Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...
Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...
Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
C.II.4 Discussion<br />
C.II.4.1 Differences between <strong>crop</strong> treatments<br />
Results of this 2.5-year field experiment show that weed populations reacted in contrasted<br />
ways<br />
to the compared <strong>crop</strong> treatments. At the end, differences in weed plant <strong>de</strong>nsities,<br />
diversities, biomasses and species composition were strongest between the annual and<br />
perennial <strong>crop</strong>s (cf. summary in Table 11).<br />
Differences between autumn and spring-sown<br />
perennial <strong>crop</strong>s and between annual <strong>crop</strong>s <strong>with</strong> or <strong>with</strong>out soil tillage after harvest came at the<br />
second and third places, while the other factors (forage <strong>crop</strong> species, cutting frequency and the<br />
mustard inter<strong>crop</strong>) resulted in lower differences (Table 11).<br />
Table 11: Summary of results for five <strong>crop</strong> treatment comparisons (<strong>de</strong>tailed in previous Figures and Tables).<br />
Treatment comparison<br />
Criteria Time<br />
Crop type Species<br />
Sowing<br />
season<br />
Cutting Tillage in<br />
frequency inter<strong>crop</strong><br />
Annual vs. Dactylis vs.<br />
Perennial Medicago<br />
Spring vs.<br />
3 vs. 5/year<br />
Autumn<br />
With vs.<br />
<strong>with</strong>out<br />
Emerged weed plants<br />
Density (Fig. 12A, Fig. 13)<br />
Beginning P >> An<br />
End An >> P<br />
=<br />
M > D<br />
=<br />
D: A > S<br />
=<br />
=<br />
=<br />
T+ >~ T-<br />
Diversity (Fig. 12B)<br />
Beginning P >> An<br />
End An >> P<br />
=<br />
M >> D<br />
S > A<br />
S > A<br />
=<br />
C- >~ C+<br />
=<br />
=<br />
Ratio richness/abundance (Fig. 12C)<br />
Beginning An >> P<br />
End P >> An<br />
=<br />
D > M<br />
A >~ S<br />
=<br />
=<br />
=<br />
=<br />
=<br />
Biomass (Fig. 17)<br />
Beginning<br />
End<br />
P > An<br />
An >> P<br />
D > M<br />
=<br />
S >> A<br />
=<br />
=<br />
=<br />
=<br />
=<br />
Species composition (Table 9)<br />
Beginning<br />
End<br />
≠ ≠<br />
≠ ≠ ≠<br />
=<br />
≠ ≠<br />
≠ ≠<br />
≠<br />
=<br />
M: ≠<br />
=<br />
≠<br />
End; last months of the experiment; Beginning; first months of the experiment; An, Succession of annual <strong>crop</strong>s;<br />
P, Perennial <strong>crop</strong>s; D, Dactylis glomerata; M, Medicago sativa;<br />
S, Spring-sown; A, Autumn sown perennial<br />
<strong>crop</strong>s; C-, cut 3 times per year; C+, 5 cuts/year; T-, <strong>with</strong>out soil tillage during inter<strong>crop</strong>s; T+, <strong>with</strong> soil tillage;<br />
>>, much higher than (white cells); >, higher than (light grey cells); >~, tends to be higher than (grey cells); S: /<br />
D:, differences exist only for Spring-sown / Dactylis <strong>crop</strong>s; ≠ ≠ ≠, very strong differences (white); ≠ ≠, strong<br />
differences (light grey); ≠, medium differences (grey); =, no differences (black).<br />
95