Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...
Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...
Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
succession of annual <strong>crop</strong>s, plant communities were characterized by several common annual<br />
weed species including those often reported as problematic in annual cereal <strong>crop</strong>s such as G.<br />
aparine, A. myosuroi<strong>de</strong>s, F. convolvulus, P. aviculare, P. rhoeas, and Sinapis arvensis.<br />
C.II.4.2 Grassland management practices<br />
While <strong>crop</strong> management options could not be distinguished in the large-scale weed surveys,<br />
the field experiment permitted to compare tree treatment factors that were partially crossed:<br />
two different perennial <strong>crop</strong> species, two sowing seasons and two cutting frequencies. Such<br />
comparisons were rarely done in the previously published studies (reviewed in Article 1,<br />
Meiss et al., 2010a). Weeds reacted differently to these treatments, which will be discussed in<br />
the following. These differences may give first indications on the optimal perennial <strong>crop</strong><br />
management and may inform about the mechanisms potentially un<strong>de</strong>rlying the impacts.<br />
However, one should keep in mind that the differences between these treatments were mostly<br />
much less strong than between annual and perennial <strong>crop</strong>s (see overview in Table 11).<br />
C.II.4.2.1 Sowing date<br />
Among the three treatment factors, <strong>crop</strong> sowing date (autumn vs. spring) had strongest<br />
impacts on weed species composition, while the total weed <strong>de</strong>nsities were rather similar. In<br />
the emerged weed vegetation, the differences in species composition <strong>de</strong>creased <strong>with</strong> time<br />
(Table 9). These results highlight the importance of the establishment phase of the perennial<br />
<strong>crop</strong>. Sowing date is known to have strong impacts on weed species composition in annual<br />
<strong>crop</strong>s (Hald, 1999), but such impacts have never been <strong>de</strong>monstrated for perennial <strong>crop</strong>s.<br />
C.II.4.2.2 Crop species<br />
Although legume (Medicago sativa) and grass (Dactylis glomerata) <strong>crop</strong>s may differ in<br />
various aspects including temporal growth dynamics, nitrogen fixation and fertilisation<br />
regimes, competitive ability and allelopathy (Table 12), <strong>crop</strong> species was not the most<br />
important treatment factor in the field experiment (see overview in Table 11). This is in line<br />
<strong>with</strong> previous studies by An<strong>de</strong>rsson and Milberg (1996; , 1998), who <strong>de</strong>tected strong<br />
differences in weed <strong>de</strong>nsity and species composition between annual and perennial ley <strong>crop</strong>s<br />
during 6-year <strong>crop</strong> <strong>rotations</strong>, but not between grass and grass-legume leys. Similarly,<br />
Bellin<strong>de</strong>r et al. (2004), did not find differences in weed seed banks after alfalfa and clover<br />
forage <strong>crop</strong>s.<br />
97