14.08.2013 Views

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

However, some differences in <strong>de</strong>nsity and diversity of the emerged weed vegetation were<br />

<strong>de</strong>tected. During the establishment phase, cocksfoot <strong>crop</strong>s showed higher weed <strong>de</strong>nsities and<br />

biomasses than alfalfa, which might be due to reduced competition. In contrast, cocksfoot<br />

<strong>crop</strong>s had even lower weed <strong>de</strong>nsities and diversities than alfalfa during the second half of the<br />

experiment, which might be due to reduced weed emergence (see chapter D.II ‘Un<strong>de</strong>rlying<br />

mechanisms’ below).<br />

C.II.4.2.3 Cutting frequency<br />

Hay cuttings are often the only mechanical disturbances in PFCs and might have strong direct<br />

and indirect impacts on weeds (<strong>de</strong>stroying weed shoots and modifying the competitive<br />

environment). It might thus be surprising that the difference between the high and the low<br />

cutting frequency (5 vs. 3 cuts per year) had only rather low impacts in the field experiment.<br />

These low differences are in contrast to the high differences between annual and perennial<br />

<strong>crop</strong>s that also differed by the cutting frequency (annual cereal <strong>crop</strong>s were harvested only once<br />

per year).<br />

The lower cutting frequency led to slightly increased final weed species diversities. This may<br />

indicate that the lower cutting frequency allowed a higher number of different species to<br />

successfully terminate their life cycles. In contrast, no significant effects could be <strong>de</strong>tected on<br />

final plant <strong>de</strong>nsities, although plots <strong>with</strong> the lower cutting frequency showed higher weed<br />

biomass at some measurement dates. Two antagonistic processes might have caused this<br />

balanced result: the lower cutting frequency might have reduced the direct <strong>de</strong>struction of weed<br />

shoots but also lead to longer periods where the soil is covered by the <strong>crop</strong> canopy increasing<br />

competition for light. The latter mechanism was visible in cocksfoot, where the lower cutting<br />

frequency led even to higher cumulated <strong>crop</strong> biomass production (Fig. 17). This was also<br />

observed in other studies. Bell et al. (1989) showed that yield and competitive ability of<br />

Bromus will<strong>de</strong>nowii-<strong>grasslands</strong> in New Zealand increased when cutting frequency was<br />

reduced (40-50 days instead of 10, 20, or 30 days). In a similar way, Hoveland et al. (1996)<br />

reported that Medicago sativa <strong>grasslands</strong> in Georgia, USA, showed better regrowth <strong>with</strong> a 4 or<br />

6 weeks interval compared to 2 weeks, where yields were reduced by 50% and weed invasion<br />

favoured.<br />

98

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!