14.08.2013 Views

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1) The absence of soil tillage and the high quantity of biomass in PFCs may also favour the<br />

establishment of a weed-suppressive mulch (Wiens et al., 2006).<br />

2) High vegetation cover (and mulch) also changes the light quality, temperature and<br />

humidity on the soil surface, which impacts weed germination (Huarte and Arnold, 2003).<br />

3) Weed seed survival on the soil surface might not only be reduced due to seed predation,<br />

but also to seed <strong>de</strong>cay.<br />

4) Some perennial <strong>crop</strong>s such as alfalfa (but also several annual <strong>crop</strong> species) might liberate<br />

allelopathic compounds inhibiting weed growth (Xuan and Tsuzuki, 2002).<br />

5) Finally, improvements in soil structure and fertility, reductions in parasites or diseases of<br />

cash <strong>crop</strong>s caused by PFCs might also ameliorate the growth and competitive ability<br />

against weeds of <strong>crop</strong>s following PFCs.<br />

D.III PERSPECTIVES: PREDICTING THE IMPACTS OF PFCS<br />

D.III.1 Mechanistic mo<strong>de</strong>ls<br />

Predicting weed population and community dynamics as a function of <strong>crop</strong>ping system is a<br />

challenging issue due to the complexity of the system and the high number of interacting<br />

factors linked to <strong>crop</strong>s, <strong>crop</strong> management practices, soil and climatic parameters and the<br />

diversity of weed species traits (Colbach and Debaeke, 1998). Mechanistic mo<strong>de</strong>ls simulating<br />

the various processes and cumulative effects involved in weed population dynamics are<br />

valuable tools for two main reasons. First, they have a heuristic value helping to better<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rstand the complexity of the system, to i<strong>de</strong>ntify possible interactions between processes<br />

and factors, and to rank the significance of the factors affecting the fate of the field/weed<br />

system. Second, they might be used for simulating a variety of <strong>crop</strong>ping systems (‘in silico<br />

experiments’), helping to i<strong>de</strong>ntify solutions for weed management problems, and to perform<br />

ex ante evaluations of alternative <strong>crop</strong>ping systems. In silico experiments might partly replace<br />

<strong>crop</strong>ping system field experiments that are difficult to perform because of the long duration<br />

required for accounting for cumulative effects (Colbach and Debaeke, 1998). The mechanistic<br />

representation of involved processes is also a means to provi<strong>de</strong> a large domain of validity for<br />

168

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!