Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...
Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...
Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 13: Mechanisms causing the impacts of perennial forage <strong>crop</strong>s (PFCs) on weeds.<br />
Hypothetic impacts of three characteristics of PFCs (A, B, C) on seven stages of the weed life cycle (1-7,<br />
corresponding to Fig. 20).<br />
Weed life cycle<br />
stage<br />
(1) Germination<br />
(2) Emergence<br />
(3) Vegetative<br />
growth<br />
(4) Plant survival<br />
A) Absence of soil tillage<br />
Reduce*** (M3)<br />
(lack of stimulation<br />
by light or oxygen,<br />
lack of soil contact,<br />
no seeds digged up?)<br />
or increase 0<br />
(M3) (seeds<br />
not <strong>de</strong>eply<br />
buried?)<br />
Increase*** (M3)<br />
(reduced plant <strong>de</strong>struction)<br />
Characteristics of PFCs<br />
100<br />
B) Temporally exten<strong>de</strong>d<br />
vegetation cover<br />
Reduce* (M3)<br />
(less light quantity and<br />
modified light quality<br />
un<strong>de</strong>r plant canopy?)<br />
Reduce*** (M3, M5)<br />
(competition for light,<br />
water and nutrients)<br />
C) Frequent hay cuttings<br />
Increase 0<br />
(M3)<br />
(temporarily reduced<br />
vegetation cover<br />
-> more light on soil<br />
surface?)<br />
/ or increase 0<br />
Reduce***<br />
(increased<br />
shoot<br />
<strong>de</strong>struction,<br />
M3, A4, A5)<br />
(temporarily<br />
reduced<br />
competition<br />
for light?,<br />
M3, A5)<br />
(5) Flowering /<br />
(6) Seed production /<br />
(7) Seed survival<br />
Reduce*<br />
(seeds stay on surface: more seed<br />
predation A6-8, higher mortality,<br />
more fatal germinations?)<br />
Reduce**<br />
(better habitat for seed<br />
predators, A8)<br />
Increase*<br />
(reduced seed predation due<br />
to habitat modification or<br />
predator <strong>de</strong>struction,<br />
A8)<br />
*** high evi<strong>de</strong>nce; ** medium evi<strong>de</strong>nce; * low evi<strong>de</strong>nce; 0<br />
no evi<strong>de</strong>nce; / probably no strong impacts; M3<br />
Manuscript 3, A8 Article 8, etc.<br />
C.II.4.3.1 Soil tillage (A)<br />
Soil tillage is known to be one of the most important <strong>crop</strong> management techniques<br />
<strong>de</strong>termining weed population dynamics and community composition in arable fields (Kego<strong>de</strong><br />
et al., 1999; Barberi and Lo Cascio, 2001; Menalled et al., 2001; Davis et al., 2005; Murphy et<br />
al., 2006). In our experiment, the observed differences in weed population dynamics between<br />
(i) annual and perennial <strong>crop</strong>s, (ii) spring and autumn sown perennial <strong>crop</strong>s and (iii) the<br />
different inter<strong>crop</strong> treatments of the annual <strong>crop</strong>s were probably caused in large parts by<br />
differences in soil tillage (see Table 12 for an overview).<br />
The experimental results give evi<strong>de</strong>nce for two major and well-known impacts of soil tillage<br />
on weeds: (1) the mechanical <strong>de</strong>struction of established weed plants and (2) the stimulation of<br />
new weed emergence. The first mechanism has mainly negative effects on weed population<br />
dynamics (and is therefore wi<strong>de</strong>ly used in various forms of mechanical weed control).<br />
However, in <strong>de</strong>stroying weed (and <strong>crop</strong>) plants, soil tillage and other mechanical disturbances<br />
may also create a less competitive environment that may be beneficial for other weeds (see