14.08.2013 Views

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

otations is thus an obvious approach to reduce the ‘weeds tra<strong>de</strong>-off’, i.e. to combine high <strong>crop</strong><br />

yields, low reliance on pestici<strong>de</strong> and fertilizer inputs and high biodiversity (see Fig. 6).<br />

Positive influence<br />

Negative influence<br />

C sequestration, Less nitrogen<br />

leaching, soil erosion, energy use<br />

Food<br />

chain<br />

Cropping diversity<br />

rotation complexity,<br />

+ <strong>temporary</strong> <strong>grasslands</strong> ?<br />

Environment Biodiversity direct Crop Yield<br />

Eutrophication, <strong>de</strong>sertification<br />

Pollution<br />

Less predictive<br />

environment<br />

pestici<strong>de</strong>s<br />

20<br />

pest regulation, pollination,…<br />

beneficial<br />

noxious<br />

Competition, pests,…<br />

Different habitats<br />

fertilizer, water<br />

Inputs<br />

indirect<br />

Nitrogen fixation, organic residues<br />

Growth conditions + resources<br />

Fig. 6: Simplified illustration of the tra<strong>de</strong>-off between farming (<strong>crop</strong> yield), environmental protection and<br />

biodiversity conservation.<br />

The tra<strong>de</strong>-off is mediated by influences of the farming inputs (pestici<strong>de</strong>s, fertilizers and irrigation water) (positive<br />

for <strong>crop</strong>s, negative for environment and biodiversity). By increasing the <strong>crop</strong> diversity (using complex <strong>crop</strong><br />

<strong>rotations</strong>), some of the functions of the farming inputs (<strong>crop</strong> fertilisation, pest regulation) may be substituted,<br />

which would have different beneficial effects on the environment and biodiversity.<br />

The present work focalizes on the temporal diversity of <strong>crop</strong>s in the framework of <strong>crop</strong><br />

<strong>rotations</strong>. Growing several <strong>crop</strong> species together at the same time (‘inter<strong>crop</strong>s’, ‘companion<br />

<strong>crop</strong>s’ and ‘un<strong>de</strong>rsowing’ techniques) is another possibility to increase the <strong>crop</strong> diversity. It<br />

may also be used for Integrated Weed Management and for increasing biodiversity in the<br />

farmland (Liebman and Dyck, 1993; Palmer and Maurer, 1997) but will not be addressed in<br />

this work.<br />

Crop <strong>rotations</strong> may be diversified by introducing either (a) other annual ‘cash’ <strong>crop</strong>s,<br />

preferably <strong>with</strong> dissimilar characteristics, (b) ‘cover’ or ‘catch’ <strong>crop</strong>s grown between<br />

successive annual <strong>crop</strong>s (replacing periods of bare soil) (Barberi, 2002; Smith and Gross,<br />

2007), but also (c) perennial <strong>crop</strong>s that last for several years on the field (Sebillotte, 1980;<br />

Freyer, 2003) (see section A.III.9). Perennial <strong>crop</strong>s may be of special interest for weed<br />

management and biodiversity, as it may provi<strong>de</strong> conditions for weeds (and animals) that are

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!