14.08.2013 Views

TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...

TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...

TH`ESE A NEW INVARIANT OF QUADRATIC LIE ALGEBRAS AND ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.5. Singular quadratic Lie superalgebras of type S1 with non-Abelian even part<br />

3.5 Singular quadratic Lie superalgebras of type S1 with non-<br />

Abelian even part<br />

Let g be a singular quadratic Lie superalgebra of type S1 such that g 0 is non-Abelian. If<br />

[g 1,g 1] = {0} then g is an orthogonal direct sum of a singular quadratic Lie algebra of type S1<br />

and a vector space. There is nothing to do. Therefore, we can assume that [g 1,g 1] = {0}. Fix<br />

α ∈ VI and choose Ω0 ∈ A 2 (g 0), Ω1 ∈ S 2 (g 1) such that<br />

I = α ∧ Ω0 + α ⊗ Ω1.<br />

Let X 0 = φ −1 (α) then X 0 ∈ Z(g) and B(X 0,X 0) = 0. We define the maps C0 : g 0 → g 0,<br />

C1 : g 1 → g 1 by Ω0(X,Y ) = B(C0(X),Y ), for all X,Y ∈ g 0 and Ω1(X,Y ) = B(C1(X),Y ), for all<br />

X,Y ∈ g 1. Let C : g → g defined by C(X +Y ) = C0(X) +C1(Y ), for all X ∈ g 0, Y ∈ g 1.<br />

Proposition 3.5.1. For all X,Y ∈ g, the Lie super-bracket of g is defined by:<br />

[X,Y ] = B(X 0,X)C(Y ) − B(X 0,Y )C(X) + B(C(X),Y )X 0.<br />

In particular, if X,Y ∈ g 0, Z,T ∈ g 1 then<br />

(1) [X,Y ] = B(X 0,X)C0(Y ) − B(X 0,Y )C0(X) + B(C0(X),Y )X 0,<br />

(2) [X,Z] = B(X 0,X)C1(Z),<br />

(3) [Z,T ] = B(C1(Z),T )X 0<br />

Proof. For all X,Y,T ∈ g 0, since B([Y,Z],T ) = α ∧ Ω0(X,Y,Z) then one has (1) as in Chapter<br />

2. For all X ∈ g 0, Y,Z ∈ g 1<br />

B([X,Y ],Z) = α ⊗ Ω1(X,Y,Z) = α(X)Ω1(Y,Z) = B(X 0,X)B(C1(Y ),Z).<br />

Hence we obtain (2) and (3).<br />

Now, we show that g 0 is solvable. Consider the quadratic Lie algebra g 0 with 3-form I0 =<br />

α ∧ Ω0. Write Ω0 = ∑i< j ai jαi ∧ α j, with ai j ∈ C. Set Xi = φ −1 (αi) then<br />

Recall the space WI0 in Chapter 2 as follows:<br />

C0 = ∑ ai j(αi ⊗ Xj − α j ⊗ Xi).<br />

i< j<br />

WI0 = {ιX∧Y (I0) | X,Y ∈ g 0}.<br />

Since WI0 = φ([g 0,g 0]) one has Im(C0) ⊂ [g 0,g 0]. In Section 3.2, it is known that {α,I0} = 0<br />

and then [X 0,g 0] = 0. As a sequence, B(X 0,[g 0,g 0]). That deduces B(X 0,Im(C0)) = 0. Therefore<br />

[[g 0,g 0],[g 0,g 0]] = [Im(C0),Im(C0)] ⊂ CX 0 and then g 0 is solvable.<br />

Since B is non-degenerate then we can choose Y 0 ∈ g 0 isotropic such that B(X 0,Y 0) = 1 as in<br />

Chapter 2 to obtain a straightforward consequence as follows:<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!