iSHELL progress
iSHELL progress
iSHELL progress
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>iSHELL</strong> <strong>progress</strong><br />
1
<strong>iSHELL</strong> Progress<br />
Current Personnel<br />
• Tokunaga – PI, project management, science case<br />
• Rayner – science case, science requirements, optical<br />
design, thermal design, calibration, alignment plan<br />
• Bond – system requirements, mechanical design,<br />
mechanisms, optical layout, cryostat design, optomechanical<br />
tolerances, alignment plan<br />
• Bonnet – mechanisms, detector mounts (with IRTF<br />
student Alain Khayat)<br />
• Muller – mechanical design, mechanisms, cryostat<br />
design<br />
• Denault, Lockart, Warmbier – array controller,<br />
instrument control (software and electronics)<br />
6/21/12 2
Project Developments<br />
<strong>iSHELL</strong> Progress<br />
• Preliminary Design Review (PDR) for optomechanical,<br />
software, electronics and Critical Design Review (CDR)<br />
for optics set for about August 2012<br />
• <strong>iSHELL</strong> post-doc position offered to Yuri Belitsky but he<br />
declined. Position is being re-advertised<br />
• IfA student Louis Scudari working with Rayner on<br />
<strong>iSHELL</strong> simulator<br />
• JPL/Chas Beichman seeking support from NASA<br />
astrophysics for ground-based RV surveys. Proposal<br />
would include funds for <strong>iSHELL</strong> gas cells and RV<br />
survey<br />
6/21/12 3
<strong>iSHELL</strong> Progress<br />
Remaining optical design tasks to CDR<br />
• Immersion grating specs ✔<br />
• Refractive camera versus TMA/FMA ✔<br />
• Final optical element specs ✔<br />
• Final XD grating specs ✔<br />
• Final order sorting filter specs ✔<br />
• Final ghost image analysis and baffling ✖ (50%)<br />
• Final calibration system design and layout ✖ (50%)<br />
• Optical alignment plan ✖ (50%)<br />
• Optical element mounts ✖<br />
• Negotiate irregularity specs with vendors ✖<br />
6/21/12 4
Silicon immersion gratings<br />
• Wavefront RMS 3 x worse than specified<br />
• Need to wait for better gratings (better profile,<br />
and lower scattered light)<br />
6/21/12 5
Immersion grating report<br />
D. Jaffe, Univ. of Texas at Austin<br />
01 Feb. 2012
Completed Silicon Immersion Grating for UT’s IGRINS Instrument (July 2011)<br />
/23'456'7089:;
Front-surface interferogram of the IGRINS<br />
grating with a 25mm collimated beam at<br />
633nm. Surface error is 0.17 wave (1/6<br />
wave) peak-to-valley (excellent grating but<br />
note the stripes which represent a 5nm<br />
periodic error).<br />
Diffraction-limited (R=330,000) PSF of the<br />
IGRINS grating at 1.5 microns in immersion (in<br />
red), compared to a mirror PSF).
Efforts for <strong>iSHELL</strong> Grating. Pursuing:<br />
• Improved contact lithography at UT.<br />
• E-beam lithography in collaboration with JPL.<br />
Grating E06<br />
Contact lithograph prototype<br />
at UT tested in 2011 has 0.3<br />
waves peak-to-valley.<br />
Conclusion is that we need<br />
to improve reactive ion etch<br />
process to keep edges from<br />
folding down. This is well<br />
along.
Interferometry of e-beam patterned parts made at JPL<br />
E09- May 2011. No e-beam stage drift nor current correction<br />
E12- May 2011. E-beam stage drift and current correction every 10 minutes<br />
Color scale is surface error in<br />
waves. These pieces took<br />
about 24 hours of e-beam<br />
time, for a 30x 80 mm pattern<br />
The left figure is the<br />
measurement. The right<br />
shows a model of low-order<br />
Zernike terms.<br />
P-V value of 0.15 waves, or<br />
about half of the contact<br />
lithography wavefront error<br />
from the previous slide
Plans:<br />
• JPL making holders for 30mm thick pieces that are needed for<br />
the <strong>iSHELL</strong> grating. Plan is to pattern the L and M band grating<br />
on the next attempt.<br />
• We have built holders at UT for reactive ion etching to reduce<br />
edge droop. Will try another contact version of the L and M<br />
grating if there are problems or delays with the JPL e-beam<br />
attempt.<br />
• Patterning/etching step is the key. Once that is completed, the<br />
rest is routine and will take 6-8 months. Goal is to have the<br />
patterned/etched L and M band part by the end of March. J-K<br />
will follow.
<strong>iSHELL</strong> Progress<br />
Reflective Camera Design from L-3 (SSG)<br />
• Proposed three-mirror solution, good image quality<br />
• Optimum for throughput and scattered light<br />
• Fits in instrument envelope<br />
• Possible issue with 10% image distortion across focal<br />
plane (1% with refractive camera)<br />
• Cost of $500k is too expensive for the project (delivery<br />
of fully tested and aligned system)<br />
6/21/12 13
6/21/12 14
<strong>iSHELL</strong> Progress<br />
Refractive Camera Lens from OSI, Inc.<br />
• BaF 2 – ZnSe – ZnS – LiF<br />
• $60k-$90k, delivery 6-9 months<br />
• BBAR coats $10k-$16k<br />
6/21/12 15
<strong>iSHELL</strong> Progress<br />
Remaining mechanical design tasks to PDR<br />
6/21/12 16
<strong>iSHELL</strong> Progress<br />
Remaining mechanical design tasks to PDR<br />
6/21/12 18
<strong>iSHELL</strong> Progress<br />
Mechanical design next major tasks<br />
• Continued development of the cryostat design –<br />
layout, assembly, access, baffling<br />
• Development of the calibration box can be brought<br />
forward (has been lower priority)<br />
• Mechanism refinements based on the updated<br />
optical bench<br />
• Final thermal and flexure calculations for latest<br />
design including all PDR level subsystems<br />
6/21/12 19
<strong>iSHELL</strong> Progress<br />
Cryostat Structure (concept):<br />
• One optical bench with the fore-optics and<br />
spectrograph on opposite sides<br />
• Optical bench is milled from a single ingot of<br />
aluminum<br />
• Four-point mounting scheme for optical bench<br />
• Nested light-tight shield, actively cooled shield, and<br />
vacuum jacket<br />
• Layout provides good access and ease of assembly<br />
but is traded off against increased volume (<strong>iSHELL</strong><br />
0.47 m 3 cf SpeX 0.54 m 3 )<br />
6/21/12 20