In the Superior Court of Pennsylvania - How Appealing
In the Superior Court of Pennsylvania - How Appealing
In the Superior Court of Pennsylvania - How Appealing
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Q: Well, when I asked <strong>the</strong> first question, “Has your doctor told you<br />
that your breast cancer is caused by hormone <strong>the</strong>rapy,” and you said,<br />
“Not in so many words”; right? Is that right?<br />
A: Is that what I said?<br />
Q: And <strong>the</strong>n, my next question was, “Well, in what words are you<br />
thinking <strong>the</strong>y told you that?” And you said. “They told me it was<br />
estrogen receptor positive”; right?<br />
A: And it is — it was.<br />
Q: Absolutely, that’s what <strong>the</strong> records say about it?<br />
A: That’s right.<br />
Attachments at 10–11.<br />
R.188a.<br />
Q: It is estrogen receptor positive. Did you think that meant that<br />
your breast cancer was caused by hormone <strong>the</strong>rapy?<br />
A: Yes. I guess. Yes.<br />
Later in her deposition, however, Mrs. Coleman clarified her response:<br />
Q: Is <strong>the</strong>re anything about your answer you want to change?<br />
A: The doctor and I never discussed hormone <strong>the</strong>rapy as a cause. I<br />
have seen it in <strong>the</strong> medium — media, 2003 or so, and that was my<br />
recollection <strong>of</strong> when I thought it was — might have been breast cancer<br />
related — you know related.<br />
Q: All right. So, is your testimony now that when <strong>the</strong> doctor told<br />
you that your cancer was estrogen receptor positive, is your testimony,<br />
now, after this break, that you don’t think that meant it was related to<br />
hormones?<br />
A: At <strong>the</strong> time, I — we did not discuss it, and I — I never gave it a<br />
thought as to that.<br />
– 18 –