14.08.2013 Views

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

iv) the availability of cheap and efficient mineral fertilizers, herbici<strong>de</strong>s and pestici<strong>de</strong>s<br />

that substituted some of the beneficial effects of perennial <strong>crop</strong>s on the following<br />

annual <strong>crop</strong>s (Entz et al., 2002; Katsvairo et al., 2006b).<br />

A.IV EXPECTED IMPACTS OF PERENNIAL CROPS ON WEEDS<br />

A.IV.1 Literature review<br />

Empirical studies investigating the impacts of perennial <strong>crop</strong>s on arable weeds are very<br />

heterogeneous in terms of methodology and not so frequent, probably as the importance of<br />

this <strong>crop</strong> type <strong>de</strong>creased during the 20th century. In this review, studies were found mainly by<br />

using the following key words in popular search engines such as the ‘ISI web of knowledge’<br />

(www.isiknowledge.com) and ‘Google Scholar’ (http://scholar.google.com): “<strong>crop</strong> rotation”,<br />

“<strong>temporary</strong> grassland”, “forage”, “fod<strong>de</strong>r”, “ley”, “mixed farming”, “alfalfa”, “lucerne”,<br />

“clover”, “legume-grass mixture”, “weed management”, “weed community”, “<strong>crop</strong><br />

protection” and by searching both the references cited in these studies and younger articles<br />

citing them. The review was limited to <strong>crop</strong>ping systems in temperate climates and to papers<br />

published after 1992, thus not inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the review of Liebman & Dyck (1993).<br />

There are numerous studies comparing weed infestations in different <strong>crop</strong> <strong>rotations</strong>. However,<br />

most studies inclu<strong>de</strong> only annual <strong>crop</strong>s. This may also be illustrated by the fact that 26 out of<br />

29 comparisons between <strong>rotations</strong> and monocultures reviewed by Liebman & Dyck (1993),<br />

<strong>crop</strong> <strong>rotations</strong> inclu<strong>de</strong>d only annual <strong>crop</strong>s. In the literature search, 15 more recent studies<br />

reporting impacts of PFCs on weeds (sometimes <strong>de</strong>scribed by several successive publications)<br />

were retained. These studies will be shortly reviewed in the following (see also the summary<br />

in Table 1 of Article 1). 13 studies were based on field experiments, only one study on a weed<br />

survey covering a large number of fields of a whole region and one study on interviews of<br />

farmers.<br />

A.IV.1.1 Farmers interview<br />

Entz et al. (1995) interviewed 253 farmers known to inclu<strong>de</strong> forages in their <strong>crop</strong> <strong>rotations</strong> in<br />

two regions of Canada, Manitoba and Saskatchewan in 1992. 67% of them reported yield<br />

benefits and 83 % weed control benefits from including forages in their <strong>rotations</strong>. Weed<br />

control benefits lasted for one (11% of respon<strong>de</strong>nts), two (50% of respon<strong>de</strong>nts), or more (33%<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!