Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

D.II.5 Seed predation (D) ...................................................................................... 165 D.II.6 Overview of the underlying mechanisms .................................................... 167 D.III PERSPECTIVES: PREDICTING THE IMPACTS OF PFCS ........................................ 168 D.III.1 Mechanistic models ..................................................................................... 168 D.III.2 Predicting weed regrowth after cutting ....................................................... 170 D.III.3 Factors determining weed seed predation ................................................... 176 D.IV GENERAL CONCLUSION ....................................................................................... 178 E CITED REFERECES .................................................................................................... 183 ANNEXES ............................................................................................................................. 200 ANNEXE 1: KEY WORDS IN ENGLISH, FRENCH & GERMAN ........................................... 200 ANNEXE 2: WHAT IS A WEED? ......................................................................................... 201 ANNEXE 3: WEED SPECIES OF THE LARGE-SCALE SURVEYS .......................................... 204 ERKLÄRUNG (DECLARATION FOR THE GIESSEN UNIVERSITY) ...................................... 210 INDEX OF TABLES Table 1: Contribution of the author to the research articles and manuscripts. ................................................... xxi Table 2: Conceptual overview showing the central role of weeds in three big challenges of modern agriculture and the potential contribution of weed seed predation to solve these three ‘weed problems’. .............................................................................................................................................. 14 Table 3: Four strategies for combining agricultural production and biodiversity conservation. ......................... 18 Table 4: Characteristics of annual crops and PFCs with possible impacts on weeds. ......................................... 28 Table 5: Overview of expected impacts of the proposed modified cropping system. ......................................... 31 Table 6: Characteristics of nine crop treatments (T2-T11). ................................................................................ 74 Table 7: Weed species sown on the experimental plots. ..................................................................................... 75 Table 8: Organic carbon and total nitrogen concentrations in two soil layers 7 weeks after the beginning of the experiment and after two years. ....................................................................................................... 78 Table 9: Pairwise multivariate comparisons of emerged weed communities between 9 crop treatments for all survey dates during 2.5 years using the pairwise Multiple Response Permutation Procedure (MRPP). 83 Table 10: Indicator Species Analysis of emerged weed communities in 9 crop treatments at the end of the experiment in spring 2009. .................................................................................................................... 88 Table 11: Summary of results for five crop treatment comparisons (detailed in previous Figures and Tables). 95 Table 12: Factors differing between five crop treatment comparisons (as in). ................................................... 96 Table 13: Mechanisms causing the impacts of perennial forage crops (PFCs) on weeds. ................................ 100 Table 14: Weed species of the large-scale surveys (Chizé). ............................................................................. 204 viii
INDEX OF FIGURES Fig. 1: Population trends of common bird species in Europe. ............................................................................... 7 Fig. 2: Relation between weed seed density and skylark (Alauda arvensis) density in winter (Norfolk, UK). ..... 8 Fig. 3: Published estimations of superficial weed seed densities in arable soils during the 20th century. ............ 9 Fig. 4: Characterisation of common weed species according to their biodiversity value and potential crop yield loss. ............................................................................................................................................... 13 Fig. 5: Comparison of strategies for combining agricultural production and biodiversity conservation. ............ 17 Fig. 6: Simplified illustration of the trade-off between farming (crop yield), environmental protection and biodiversity conservation. ...................................................................................................................... 