TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...
TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...
TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Appendix B<br />
Here we prove:<br />
Lemma B.1. Let (g,B) be a non-Abelian 5-dimensional quadratic Lie algebra. Then g is a<br />
singular quadratic Lie algebra.<br />
Proof.<br />
• We assume g is not solvable and then we write g = s ⊕ r where s is semisimple and r is<br />
the radical of g [Bou71]. Then s sl(2) and B|s×s = λκ where κ is the Killing form.<br />
If λ = 0, consider Ψ : s → r ∗ defined by Ψ(S)(R) = B(S,R), for all S ∈ s, R ∈ r. Then<br />
Ψ is one-to-one and Ψ(ad(X)(S)) = ad ∗ (X)(ψ(S)), for all X, S ∈ s. So Ψ must be a<br />
homomorphism from the representation (s,ad|s) of s into the representation (r ∗ ,ad ∗ |s),<br />
so Ψ = 0, a contradiction.<br />
So λ = 0. Then B|s×s is non-degenerate. Therefore g = s ⊥<br />
⊕ s⊥ and ad(s)| s⊥ is an orthogonal<br />
2-dimensional representation of s. Hence, ad(s)| s⊥ = 0 and [s,s⊥ ] = 0. We<br />
have B(X,[Y,Z]) = B([X,Y ],Z) = 0, for all X ∈ s, Y ∈ s⊥ , Z ∈ g. It follows that s⊥ is an<br />
ideal of g and therefore a quadratic 2-dimensional Lie algebra. So s⊥ is Abelian. Finally,<br />
g = s ⊥<br />
⊕ s⊥ with s⊥ a central ideal of g, so dup(g) = dup(s) = 3.<br />
• We assume that g is solvable and we write g = l ⊥<br />
⊕ z with z a central ideal of g (Proposition<br />
2.1.5). Then dim(l) ≥ 3. If dim(l) = 3 or 4, then it is proved in Proposition 2.2.15 that l is<br />
singular, so g is singular. So we can assume that g is reduced, i.e. Z(g) ⊂ [g,g]. It results<br />
that dim(Z(g)) = 1 or 2 (Proposition 2.1.5 (3) and Remark 2.2.10).<br />
– If dim(Z(g)) = 1, Z(g) = CX0. Then dim([g,g]) = 4 and [g,g] = X ⊥ 0<br />
. We can<br />
choose Y0 such that B(X0,Y0) = 1 and B(Y0,Y0) = 0. Let q = (CX0 ⊕ CY0) ⊥ . Then<br />
g = (CX0 ⊕ CY0) ⊥<br />
⊕ q. If X, X ′ ∈ q, then B(X0,[X,X ′ ]) = B([X0,X],X ′ ) = 0, so<br />
[X,X ′ ] ∈ X ⊥ 0 . Write [X,X ′ ] = λ(X,X ′ )X0 + [X,X ′ ]q with [X,X ′ ]q ∈ q. Remark that<br />
[X,[X ′ ,X ′′ ]] = λ(X,[X ′ ,X ′′ ]q)X0 + [X,[X ′ ,X ′′ ]q]q, for all X, X ′ , X ′′ ∈ q. So [·,·]q<br />
satisfies the Jacobi identity. Moreover B([X,X ′ ],X ′′ ) = −B(X ′ ,[X,X ′′ ]q). But also<br />
B([X,X ′ ],X ′′ ) = B([X,X ′ ]q,X ′′ ). So (q,[·,·]q,B|q×q) is a 3-dimensional quadratic<br />
Lie algebra.<br />
If q is an Abelian Lie algebra, then [X,X ′ ] ∈ CX0, for all X, X ′ ∈ q. Write B(Y0,[X,X ′ ])<br />
= B([Y0,X],X ′ ) to obtain [X,X ′ ] = B(ad(Y0)(X),X ′ )X0, for all X, X ′ ∈ q. Since<br />
133