14.08.2013 Views

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

height (Bell and Ritchie, 1989), cutting dates (adapted to <strong>crop</strong> or weed growth dynamics) and<br />

<strong>crop</strong> species mixtures (see below).<br />

The high temporal resolution of the measurements permitted to follow the weed population<br />

dynamics on a much finer scale compared to the Chizé surveys and other previous studies,<br />

which often conduct only one or two evaluations of the weed <strong>de</strong>nsity per year. Comparisons of<br />

this experimental study to the large-scale weed surveys on commercial fields showed that the<br />

weed community composition reacted in similar ways (see chapter D.I.1 of the general<br />

discussion for <strong>de</strong>tails). This increased the general value of this experimental study.<br />

Four repetitions of each <strong>crop</strong> treatment on a rather small experimental site <strong>with</strong> rather<br />

homogeneous chemical soil conditions (except a gradients in the organic carbon and total<br />

nitrogen contents, Fig. 11) gave a sound basis for the comparisons. The enrichment of each<br />

plot <strong>with</strong> a <strong>de</strong>fined quantity of weed seeds belonging to 17 annual weed species increased the<br />

homogeneity of the repetitions and reduced the number of quadrats where no weeds could be<br />

observed, increasing the statistical power. In future studies, it would be interesting to add also<br />

propagules of perennial weed species to the soil, species that had rather low natural <strong>de</strong>nsities<br />

in this experimental site. The plot size was rather small compared to some other studies, thus<br />

requiring specific soil tillage and forage cutting equipment adapted to the experimental plots,<br />

and the restriction to weed species that are not wind-dispersed. Two other facts moved this<br />

experiment away from the current agronomic reality:<br />

• Only monospecific Medicago- or Dactylis- PFCs were inclu<strong>de</strong>d in this study, while both<br />

organic and conventional farmers often use mixtures of two or more grass and legume<br />

species. In our experiment Medicago and Dactylis <strong>crop</strong>s had different temporal growth<br />

dynamics (including the speed of <strong>crop</strong> establishment, seasons of highest biomass<br />

production, regrowth speed after cuttings and plant longevity). The Dactylis stands showed<br />

a rather slow establishment, were very competitive in the middle of the experiment,<br />

presented very quick regrowth after the cuttings, but also first signs of senescence at the<br />

end. In contrast, Medicago stands were strong during the whole 2.5-years period, but had a<br />

slower post-cutting regrowth (compared to the Dactylis grasses). Other experiments<br />

indicated that resource use efficiencies and competitive abilities of <strong>crop</strong> species mixtures<br />

may be higher compared to monospecific <strong>crop</strong> stands due to ‘sampling effects’,<br />

‘complementarity effects’ and ‘facilitation’, which may <strong>de</strong>crease the invasibility for weeds<br />

107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!