Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...
Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...
Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Although the reason for differences in predation rates among species is still unknown, such a<br />
preference or<strong>de</strong>r indicates that weed seed predation may contribute to changes in the weed<br />
community composition (White et al., 2007). Moreover, weed seed predation would have<br />
lower impacts on perennial species and species that may reproduce vegetatively. Even if direct<br />
evi<strong>de</strong>nce is difficult to obtain, seed predation is probably an important factor un<strong>de</strong>rlying the<br />
impacts on weed population dynamics and weed community changes in and after PFCs.<br />
However, it is not yet clear which proportion of seeds is directly eaten by the predators and<br />
how many seeds are only removed and dispersed.<br />
D.II.6 Overview of the un<strong>de</strong>rlying mechanisms<br />
The results suggest that the impacts of PFCs on weeds are probably produced by several<br />
factors affecting different phases of the weed life cycle including seed germination and<br />
emergence, plant survival and vegetative growth, seed production and seed survival. The<br />
absence of soil tillage probably favoured perennial over annual weeds (at least for the<br />
broadleaved species), the temporarily exten<strong>de</strong>d competition probably reduced vegetative weed<br />
growth and seed production, mowings suppressed in particular the upright weeds while<br />
favouring several grasses and broadleaved species <strong>with</strong> rosettes and seed predation probably<br />
affected annuals more than perennial species. The importance of the different mechanisms<br />
probably varies <strong>with</strong> weed life stage: The impacts of cuttings increases <strong>with</strong> plant age (Article<br />
4), the impact of competition is probably highest for young weed plants (Magda et al., 2006),<br />
and soil tillage has both high impacts on seed germination but also on all other plant stages.<br />
PFCs thus impose diverse selection pressures to wild plants. As the concept of IWM itself, the<br />
weed regulating function of PFCs is probably based on several mechanisms. Therefore, the<br />
risk of selecting ‘resistant’ weed biotypes among the suppressed arable weed species would be<br />
lower than for ‘single-mechanism’ weed control techniques. It is more likely that the imposed<br />
selection pressures modify the weed community assembly as observed in Articles 1-3 on the<br />
general impacts and Articles 4-8 on specific mechanisms.<br />
Some of the mechanisms causing the impacts of PFCs on weeds could be clearly <strong>de</strong>monstrated<br />
in this project. However, the relative importance of them is difficult to <strong>de</strong>termine and may<br />
strongly vary between local situations. Moreover, there may be other mechanisms and<br />
interactions that could not be investigated:<br />
167