14.08.2013 Views

TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...

TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...

TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.2. Jordanian double extension of a quadratic vector space<br />

Proof. Assume J and J ′ isomorphic by A. First, we will show that A(q ⊕ Cx1) = q ⊕ Cx ′ 1 .<br />

Indeed, if A(x1) = y + βx ′ 1 + γy′ 1 where y ∈ q,β,γ ∈ C, then<br />

0 = A(x 2 1) = A(x1)A(x1) = 2γC ′ (y) + (2βγ + B(C ′ (y),y))x ′ 1 + γ 2 y ′ 1.<br />

Therefore, γ = 0. Similarly, if there exists x ∈ q such that A(x) = z + αx ′ 1 + δy′ 1 where z ∈<br />

q,α,δ ∈ C. Then<br />

B(C(x),x)A(x1) = A(x 2 ) = A(x)A(x) = 2δC ′ (z) + (2αδ + B(C ′ (z),z))x ′ 1 + δ 2 y ′ 1.<br />

That implies δ = 0 and A(q ⊕ Cx1) = q ⊕ Cx ′ 1 .<br />

The rest of the proof follows exactly the proof of Theorem 4.2.5, one has A(x1) = µx ′ 1 for<br />

some non-zero µ ∈ C and there is an isomorphism of q such that A|q = P+β ⊗x ′ 1 where β ∈ q∗ .<br />

Similarly as in the proof of Theorem 4.2.5, one also has P ∗ C ′ P = µC, where P ∗ is the adjoint<br />

map of P with respect to B. Assume that A(y1) = λy ′ 1 +y+δx′ 1 . Since A(y1)A(y1) = A(y1), one<br />

has λ = 1 and therefore C ′ = PCP −1 . Replace P by<br />

1<br />

(µ) 1 2<br />

P to get P ∗ PC = C. However, since C<br />

is invertible then P∗P = I. It means that P is an isometry of q.<br />

Conversely, define A : J → J ′ by A(x1) = x ′ 1 , A(y1) = y ′ 1 and A(x) = P(x), for all x ∈ q then<br />

A is an i-isomorphism.<br />

An invertible symmetric endomorphism of q satisfying 3C − 2C2 = Id is diagonalizable by<br />

an orthogonal basis of eigenvectors with eigenvalues 1 and 1 2 (see Appendix D). Therefore, we<br />

have the following corollary:<br />

Corollary 4.2.9. Let (q,B) be a quadratic vector space and let J = q ⊥<br />

⊕ (Cx1 ⊕ Cy1) and<br />

J ′ = q ⊥<br />

⊕ (Cx ′ 1 ⊕ Cy′ 1<br />

respectively. Then J and J ′ are isomorphic if and only if C and C ′ have the same spectrum.<br />

) be diagonalizable double extensions of q, by invertible maps C and C′<br />

Example 4.2.10. Let Cx be a one-dimensional Abelian algebra. Let J = Cx ⊥<br />

⊕ (Cx1 ⊕Cy1) and<br />

⊕ (Cx ′ 1 ⊕ Cy′ 1 ) be diagonalizable double extensions of Cx by C = Id and C = 1 2 Id. In<br />

particular, the product on J and J ′ are defined by:<br />

J ′ = Cx ⊥<br />

y 2 1 = y1,y1x = x,y1x1 = x1,x 2 = x1;<br />

(y ′ 1) 2 = y ′ 1,y ′ 1x = 1<br />

2 x,y1x1 = x1,x 2 = 1<br />

2 x1.<br />

Then J and J ′ are not isomorphic. Moreover, J ′ has no unit element.<br />

Remark 4.2.11. The i-isomorphic and isomorphic notions are not coinciding in general. For<br />

example, the Jordan algebras J = Ce with e 2 = e, B(e,e) = 1 and J ′ = Ce ′ with (e ′ ) 2 = e ′ ,<br />

B(e ′ ,e ′ ) = a = 1 are isomorphic but not i-isomorphic.<br />

107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!