14.08.2013 Views

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

C.II.4 Discussion<br />

C.II.4.1 Differences between <strong>crop</strong> treatments<br />

Results of this 2.5-year field experiment show that weed populations reacted in contrasted<br />

ways<br />

to the compared <strong>crop</strong> treatments. At the end, differences in weed plant <strong>de</strong>nsities,<br />

diversities, biomasses and species composition were strongest between the annual and<br />

perennial <strong>crop</strong>s (cf. summary in Table 11).<br />

Differences between autumn and spring-sown<br />

perennial <strong>crop</strong>s and between annual <strong>crop</strong>s <strong>with</strong> or <strong>with</strong>out soil tillage after harvest came at the<br />

second and third places, while the other factors (forage <strong>crop</strong> species, cutting frequency and the<br />

mustard inter<strong>crop</strong>) resulted in lower differences (Table 11).<br />

Table 11: Summary of results for five <strong>crop</strong> treatment comparisons (<strong>de</strong>tailed in previous Figures and Tables).<br />

Treatment comparison<br />

Criteria Time<br />

Crop type Species<br />

Sowing<br />

season<br />

Cutting Tillage in<br />

frequency inter<strong>crop</strong><br />

Annual vs. Dactylis vs.<br />

Perennial Medicago<br />

Spring vs.<br />

3 vs. 5/year<br />

Autumn<br />

With vs.<br />

<strong>with</strong>out<br />

Emerged weed plants<br />

Density (Fig. 12A, Fig. 13)<br />

Beginning P >> An<br />

End An >> P<br />

=<br />

M > D<br />

=<br />

D: A > S<br />

=<br />

=<br />

=<br />

T+ >~ T-<br />

Diversity (Fig. 12B)<br />

Beginning P >> An<br />

End An >> P<br />

=<br />

M >> D<br />

S > A<br />

S > A<br />

=<br />

C- >~ C+<br />

=<br />

=<br />

Ratio richness/abundance (Fig. 12C)<br />

Beginning An >> P<br />

End P >> An<br />

=<br />

D > M<br />

A >~ S<br />

=<br />

=<br />

=<br />

=<br />

=<br />

Biomass (Fig. 17)<br />

Beginning<br />

End<br />

P > An<br />

An >> P<br />

D > M<br />

=<br />

S >> A<br />

=<br />

=<br />

=<br />

=<br />

=<br />

Species composition (Table 9)<br />

Beginning<br />

End<br />

≠ ≠<br />

≠ ≠ ≠<br />

=<br />

≠ ≠<br />

≠ ≠<br />

≠<br />

=<br />

M: ≠<br />

=<br />

≠<br />

End; last months of the experiment; Beginning; first months of the experiment; An, Succession of annual <strong>crop</strong>s;<br />

P, Perennial <strong>crop</strong>s; D, Dactylis glomerata; M, Medicago sativa;<br />

S, Spring-sown; A, Autumn sown perennial<br />

<strong>crop</strong>s; C-, cut 3 times per year; C+, 5 cuts/year; T-, <strong>with</strong>out soil tillage during inter<strong>crop</strong>s; T+, <strong>with</strong> soil tillage;<br />

>>, much higher than (white cells); >, higher than (light grey cells); >~, tends to be higher than (grey cells); S: /<br />

D:, differences exist only for Spring-sown / Dactylis <strong>crop</strong>s; ≠ ≠ ≠, very strong differences (white); ≠ ≠, strong<br />

differences (light grey); ≠, medium differences (grey); =, no differences (black).<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!