Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...
Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...
Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
D.I EVIDENCE OF THE IMPACTS OF PFCS ON WEEDS<br />
D.I.1 Differences in species composition between current <strong>crop</strong>s<br />
Comparisons of the weed community composition found in various <strong>crop</strong>s showed that<br />
differences between annual and perennial <strong>crop</strong>s were even higher than the well-known<br />
differences between autumn and spring-sown annual <strong>crop</strong>s (Fig. 1 and Table 3 of Article 1).<br />
Indicator Species Analysis showed that most of the frequent weed species either preferred<br />
perennial lucernes (including Taraxacum officinale, Veronica persica, Crepis sp., Poa<br />
trivialis, Silene latifolia, Capsella bursa-pastoris, Picris sp.) or annual <strong>crop</strong>s (including<br />
Mercurialis annua, Galium aparine, Fallopia convolvulus, Chenopodium album, and Cirsium<br />
arvense) (Table 4 of Article 1). The results thus indicate that perennial lucernes suppressed<br />
many weeds that are wi<strong>de</strong>spread (and sometimes problematic) in annual <strong>crop</strong>s while favouring<br />
other species. Stellaria media and Alopecurus myosuroi<strong>de</strong>s were the only frequent weed<br />
species (present in more than 5% of the fields) that showed about equal frequencies in annual<br />
and perennial <strong>crop</strong>s (Fig. 2 of Article 1). Such large-scale comparisons of weed communities<br />
between annual and perennial <strong>crop</strong>s have probably not been published previously, in contrast<br />
to the comparisons between different annual <strong>crop</strong>s (e.g., Andreasen et al., 1996; Murphy et<br />
al., 2006; Fried et al., 2008).<br />
The main advantages of this large-scale study are linked to the random distribution of the<br />
fields and the use of data covering three years, which increased the spatial and temporal<br />
generality compared to the previously published studies, mainly based on small-scale field<br />
experiments (cf. literature review A.IV.1). However, this first approach has also three limits:<br />
1) The large-scale weed surveys are only based on one survey per year and may thus miss<br />
weed species growing during other seasons.<br />
2) As in other previous studies, weed communities in spring- and autumn-sown annual <strong>crop</strong>s<br />
were not evaluated at the same dates, which might increase the differences in species<br />
composition. In contrast, the differences between perennial <strong>crop</strong>s and autumn-sown annual<br />
<strong>crop</strong>s are not concerned by this limit, as they were surveyed at the same period.<br />
3) Finally, this approach does not say anything about the reproductive success of the recor<strong>de</strong>d<br />
species, which will be important for long-term effects.<br />
153