S1. We start by proving that A(CX1 ⊕q) =<br />
CX ′ 1 ⊕ q. If this is not the case, there is X ∈ q such that A(X) = βX ′ 1 + γY ′ 1 +Y with<br />
Y ∈ q and γ = 0. Then<br />
[A(X),CX ′ 1 ⊕ q] ′ = γC ′ (q) + [Y,q] ′ .<br />
Since g ′ is of type S1, we have rank(C ′ ) ≥ 4 (see Proposition 2.2.28) and it follows<br />
that dim([A(X),CX ′ 1 ⊕ q]′ ) ≥ 4. On the other hand, [A(X),CX ′ 1 ⊕ q]′ is contained in<br />
A([X,g]) and dim([X,g]) ≤ 2, so we obtain a contradiction.<br />
Next, we prove that A(X1) ∈ CX ′ 1 . By the definition of a double extension and B<br />
non-degenerate, then there exist X, Y ∈ q such that X1 = [X,Y ]. Then A(X1) =<br />
[A(X),A(Y )] ′ ∈ [CX ′ 1 ⊕ q,CX ′ 1 ⊕ q]′ = CX ′ 1 . Hence A(X1) = µX ′ 1 for some non-zero<br />
µ ∈ C.<br />
Now, write A|q = P + β ⊗ X ′ 1 with P : q → q and β ∈ q∗ <br />
. If X ∈ ker(P), then<br />
A X − 1<br />
µ β(X)X1<br />
<br />
= 0, so X = 0 and therefore, P is invertible.<br />
36