14.08.2013 Views

TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...

TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...

TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.1. Preliminaries<br />

Corollary 2.1.6. Let (g,B) be a non-Abelian solvable quadratic Lie algebra. Then there exists<br />

a central element X of g such that X is isotropic.<br />

Proof. By the above proposition, g can be decomposed by g = z ⊥<br />

⊕ l where l is non-Abelian and<br />

Z(l) is totally isotropic. Since g is solvable then l is solvable. Moreover, l is a quadratic Lie<br />

algebra then Z(l) = 0 and the result follows.<br />

Definition 2.1.7. A quadratic Lie algebra g is reduced if:<br />

(1) g = {0}<br />

(2) Z(g) is totally isotropic.<br />

Notice that a reduced quadratic Lie algebra is necessarily non-Abelian.<br />

Definition 2.1.8. Let (g,B) be a quadratic Lie algebra and C be an endomorphism of g. We say<br />

that C is skew-symmetric (or B-antisymmetric) if B(C(X),Y ) = −B(X,C(Y )), for all X,Y ∈ g.<br />

Denote by Enda(g) (resp. Dera(g)) space of skew-symmetric endomorphisms (resp. derivations)<br />

of g.<br />

Next, we recall two effective methods to construct quadratic Lie algebras: double extensions<br />

and T ∗ -extensions. The former method is initiated by V. Kac for the solvable case ([Kac85] and<br />

[FS87]), after that developed generally by A. Medina and Ph. Revoy [MR85]; the later is given<br />

by M. Bordemann [Bor97].<br />

Definition 2.1.9. Let (g,B) be a quadratic Lie algebra, h be another Lie algebra and π : h →<br />

Dera(g) be a representation of h by means of skew-symmetric derivations of g. Define the map<br />

ϕ : g×g → h ∗ by ϕ(X,Y )Z = B(π(Z)X,Y ), for all X,Y ∈ g, Z ∈ h. Denote by ad ∗ the coadjoint<br />

representation of h. Then the vector space g = h ⊕ g ⊕ h ∗ with the product:<br />

[X +Y + f ,X ′ +Y ′ + f ′ ] = [X,X ′ ]h + [Y,Y ′ ]g + π(X)Y ′ − π(X ′ )Y + ad ∗ (X) f ′<br />

−ad ∗ (X ′ ) f + ϕ(Y,Y ′ )<br />

for all X,X ′ ∈ h, Y,Y ′ ∈ g, f , f ′ ∈ h ∗ is a Lie algebra and it is called the double extension of g by<br />

h by means of π. It is easy to show that g is also a quadratic Lie algebra with the bilinear form<br />

B defined by:<br />

B(X +Y + f ,X ′ +Y ′ + f ′ ) = B(Y,Y ′ ) + f (X ′ ) + f ′ (X)<br />

for all X,X ′ ∈ h, Y,Y ′ ∈ g, f , f ′ ∈ h ∗ .<br />

If there is an invariant symmetric bilinear form γ on h (not necessarily non-degenerate) then<br />

g is also a quadratic Lie algebra with the bilinear form Bγ as follows:<br />

Bγ(X +Y + f ,X ′ +Y ′ + f ′ ) = B(Y,Y ′ ) + γ(X,X ′ ) + f (X ′ ) + f ′ (X)<br />

for all X,X ′ ∈ h, Y,Y ′ ∈ g, f , f ′ ∈ h ∗ .<br />

Proposition 2.1.10. ([Kac85], 2.11, [MR85], Theorem I)<br />

Let (g,B) be an indecomposable quadratic Lie algebra (see Definition 2.2.17) such that it is<br />

not simple nor one-dimensional. Then g is the double extension of a quadratic Lie algebra by a<br />

simple or one-dimensional algebra.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!