14.08.2013 Views

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• Weed biomasses <strong>de</strong>creased in summer (June-July 2007) both in the cut and the uncut<br />

treatments (Fig. 18), which was probably due to the high Dactylis and Medicago <strong>crop</strong><br />

biomass.<br />

• The reappearance of some weeds in Medicago <strong>crop</strong>s in 2008 might be due to the reduced<br />

competition of this <strong>crop</strong> immediately after the cutting operations in contrast to Dactylis,<br />

where regrowth started immediately after cutting.<br />

• The high impact of competition was also visible through the fact that big weed plants<br />

<strong>de</strong>veloped mainly in gaps of the <strong>crop</strong> canopy or when the perennial <strong>crop</strong> was<br />

experimentally removed on small sub-plots (data not shown).<br />

• While the <strong>crop</strong> growth dynamics were similar for winter wheat and the autumn sown<br />

alfalfa in 2006/2007, all perennial <strong>crop</strong>s had strong competitive advantages since<br />

2007/2008 compared to the annual spring barley. Although spring barley was sown quite<br />

early in the year (February 2008), the <strong>de</strong>velopment of a competitive vegetation cover was<br />

much quicker in the established perennial <strong>crop</strong>s (Fig. 18). This was probably an important<br />

factor leading to very low absolute and relative weed biomasses in the perennial <strong>crop</strong>s<br />

since the second year. In contrast, some weed species including G. aparine, A.<br />

myosuroi<strong>de</strong>s, Polygonum spp, C. album and Sinapis arvensis <strong>de</strong>veloped very high<br />

biomasses (per plant and per m 2<br />

) in the annual <strong>crop</strong> ( Fig. 18),<br />

even causing <strong>crop</strong> yield<br />

reductions (data not shown).<br />

Competition was thus probably an important factor for the <strong>de</strong>creasing weed biomasses in the<br />

perennial <strong>crop</strong>s. This ‘success’ was the reason for the initial negative relation between <strong>crop</strong><br />

and weed biomasses became weaker <strong>with</strong> time and disappeared in 2008 (Fig. 19).<br />

C.II.4.3.3 Hay cuttings (C)<br />

Hay cuttings present generally the only mechanical disturbances in PFCs. It <strong>de</strong>stroys all plant<br />

organs above about 5 cm from the soil surface and may therefore consi<strong>de</strong>rably reduce biomass<br />

and seed production of tall weeds (Table 13). The impacts of cuttings on arable weeds are not<br />

frequently studied, probably as this kind of <strong>crop</strong> management is not very important in annual<br />

<strong>crop</strong>s, which are mostly harvested only once per year <strong>with</strong> cutting heights that are often much<br />

higher than mowing of PFCs. In annual <strong>crop</strong>s, cutting for <strong>crop</strong> harvest has thus probably<br />

limited impacts on weeds in contrast to the soil tillage operations applied after harvest.<br />

Therefore, the impacts of cuttings on weeds are mostly studied in the context of permanent<br />

104

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!