Los Angeles County Self-Assessment Report

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Measure C3.1 Exits to Permanency (24 Months in Care) Of all children in foster care for 24 months or longer on the first day of the year, what percent were discharged to a permanent home by the end of the year and prior to turning 18? Jul 04 – Jun 05 Jul 05 – Jun 06 Jul 06 – Jun 07 National Standard/Goal Direction? Percent Change California 19.1 18.1 17.8 29.1 No -6.81% Los Angeles 19.6 18.6 17.7 29.1 No -9.69% Measure C3.2 Exits to Permanency (Legally Free at Exit) Of all children discharged from foster care during the year who were legally free for adoption, what percent were discharged to a permanent home prior to turning 18? Jul 04 – Jun 05 Jul 05 – Jun 06 Jul 06 – Jun 07 National Standard/Goal Direction? Percent Change California 97.6 97.2 97.2 98 No -0.41% Los Angeles 97 96.6 96.7 98 No -0.31% Measure C3.3 In Care 3 Years or Longer (Emancipated/Age 18) Of all children in foster care during the year who were either discharged to emancipation or turned 18 while still in care, what percent had been in foster care for 3 years or longer? Jul 04 – Jun 05 Jul 05 – Jun 06 Jul 06 – Jun 07 National Standard/Goal Direction? Percent Change California 64 62.5 61.4 37.5 Yes ☺ -4.06% Los Angeles 68.1 65.8 64.2 37.5 Yes ☺ -5.73% 38
Measure C4.1 Placement Stability (8 Days to 12 Months in Care) Of all children served in foster care during the year who were in foster care at least 8 days but less than 12 months, what percent had two or fewer placement settings? Jul 04 – Jun 05 Jul 05 – Jun 06 Jul 06 – Jun 07 National Standard/Goal Direction? Percent Change California 81.8 81.3 82.4 86 Yes ☺ 0.73% Los Angeles 88.2 87.4 87.1 86 No, however, L.A. is above the National Goal -1.25% Measure C4.2 Placement Stability (12 to 24 Months in Care) Of all children served in foster care during the year who were in foster care for at least 12 months but less than 24 months, what percent had two or fewer placement settings? Jul 04 – Jun 05 Jul 05 – Jun 06 Jul 06 – Jun 07 National Standard/Goal Direction? Percent Change California 59.4 60.6 60.9 65.4 Yes ☺ 5.53% Los Angeles 72.7 71.6 71.8 65.4 No; however, L.A. is above the National Goal -1.24% Measure C4.3 Placement Stability (At Least 24 Months in Care) Of all children served in foster care during the year who were in foster care for at least 24 months, what percent had two or fewer placement settings? Jul 04 – Jun 05 Jul 05 – Jun 06 Jul 06 – Jun 07 National Standard/Goal Direction? Percent Change California 36.2 37.4 34.9 41.8 No -3.59% Los Angeles 41.1 39.4 39.9 41.8 No -3% 39
Page 1 and 2: The Los Angeles County Department o
Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents SECTION III: Chil
Page 5 and 6: SECTION I INTRODUCTION 5
Page 7 and 8: the CDSS - facilitated Focus Groups
Page 9 and 10: English Learning students’ academ
Page 11 and 12: DCFS Caseload by Age: - 15 years 11
Page 13 and 14: · Lastly, the South Bay/Harbor are
Page 15 and 16: SECTION II KEY INITIATIVES AND PROG
Page 17 and 18: identified in Probation’s overall
Page 19 and 20: factor reported by study participan
Page 21 and 22: (Appendix I shows a detailed TDM Ou
Page 23 and 24: Initial FSNA 37.1% n = 5,516 The Pe
Page 25 and 26: Concurrent Planning Redesign (CPR).
Page 27 and 28: In a DCFS research study conducted
Page 29 and 30: extensive improvements in family fu
Page 31 and 32: SECTION III CHILD WELFARE OUTCOMES
Page 33 and 34: Below is a summary chart of Los Ang
Page 35 and 36: Measure C1.1 Percent of Children Re
Page 37: Measure C2.3 Adoption Within 12 Mon
Page 41 and 42: Measure 4A Siblings - Some or All P
Page 43 and 44: Measure 4E (1) ICWA Placement Prefe
Page 45 and 46: Employed Youths Oct 03-Sep 04 Oct 0
Page 47 and 48: Caseload, Referrals, Substantiation
Page 49 and 50: DCFS currently implements various s
Page 51 and 52: Measure S2.1: No maltreatment in fo
Page 53 and 54: are terminated, the court is requir
Page 55 and 56: (including discussion on what would
Page 57 and 58: changes and progress that have been
Page 59 and 60: This consolidated approach to recru
Page 61 and 62: Placement Stability and Ethnicity:
Page 63 and 64: TDMs. The immediate outcomes for Pl
Page 65 and 66: during the past three fiscal period
Page 67 and 68: groups. The recruitment division al
Page 69 and 70: have completed high school, 88 have
Page 71 and 72: Los Angeles County Self-Assessment
Page 89 and 90:
Los Angeles County Self-Assessment
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Agency-Court Cooperation All Childr
Page 173 and 174:
Children’s Deputies Monthly Meeti
Page 175 and 176:
Countywide Criminal Justice Coordin
Page 177 and 178:
Emancipation Program Partnership Fa
Page 179 and 180:
Indian Child Welfare Task Force Int
Page 181 and 182:
Liaison to Alliance for Children's
Page 183 and 184:
National Trauma Network Norwood Hea
Page 185 and 186:
South County Transitional Aged Yout
Page 187 and 188:
SPA 8 Steering Committee Specialize
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
show all

Los Angeles County Self-Assessment Report

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?