20 Fig. 7: Illustration of the modified cropping system (upper part) and hypothetical population dynamics of different weed species (lower part). ....................................................................................................... 32 Fig. 8: Structure of the research project showing 4 empirical approaches. ......................................................... 36 Fig. 9: A) Geographic position of the study region in western France, B) map of crops grown at the study site in 2008, C) the ‘star’ configuration of the 32 vegetation relevés in each field centre, D) temporal development of the principal crops on the study region from 1995 to 2008. ......................................... 40 Fig. 10: A) Spatial set up of the 36 experimental plots (9 crop treatments * 4 repetitions) on an experimental field with 6*9=54 plots. B) Localisation of plant density and biomass measurements on the 6 microplots of each plot. ................................................................................................................................... 77 Fig. 11: Spatial heterogeneities of organic carbon and total nitrogen concentrations in the soil of the experimental field in October 2006 and November 2008. ..................................................................... 78 Fig. 12: Development of emerged weed densities (plants per m 2 ) (A), emerged weed species richnesses (B), and richness/abundance ratios (C) in nine crop treatments. ................................................................... 81 Fig. 13: Temporal development of emerged weed densities (plants per m 2 ) in six perennial crop treatments (T2-T8, upper part) and three successions of annual crops (T9-T11, lower part, plotted with two scales). ................................................................................................................................................... 85 Fig. 14: Temporal development of emerged plant densities of 19 major weed species in nine crop treatments. 86 Fig. 15: Relation between weed sowing density and field emergence densities of 17 weed species. .................. 89 Fig. 16: Effect of weed seed addition on plant density of 16 weed species during the 2-years experiment. ....... 90 Fig. 17: Cumulated crop and weed biomass production in 2007 and 2008 in different crop treatments. ............ 92 Fig. 18: Temporal development of crop and weed biomass in perennial and annual crop treatments. ................ 93 Fig. 19: Relation between crop and weed biomass at five observation dates in 2007 (A) and 2008 (B). ............ 94 Fig. 20: Life cycle of annual and perennial weeds. ............................................................................................. 99 Fig. 21: Comparison of relative weed species frequencies in annual and perennial crops in the large-scale weed surveys (Chizé) and the field experiment (Epoisses). ................................................................. 158 Fig. 22: Comparison of weed seed predation rates of the 2007 and 2008 experiments (cf. Article 6 and 8). .... 166 Fig. 23: Possible relations between the plant age and the plant’s regrowth ability after cutting determined by the ‘quantity of carbohydrate resources that can be remobilized for regrowth’ (B) [g d°day -1 ]. ......... 172 Fig. 24: Daily aboveground biomass increase (ΔBMj) before and after a partial destruction of the photosynthetically active plant organs (cutting). ................................................................................. 174 Fig. 25: Overview of factors determining post-dispersal weed seed predation. ................................................ 177 Fig. 26: Weed species frequency distribution in the large-scale weed surveys (Chizé). ................................... 209 ix
Page 1 and 2: Diversifying crop rotations with te
Page 3 and 4: In Chizé, I am indebted to all the
Page 5 and 6: Talks . ...........................
Page 7: C.II.4.1 Differences between crop t
Page 11 and 12: ABSTRACTS (ENGLISH, FRENCH & GERMAN
Page 13 and 14: Extended summary in English Résum
Page 15 and 16: Extended summary in English Résum
Page 17 and 18: CONTEXT AND FUNDING This thesis is
Page 19 and 20: THESIS ORGANISATION This thesis ent
Page 21 and 22: 8) Meiss, H., Lagadec, L. L., Munie
Page 23 and 24: Posters . 1) Meiss, H., Waldhardt,
Page 25 and 26: 2007). Agriculture is increasingly
Page 27 and 28: term considerations (Munier-Jolain
Page 29 and 30: problematic for the production of d
Page 31 and 32: Newton, 2004). Several bird species
Page 33 and 34: A.III APPROACHES TO ALLEVIATE THE
Page 35 and 36: and higher production costs or even
Page 37 and 38: competitive yield loss (Cousens, 19
Page 39 and 40: 2006; Makowski et al., 2007). Moreo
Page 41 and 42: Table 3: Four strategies for combin
Page 43 and 44: otations is thus an obvious approac
Page 45 and 46: iv) the availability of cheap and e
Page 47 and 48: Clay & Aguilar (1998) compared the
