14.08.2013 Views

iSHELL progress

iSHELL progress

iSHELL progress

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>iSHELL</strong> <strong>progress</strong><br />

1


<strong>iSHELL</strong> Progress<br />

Current Personnel<br />

• Tokunaga – PI, project management, science case<br />

• Rayner – science case, science requirements, optical<br />

design, thermal design, calibration, alignment plan<br />

• Bond – system requirements, mechanical design,<br />

mechanisms, optical layout, cryostat design, optomechanical<br />

tolerances, alignment plan<br />

• Bonnet – mechanisms, detector mounts (with IRTF<br />

student Alain Khayat)<br />

• Muller – mechanical design, mechanisms, cryostat<br />

design<br />

• Denault, Lockart, Warmbier – array controller,<br />

instrument control (software and electronics)<br />

6/21/12 2


Project Developments<br />

<strong>iSHELL</strong> Progress<br />

• Preliminary Design Review (PDR) for optomechanical,<br />

software, electronics and Critical Design Review (CDR)<br />

for optics set for about August 2012<br />

• <strong>iSHELL</strong> post-doc position offered to Yuri Belitsky but he<br />

declined. Position is being re-advertised<br />

• IfA student Louis Scudari working with Rayner on<br />

<strong>iSHELL</strong> simulator<br />

• JPL/Chas Beichman seeking support from NASA<br />

astrophysics for ground-based RV surveys. Proposal<br />

would include funds for <strong>iSHELL</strong> gas cells and RV<br />

survey<br />

6/21/12 3


<strong>iSHELL</strong> Progress<br />

Remaining optical design tasks to CDR<br />

• Immersion grating specs ✔<br />

• Refractive camera versus TMA/FMA ✔<br />

• Final optical element specs ✔<br />

• Final XD grating specs ✔<br />

• Final order sorting filter specs ✔<br />

• Final ghost image analysis and baffling ✖ (50%)<br />

• Final calibration system design and layout ✖ (50%)<br />

• Optical alignment plan ✖ (50%)<br />

• Optical element mounts ✖<br />

• Negotiate irregularity specs with vendors ✖<br />

6/21/12 4


Silicon immersion gratings<br />

• Wavefront RMS 3 x worse than specified<br />

• Need to wait for better gratings (better profile,<br />

and lower scattered light)<br />

6/21/12 5


Immersion grating report<br />

D. Jaffe, Univ. of Texas at Austin<br />

01 Feb. 2012


Completed Silicon Immersion Grating for UT’s IGRINS Instrument (July 2011)<br />

/23'456'7089:;


Front-surface interferogram of the IGRINS<br />

grating with a 25mm collimated beam at<br />

633nm. Surface error is 0.17 wave (1/6<br />

wave) peak-to-valley (excellent grating but<br />

note the stripes which represent a 5nm<br />

periodic error).<br />

Diffraction-limited (R=330,000) PSF of the<br />

IGRINS grating at 1.5 microns in immersion (in<br />

red), compared to a mirror PSF).


Efforts for <strong>iSHELL</strong> Grating. Pursuing:<br />

• Improved contact lithography at UT.<br />

• E-beam lithography in collaboration with JPL.<br />

Grating E06<br />

Contact lithograph prototype<br />

at UT tested in 2011 has 0.3<br />

waves peak-to-valley.<br />

Conclusion is that we need<br />

to improve reactive ion etch<br />

process to keep edges from<br />

folding down. This is well<br />

along.


Interferometry of e-beam patterned parts made at JPL<br />

E09- May 2011. No e-beam stage drift nor current correction<br />

E12- May 2011. E-beam stage drift and current correction every 10 minutes<br />

Color scale is surface error in<br />

waves. These pieces took<br />

about 24 hours of e-beam<br />

time, for a 30x 80 mm pattern<br />

The left figure is the<br />

measurement. The right<br />

shows a model of low-order<br />

Zernike terms.<br />

P-V value of 0.15 waves, or<br />

about half of the contact<br />

lithography wavefront error<br />

from the previous slide


Plans:<br />

• JPL making holders for 30mm thick pieces that are needed for<br />

the <strong>iSHELL</strong> grating. Plan is to pattern the L and M band grating<br />

on the next attempt.<br />

• We have built holders at UT for reactive ion etching to reduce<br />

edge droop. Will try another contact version of the L and M<br />

grating if there are problems or delays with the JPL e-beam<br />

attempt.<br />

• Patterning/etching step is the key. Once that is completed, the<br />

rest is routine and will take 6-8 months. Goal is to have the<br />

patterned/etched L and M band part by the end of March. J-K<br />

will follow.


<strong>iSHELL</strong> Progress<br />

Reflective Camera Design from L-3 (SSG)<br />

• Proposed three-mirror solution, good image quality<br />

• Optimum for throughput and scattered light<br />

• Fits in instrument envelope<br />

• Possible issue with 10% image distortion across focal<br />

plane (1% with refractive camera)<br />

• Cost of $500k is too expensive for the project (delivery<br />

of fully tested and aligned system)<br />

6/21/12 13


6/21/12 14


<strong>iSHELL</strong> Progress<br />

Refractive Camera Lens from OSI, Inc.<br />

• BaF 2 – ZnSe – ZnS – LiF<br />

• $60k-$90k, delivery 6-9 months<br />

• BBAR coats $10k-$16k<br />

6/21/12 15


<strong>iSHELL</strong> Progress<br />

Remaining mechanical design tasks to PDR<br />

6/21/12 16


<strong>iSHELL</strong> Progress<br />

Remaining mechanical design tasks to PDR<br />

6/21/12 18


<strong>iSHELL</strong> Progress<br />

Mechanical design next major tasks<br />

• Continued development of the cryostat design –<br />

layout, assembly, access, baffling<br />

• Development of the calibration box can be brought<br />

forward (has been lower priority)<br />

• Mechanism refinements based on the updated<br />

optical bench<br />

• Final thermal and flexure calculations for latest<br />

design including all PDR level subsystems<br />

6/21/12 19


<strong>iSHELL</strong> Progress<br />

Cryostat Structure (concept):<br />

• One optical bench with the fore-optics and<br />

spectrograph on opposite sides<br />

• Optical bench is milled from a single ingot of<br />

aluminum<br />

• Four-point mounting scheme for optical bench<br />

• Nested light-tight shield, actively cooled shield, and<br />

vacuum jacket<br />

• Layout provides good access and ease of assembly<br />

but is traded off against increased volume (<strong>iSHELL</strong><br />

0.47 m 3 cf SpeX 0.54 m 3 )<br />

6/21/12 20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!