In the Superior Court of Pennsylvania - How Appealing

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Cases TABLE OF AUTHORITIES – ii – Page Andonagui v. May Dep’t Stores Co., 128 Cal. App. 4th 435, 27 Cal. Rptr. 3d 145 (Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. 2005) ........................................... 12 Bigansky v. Thomas Jefferson Univ. Hosp., 658 A.2d 423 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1995) .................................................................. 43 Carns v. Yingling, 594 A.2d 337 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1991) .............................................. 43 Coleman v. Wyeth Pharm., Inc., 6 A.3d 502 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2010) ................ 37, 38, 40 Crouse v. Cyclops Indus., 560 Pa. 394, 745 A.2d 606 (2000) ................................ 23–25 Deutsch v. Wyeth, HRT Mass Tort Case, MID–L–998–06 MT (N.J. Super. Ct. Law Div.) (June 14, 2007) ...................................................... 35 Fine v. Checcio, 582 Pa. 253, 870 A.2d 850 (2005) ................................... 23–28, 42, 43 Fox v. Ethicon Endo–Surgery, Inc., 35 Cal. 4th 797, 110 P.3d 914, 27 Cal. Rptr. 3d 661 (2005) ............................................................................... 13 Gleason v. Borough of Moosic, No. 7 MAP 2010 (Pa., limited allowance granted Feb. 23, 2010) .............. 38–40 Ingento v. AC&S, Inc., 633 A.2d 1172 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1993) ..................................... 43 Love v. Raymark Indus., Inc., 633 A.2d 1185 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1993) .......................... 43 McCreary v. Wyeth, No. CV04–1699 (2d Dist. Ct. Nev.) (Apr. 5, 2007) ..................... 35 Mojica v. 4311 Wilshire, LLC, 131 Cal. App. 4th 1069, 31 Cal. Rptr. 3d 887 (Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. 2005) ........................................... 12 Scroggin v. Wyeth (In re Prempro Products Liability Litig.), 586 F.3d 547 (8th Cir. 2009) ............................................................................. 34 Scroggin v. Wyeth, 2007 WL 3228125 (E.D. Ark. Nov. 1, 2007) ................................ 34
Simon v. Wyeth Pharm., Inc., 989 A.2d 356 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2009) ...............................19–21, 29, 32, 33, 39, 40 Wilson v. El–Daief, 600 Pa. 161, 964 A.2d 354 (2009) ........................ 23, 25–28, 42, 43 Statutes Calif. Code. Civ. P. §335.1 ........................................................................................... 12 Court Rules Pa. R. App. P. 1114 .................................................................................................. 3, 22 Pa. R. App. P. 1115(d) ............................................................................................ 21, 23 Pa. R. Civ. P. 227.1(e) .................................................................................................. 21 Other Authorities “Risks and Benefits of Estrogen Plus Progestin in Healthy Postmenopausal Women: Principal Results From the Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Trial,” Journal of the American Medical Association, Volume 288, No. 3, at page 321 (July 17, 2002) (available online at: http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/288/3/321.pdf) ................ passim Summary of the Evidence of the Risks and Benefits of Postmenopausal Use of Hormones, BenchMarks (Aug. 20, 2002) (available online at: http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/archive/benchmarks-vol2- issue8/page2) ..................................................................................................... 10 – iii –
Page 1 and 2: In the Supreme Court of Pennsylvani
Page 15: TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCT
Page 19 and 20: ule issue in these 14 cases as a ma
Page 21 and 22: II. COUNTER-STATEMENT OF THE CASE A
Page 23 and 24: Attachments to Pa. Super. Ct. Brief
Page 25 and 26: products. R.1678a, 1682a. It is not
Page 27 and 28: The results of the WHI received wid
Page 29 and 30: By affidavit, Mrs. Manalo explained
Page 31 and 32: with physicians about breast cancer
Page 33 and 34: fact sheets that they had discussed
Page 35 and 36: Q: Well, when I asked the first que
Page 37 and 38: east cancer but less than two years
Page 39 and 40: would have necessarily decided that
Page 41 and 42: which this Court has described as
Page 43 and 44: And, although “there are [very] f
Page 45 and 46: to sue had expired, that her surgeo
Page 47 and 48: articles per day nationwide. Larger
Page 49 and 50: • A clinical trial of combination
Page 51 and 52: Moreover, the Superior Court’s re
Page 53 and 54: summary judgment in these 14 appeal
Page 55 and 56: Defendants’ argument appears to b
Page 57 and 58: demonstrating that the Superior Cou
Page 59 and 60: Pennsylvania law concerning limitat
Page 61 and 62: IV. CONCLUSION be denied. For the r
Page 63: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby cer

In the Superior Court of Pennsylvania - How Appealing

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?