Page 49 and 50: Heggenstaller & Liebman (2006) comp
Page 51 and 52: growth of any (crop or weed) plant
Page 53 and 54: A.V DIVERSIFIED CROPPING SYSTEM CON
Page 55 and 56: crops will thus probably show rathe
Page 57 and 58: annual crops while increasing organ
Page 59 and 60:
• Which species are suppressed, w
Page 61 and 62:
B OVERWIEW OF THE MATERIALS & METHO
Page 63 and 64:
A) France B) Study site ~1000 km Pe
Page 65 and 66:
perennial crops with different mana
Page 67 and 68:
B.III.2.4 Cutting height In 2008, t
Page 69 and 70:
B.IV.3 Design of the seed predation
Page 71 and 72:
Agron. Sustain. Dev. 30 (2010) 657-
Page 73 and 74:
Contrasting weed species compositio
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Mean frequency in perennial lucerne
Page 81 and 82:
C.I.2 Article 2: Meiss, H., Médiè
Page 83 and 84:
332 H Meiss et al. communities (Boo
Page 85 and 86:
334 H Meiss et al. functional group
Page 87 and 88:
336 H Meiss et al. Table 3 Indicato
Page 89 and 90:
338 H Meiss et al. Relative frequen
Page 91 and 92:
340 H Meiss et al. MEISS H, MUNIER-
Page 93 and 94:
perennial crop treatments, differen
Page 95 and 96:
PFCs might inhibit the successful g
Page 97 and 98:
during winter), T10 without soil ti
Page 99 and 100:
The viability and germination abili
Page 101 and 102:
Table 8: Organic carbon and total n
Page 103 and 104:
The development of weed species ric
Page 105 and 106:
C.II.3.1.2 Dynamics of weed communi
Page 107 and 108:
C.II.3.1.3 Dynamics of individual w
Page 109 and 110:
Time Fig. 14: Temporal development
Page 111 and 112:
At the end of the experiment in spr
Page 113 and 114:
Difference sown - unsown (plants m
Page 115 and 116:
Cumulated BM production (g m -2 ) 1
Page 117 and 118:
Weed biomass (g m -2 ) 500 400 300
Page 119 and 120:
Table 12: Factors differing between
Page 121 and 122:
However, some differences in densit
Page 123 and 124:
Table 13: Mechanisms causing the im
Page 125 and 126:
2007 and 2008, while big numbers of
Page 127 and 128:
• Weed biomasses decreased in sum
Page 129 and 130:
Our results show that different mec
Page 131 and 132:
including exotic species (Palmer an
Page 133 and 134:
01234568912661943 ! "#$$%&' ()123)4
Page 135 and 136:
332 3 v77yDDI7FA7D9CyVuB69f7F6BIDI7
Page 137 and 138:
$%%524!'276372224274222489 00123452
Page 139 and 140:
0123156789153263616 52675!6253!1!"5
Page 141 and 142:
XIII ème COLLOQUE INTERNATIONAL SU
Page 143 and 144:
irradiation,…), and (ii) biotic i
Page 145 and 146:
Table I: Species included in the ex
Page 147 and 148:
Fig. 2: Mean biomass (harvestable d
Page 149 and 150:
When both treatments were combined,
Page 151 and 152:
C.IV WEED SEED PREDATION C.IV.1 Art
Page 153 and 154:
99"268)3635683498354836792666676983
Page 155 and 156:
001234564787938494694783 777787946!
Page 157 and 158:
001234564787938494694783 34564789@A
Page 159 and 160:
XIII ème COLLOQUE INTERNATIONAL SU
Page 161 and 162:
produites restent à la surface du
Page 163 and 164:
Tableau 1 : Liste des espèces adve
Page 165 and 166:
Insectes prédateurs Les principaux
Page 167 and 168:
C.IV.3 Article 8: Meiss, H., Lagade
Page 169 and 170:
Table 1 Studies investigating the i
Page 171 and 172:
Table 2 Overview showing (i) mean s
Page 173 and 174:
higher weed seed losses (e.g., Mena
Page 175 and 176:
D GENERAL DISCUSSION Data from weed
Page 177 and 178:
The first two limits could be addre
Page 179 and 180:
composition that may be compared to
Page 181 and 182:
Frequency in field experiment (Epoi
Page 183 and 184:
crops (Clay and Aguilar, 1998; Card
Page 185 and 186:
Such diversified crop rotations cou
Page 187 and 188:
the leaves (needed for photosynthes
Page 189 and 190:
field margin strips (compare Articl
Page 191 and 192:
1) The absence of soil tillage and
Page 193 and 194:
D.III.2 Predicting weed regrowth af
Page 195 and 196:
Future studies must determine the s
Page 197 and 198:
(illustrated in Fig. 24). Later, re
Page 199 and 200:
D.III.3 Factors determining weed se
Page 201 and 202:
governing the presence and abundanc
Page 203 and 204:
natural conditions, weed species po
Page 205 and 206:
This PhD research project documente
Page 207 and 208:
area needed for crop production. Gl
Page 209 and 210:
seed characteristics, tillage and s
Page 211 and 212:
Fried G., S. Petit, F. Dessaint, X.
Page 213 and 214:
at the Eastern base of the Meissner
Page 215 and 216:
Lindegarth M., L. Gamfeldt. (2005)
Page 217 and 218:
Murphy S.D., D.R. Clements, S. Bela
Page 219 and 220:
affected by experimental substrate.
Page 221 and 222:
Vincent G., M. Ahmim. (1985) Note o
Page 223 and 224:
ANNEXES ANNEXE 1: KEY WORDS IN ENGL
Page 225 and 226:
genetically modified crop varieties
Page 227 and 228:
ANNEXE 3: WEED SPECIES OF THE LARGE
Page 229 and 230:
Name of species /genera Code Freq.
Page 231 and 232:
Name of species /genera Code Freq.
Page 233 and 234:
ERKLÄRUNG (DECLARATION FOR THE GIE
show all

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?