Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...
Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...
Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2007). Agriculture is increasingly <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt on limited fossil resources to produce the<br />
fertilizer, pestici<strong>de</strong> and water inputs and to run the farming machinery. Pollution by pestici<strong>de</strong>s<br />
and fertilizers may have negative effects on ecosystems and humans (Huber et al., 2000).<br />
Agriculture is also an important driver of climate change. In 2004, it caused about 14% of the<br />
worldwi<strong>de</strong> human greenhouse gas emissions (mainly CH4 and N2O), the 14% do not inclu<strong>de</strong><br />
the CO2 emitted due to the use of fossil fuels (IPCC, 2007, Figure TS.2b). Land use change<br />
including the <strong>de</strong>forestation for agriculture accounted for an additional 17% of anthropogenic<br />
greenhouse gas emissions (mainly CO2) in 2004 (IPCC, 2007, Figure TS.2b). It is estimated<br />
that soils of agricultural ecosystems have lost between 50% and 75% of their antece<strong>de</strong>nt<br />
carbon content (Lal, 2007). Since 1850, about 35% of the anthropogenic CO2 emissions<br />
resulted directly from land use (Foley et al., 2005). Finally, land use change (including the<br />
conversion of natural areas and agricultural intensification) is thought to be the most important<br />
driver of the observed global biodiversity loss, even before climate change, nitrogen<br />
<strong>de</strong>position and biotic exchange (invasions of exotic species) (Sala et al., 2000). In Europe,<br />
both the intensification of farming practices as well as the abandonment of agriculture in other<br />
regions are both big threats to biodiversity at different levels (genes, species, ecosystems),<br />
including the ‘wild’ species typical for farmed landscapes (van Elsen and Günther, 1992;<br />
Matson et al., 1997; Krebs et al., 1999; MacDonald et al., 2000a; Stoate et al., 2001;<br />
Bretagnolle, 2004) and the domesticated species, varieties or races of <strong>crop</strong>s and livestock. The<br />
loss of both ‘wild’ and ‘domesticated’ biodiversity (often also called ‘associated biodiversity’<br />
and ‘agrobiodiversity’, respectively) may have various negative consequences. Besi<strong>de</strong>s<br />
aesthetic, moral and ethical/religious reasons, biodiversity is nee<strong>de</strong>d to maintain important<br />
ecosystem functions and services (reviewed in Chapin et al., 2000; Hooper et al., 2005; Diaz<br />
et al., 2006). This inclu<strong>de</strong>s nutriment cycling, pollination and pest control, thus also direct<br />
benefits for <strong>crop</strong> production (Altieri, 1999; Swift et al., 2004; Clergue et al., 2005; Berger et<br />
al., 2006; Albrecht et al., 2007; Moonen and Bàrberi, 2008). The chemical and genetic<br />
resources of many ‘wild’ organisms may also be used for the production of food or<br />
pharmaceutics and for <strong>crop</strong> and livestock breeding. Finally, there are more general benefits of<br />
biodiversity to human well-being, which are increasingly recognized (MEA, 2005; Diaz et al.,<br />
2006).<br />
The challenge of mo<strong>de</strong>rn agriculture is thus to reduce its negative impacts on the environment<br />
and on biodiversity as well as the reliance on external inputs while maintaining or further<br />
increasing its productivity on the short and long term (Tilman et al., 2002; Tybirk et al.,<br />
2