Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...
Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...
Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>grasslands</strong> (Magda et al., 2004; Hald, 2007), sometimes for set-asi<strong>de</strong> fields (Dalbies-Dulout<br />
and Dore, 2001), but only rarely for <strong>temporary</strong> <strong>grasslands</strong> (Norris and Ayres, 1991; Hoveland<br />
et al., 1996; Graglia et al., 2006) or as (in-row) mowing treatments in annual <strong>crop</strong>s used for<br />
weed control (Donald, 2007).<br />
In our experiment, several indications show that hay cutting had strong impacts on weed<br />
population dynamics:<br />
• The first 1-2 cutting operations in perennial <strong>crop</strong>s after <strong>crop</strong> (and weed) sowing had strong<br />
negative effects on weed biomass (Fig. 18) suggesting that cutting enhanced the<br />
competitive advantage of perennial <strong>crop</strong>s, who showed a quicker regrowth than most<br />
weeds.<br />
• In reducing weed biomass and seed production, the cutting operations were probably an<br />
important factor causing the low weed plant <strong>de</strong>nsities in perennial <strong>crop</strong>s compared to<br />
annual <strong>crop</strong>s, who were cut only once per year (Fig. 12, Fig. 13).<br />
• In contrast, modifying the cutting frequency in the perennial <strong>crop</strong>s (3 vs. 5 cuts per year)<br />
caused relatively small effects (see above). When pooling all weed species, differences<br />
between the high and the low cutting frequency had no effects on the final weed <strong>de</strong>nsities.<br />
When looking at all measurement dates during the 2.5-years experiment, differences<br />
between the low and the high cutting frequency were only visible in alfalfa, where the<br />
lower frequency led to lower weed plant mortality rates and thus higher weed plant<br />
<strong>de</strong>nsities at the end of 2007 and increased weed biomass at the beginning of 2008.<br />
However, these weeds disappeared at the first hay cutting in May (Fig. 18). In cocksfoot,<br />
variations of the cutting frequency had no impacts, as weed <strong>de</strong>nsities were always very low<br />
(probably due to the <strong>de</strong>nse superficial roots or other mechanisms suppressing weed<br />
emergence).<br />
• Besi<strong>de</strong>s the differences between annual and perennial <strong>crop</strong>s, cutting might have also<br />
caused some of the differences in weed plant and seed bank composition between spring<br />
and autumn sown <strong>crop</strong>s. While autumn-sown <strong>crop</strong>s were cut already twice in spring 2007<br />
(27/4 and 7/6), the spring-sown <strong>crop</strong>s were cut for the first time in summer (13/7) and<br />
some spring emerging species might have successfully produced seeds before.<br />
C.II.4.3.4 Interactions between the three factors<br />
105