Stone v. Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc. - How Appealing
Stone v. Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc. - How Appealing
Stone v. Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc. - How Appealing
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The concept of waiver grew up against this backdrop. In broad strokes, “waiver” in the<br />
present context means that a court may affirm an arbitration award “where a party contesting the<br />
award either knew or should have known about the conflict giving rise to the contestation,” despite<br />
the responsibility of arbitrators to disclose. Merrick T. Rossein, 1 Emp’t Discrimination Law & Litig.<br />
§ 13:75.50 (2011). “The waiver principle is meant to actuate the policy of the FAA in favoring the<br />
finality of arbitration awards [as] well as reinforce arbitration as a cost-effective means of settling<br />
disputes.” Id.<br />
Case 2:11-cv-05118-LDD Document 22 Filed 05/29/12 Page 30 of 35<br />
The Third Circuit has never published a precedential opinion on whether, and under what<br />
circumstances, the waiver doctrine applies to failure-to-disclose-type challenges to arbitration awards.<br />
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, <strong>Inc</strong>. v. Clemente, 272 Fed. App’x 174, 176 n.4 (3d Cir.<br />
2008). <strong>How</strong>ever, the Third Circuit has generally approved of waiver in the arbitration context. See<br />
Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of N. Am., Local 195, AFL-CIO v. Cross Bros.<br />
Meat Packers, <strong>Inc</strong>., 518 F.2d 1113, 1121 n.19 (3d Cir. 1975) (remarking that “a ‘loser is not permitted<br />
for the first time to raise an objection to the arbitration panel after the award has been made.’”)<br />
(citation omitted). Additionally, a Third Circuit panel has held that waiver may apply to an<br />
arbitration loser’s evident partiality challenge. See Arco Enters., <strong>Inc</strong>. v. Operative Plasterers’ &<br />
Cement Masons’ Int’l Ass’n of U.S. & Canada, Local No. 31, 124 Fed. App’x 710, 713 (3d Cir.<br />
2005) (non-precedential). Given all this, as well as (1) the importance of the finality of arbitration<br />
awards and (2) the need to curtail undesirable tactical behavior by losing parties grasping for a re-do,<br />
we believe the Third Circuit would endorse the idea of waiver in failure-to-disclose-type arbitration<br />
award challenges (in the appropriate circumstances, of course).<br />
But that does not end our inquiry. <strong>Co</strong>urts have split on the conditions precedent for waiver to<br />
apply. Some courts limit waiver to situations in which the party seeking review of an arbitration<br />
30