14.08.2013 Views

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

term consi<strong>de</strong>rations (Munier-Jolain et al., 2002). In reality, farmers have to control weeds not<br />

only to avoid yield losses in the current <strong>crop</strong>, but also to limit weed seed production for<br />

reducing weed infestations in future <strong>crop</strong>s.<br />

A.II.2 Weed control & environment<br />

Since about 1950, herbici<strong>de</strong>s have become the main technique of weed control in arable field<br />

<strong>crop</strong>s (cereals, rape, beets, maize…) of industrialized <strong>crop</strong>ping systems largely replacing other<br />

techniques and principles such as cultural and mechanical control (see Ch. A.III.2 below).<br />

Herbici<strong>de</strong>s may be applied rather easily on large surfaces and are generally very efficient in<br />

killing the plants of most species. Therefore, herbici<strong>de</strong>s may contribute to the maintenance of<br />

<strong>crop</strong> yields and to the economic profitability of the farms. The <strong>de</strong>velopment of different<br />

herbici<strong>de</strong>s was one important factor that enabled the simplification of <strong>crop</strong>ping systems<br />

including shorter <strong>crop</strong> <strong>rotations</strong> and monocultures (and, more recently, no-till practices).<br />

However, the reliance on herbici<strong>de</strong>s may have several agronomic, economic and<br />

environmental drawbacks that will be summarized in the following.<br />

Efficiency and selectivity<br />

Despite the intensive use of herbici<strong>de</strong>s and other curative weed control techniques for many<br />

<strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s, the ‘weed problem’ could not be solved. Weeds did not disappear from arable fields,<br />

which was a wi<strong>de</strong>spread hope when herbici<strong>de</strong>s became available. Intensified curative weed<br />

control as well as changed agronomic practices (including simplified <strong>crop</strong> <strong>rotations</strong> dominated<br />

by annual winter-sown <strong>crop</strong>s) rather lead to reduced weed species numbers and community<br />

shifts. While many species showed strong population <strong>de</strong>clines or even got extinct from entire<br />

regions (see Ch. A.II.3), some other less sensitive species showed increasing abundances and<br />

distributions. In some cases, the repeated use of herbici<strong>de</strong>s <strong>with</strong> the same mo<strong>de</strong> of action<br />

during many consecutive years selected herbici<strong>de</strong> resistant biotypes of weed species that are<br />

normally killed. Resistances are observed for an increasing number of herbici<strong>de</strong> molecules<br />

and weed species worldwi<strong>de</strong>, but particularly in industrialized countries (as documented by<br />

Heap, 2009). In some situations, herbici<strong>de</strong>s may also damage the <strong>crop</strong>s and reduce <strong>crop</strong> yields<br />

which may lower the economic profitability. These problems of herbici<strong>de</strong> efficiency and<br />

selectivity show that weed management should not be based on one single principle.<br />

Economic costs<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!