14.08.2013 Views

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C.II EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSES OF THE IMPACTS OF TEMPORARY<br />

GRASSLANDS ON WEED POPULATIONS<br />

This second empirical chapter of the thesis has not been submitted for publication so far. The<br />

current status of this chapter is ‘article in preparation’. The chapter is presented as one single<br />

text to avoid redundancies, but it will later probably be divi<strong>de</strong>d into two articles.<br />

Manuscript 3:<br />

H Meiss, R Waldhardt, J Caneill, N Munier-Jolain (in preparation)<br />

Mechanisms affecting population dynamics of weeds in perennial forage <strong>crop</strong>s.<br />

Abstract<br />

Perennial forage <strong>crop</strong>s may have very strong impacts on weed communities, as suggested by<br />

weed surveys on commercial fields and field experiments. However, little is known about the<br />

mechanisms causing such impacts and many previous studies confoun<strong>de</strong>d the <strong>crop</strong> treatments<br />

<strong>with</strong> herbici<strong>de</strong> treatments. In a 2.5-years field experiment, population dynamics of 16<br />

artificially sown and other naturally occurring weed species were compared between perennial<br />

forage <strong>crop</strong>s and a succession of annual cereal <strong>crop</strong>s both <strong>with</strong> contrasted management options<br />

but always <strong>with</strong>out herbici<strong>de</strong>s. Perennial <strong>crop</strong>s differed by <strong>crop</strong> species (Medicago sativa vs.<br />

Dactylis glomerata), sowing season (autumn vs. spring) and cutting frequency (3 vs. 5 cuts per<br />

year). The succession of annual <strong>crop</strong>s (winter wheat–inter<strong>crop</strong>–spring barley–inter<strong>crop</strong>)<br />

differed by the inter<strong>crop</strong> treatment (<strong>with</strong> or <strong>with</strong>out autumn soil tillage and <strong>with</strong> or <strong>with</strong>out a<br />

mustard cover <strong>crop</strong>).<br />

Total weed plant <strong>de</strong>nsities and aboveground <strong>crop</strong> and weed biomasses were measured every 1-<br />

3 month during the whole vegetation period. Both showed <strong>de</strong>creasing ten<strong>de</strong>ncies in all<br />

treatments of perennial <strong>crop</strong>s but increasing ten<strong>de</strong>ncies in the succession of annual <strong>crop</strong>s.<br />

Species richness showed the same ten<strong>de</strong>ncies but the richness/abundance ratios improved <strong>with</strong><br />

time in perennial <strong>crop</strong>s and <strong>de</strong>teriorated in the annual <strong>crop</strong>s. At the end of the experiment, the<br />

weed community composition differed most strongly between annual and perennial <strong>crop</strong><br />

treatments. This was mainly caused by strong weed population increases of G. aparine, A.<br />

myosuroi<strong>de</strong>s and other annual weed species in all annual <strong>crop</strong> treatments. Among the<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!