14.08.2013 Views

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

Diversifying crop rotations with temporary grasslands - Université de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C.II.3.1.2 Dynamics of weed community composition<br />

After 2.5 years of contrasted <strong>crop</strong> management, the species composition of the emerged weed<br />

communities differed most strongly between all annual <strong>crop</strong> and all perennial <strong>crop</strong> treatments,<br />

as shown by the pairwise multivariate comparisons using the MRPP permutation technique<br />

(Table 9). The magnitu<strong>de</strong> of the differences, indicated by the MRPP-A statistic (‘<strong>with</strong>in group<br />

agreement’), was strongest and always significant for all pairwise comparisons between<br />

annual <strong>crop</strong>s and perennial cocksfoot <strong>crop</strong>s (A-values varied between 0.48**** and 0.51****,<br />

see the first nine lines in Table 9). Pairwise differences between annual <strong>crop</strong>s and perennial<br />

alfalfa <strong>crop</strong>s were also highly significant and their magnitu<strong>de</strong>s came at the second place (A<br />

varied between 0.36**** and 0.45****) followed by the differences between cocksfoot and<br />

alfalfa <strong>crop</strong>s (A = 0.28**** - 0.41****, Table 9).<br />

The differences between annual and perennial <strong>crop</strong>s increased <strong>with</strong> time (see first 18 lines in<br />

Table 9).<br />

In contrast, differences between spring and autumn sown perennial <strong>crop</strong>s were very<br />

strong during the first year (A = 0.27**** - 0.44****) and <strong>de</strong>creased <strong>with</strong> time. At the end of<br />

the experiment, differences between spring and autumn sown <strong>crop</strong>s were lower than all other<br />

contrasts mentioned above, and only significant for alfalfa <strong>crop</strong>s (A = 0.23****) but not for<br />

cocksfoot (A=0.05 ns). For alfalfa <strong>crop</strong>s, weed communities differed significantly between the<br />

treatments <strong>with</strong> high and low cutting frequency at nearly all observation dates since these<br />

contrasted cutting treatments were set up in 2007. However, the amplitu<strong>de</strong> of these differences<br />

were mostly weaker than the other differences mentioned above (A = 0.10** - 0.27****). In<br />

contrast, cutting frequency had no significant impact on species composition for cocksfoot<br />

<strong>crop</strong>s at most observation dates (see Table 9 for <strong>de</strong>tails).<br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!