Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

13.08.2013 Views

190 GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BARNSTABLE FAMILIES. records that more thau half of the number were left in churcli state. Of these eleven Vassal was of London, but probably not a member of Mr. Lothrop's eliurch in that city. He was the sou of John Vassal, aldermau of London and one of the original patentees of the Massachusetts Colony, and an assistant of the Governor. Hatherly was for a time a merchant in London aud probablv a member of Mr Lothrop's cliuich; but it is proliable that Devon was his native County, and Barnstaple in tliat shire was the port where he fitted his ships and wheie he was principally engaged in business. It is very doubtful wliether any of those who came over in the Chailes and White Angel were Kentish men. Wliy should they travel two hundred miles across the country to Barnstaple when they could take passage from London or some of the adjacent ports. It is evident that one page of Mr. Lothrop's records is missing, that is the list of admission to the church from 163M to 1643, for many of the naujcs of members of the church in Karnstable are not on the list of admissions. To the twenty above named who removed Wil- from Scituate to Barnstable the following six must be added : liam and John Casely, John Crocker, Thomas Lumbert, Isaac Wells, and Thomas Hinckley, making 26 families from Scituate. Barnstable was incorporated June 14, 1639, N. S. Thirteen families had then settled in the town, namely : Rev. Joseph Hull, his son Trustram, and his son-in-law John Bursley, making one family, Thomas Shaw, Austin Bearse, Henry Coggin, James Hamlin, William Tilly, Thomas Aliyn, Lawrence Litchfield, T'homas Huckins, John Smith, Roger Goodspeed, John Scndder and Nathaniel Bacon. Mr. John Mayo and his son Samuel, were early inhabitants, Mr. Mayo having a house when Mr. Lothrop came. Smith, Bacon, Bursley, T. Hull, and S. Mayo, were not householders June 1639. If to the above he added Ahram Blush. Dolar Davis, Thos. Hatch and John Hall, who came in afterwards, it completes the list of townsmen as recorded Jan. 1643-4. There were at least fifteen dwelling-houses in Barnstable in June, 1639. Some who belonged to Mr. Lothrop's church came before October. Mr. Dimmock had built in June; and Thomas Lumbert and Isaac Wells probably had. Nearly all of Mr. Hull's company appear to have been from the west of England, mostly from Devonshire and Somersetshire, perhaps a few came from Wales, on the opposite coast of the Bristol Channel. Barnstaple was the most convenient port for these men, and our Barnstable derived its name from its 'Devonshire namesake, probably because that was the town from which the first settlers sailed. Yarmouth obtained its name in the same manner. The leading men among the first settlers were from Norfolk County, of which Yarmouth was the principal seaport, hence the name. Some particulars respecting Mr. Lothrop's residence in Scituate already given, I shall repeat, in order to give a connected narrative

GENEALOGICAL KOTES OP BARNSTABLE FAMILIES. 191 of events. He arrived m Boston Sept. 18, 1634, and stopped nine days in that town to confer witii friends and decide respecting tiis future movements. He met with many who bad known liim in tiis native land ; all had heard of his labors, and liis sacrifices for the cause of Independency, and all most cordially welcomed him to the shores of New England. Gov. Winthrop notes his arrival, and commends the modesty and the reserve of one who had so prominently, so ably, and so fearlessly, upheld the Puritan faith. Many who had heard him proclaim the truth of eternal life in Kent, and m London, had previously come to New England, and were like sheep without a shepherd, scattered in divers places in the Massachusetts and in the Plymouth Colonies, tseveral had set down in Scituate, and they invited Mr. Lothrop to visit them. On the 27th of September he went down to that place, and was most enthusiastically welcomed by former brethren and urged to again become their pastor. The kindly reception which was extended to him, and the cordial welcomes with which he was greeted, were most gratifying to his feelings, and he resolved that Scituate should be his future home—the fold into which he would gather together the estrays of his scattered flock. His grateful heart believed that the hand of God had opened this door for him,—had at last given him a resting place from his toils. Here, protected by law, he could build up church institutions, and here he and his family could dwell together in peace, surrounded by the loving friends of his youth. Willing hands quickly built a house for his family, of "meane" proportions, and of "meaner" architecture, yet it was a shelter from the storm a place that he could call his own—a blessing from "Him who had not where to lay His head." Mr. Lothrop had probably passed four years of his life a student at Christ's College, Cambridge. To this day the magnificent proportions, the gorgeous splendors, and the architectural beauties of its ancient edifices command the admiration of every beholder. Until his imprisonment he had been accustomed to reside in well built and well furnished dwellings. He could most truly say his house in Scituate was "mearae."' Tue w^alls were made of poles filled between with stones and clay, the roof thatched, the chimney to the mantle of rough stone, and above of cob-work, the windows of oiled paper, and the floors of hand sawed planks. Mr. Lothrop elsewhere calls such structures booths, and says they were open and cold, and in winter a high piled fire had constantly to he kept burning. All the houses in the village were alike—there was no opening for pride to claim supremacy. Mr. Lothrop believed that every event of life is ordained of God for good,—he was therefore content, and the two years that he dwelt under a thatched roof was perhaps the happiest period of a well spent life. With better built and better furnished houses came strifes and contentions, rendering his abode in Scituate unpleasant, and from which, in his let- ter to Gov. Prence, he states, "I desire greatly to be released."

190 GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BARNSTABLE FAMILIES.<br />

records that more thau half <strong>of</strong> the number were left in churcli state.<br />

Of these eleven Vassal was <strong>of</strong> London, but probably not a member<br />

<strong>of</strong> Mr. Lothrop's eliurch in that city. He was the sou <strong>of</strong> John Vassal,<br />

aldermau <strong>of</strong> London and one <strong>of</strong> the original patentees <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Massachusetts Colony, and an assistant <strong>of</strong> the Governor. Hatherly<br />

was for a time a merchant in London aud probablv a member <strong>of</strong><br />

Mr Lothrop's cliuich; but it is proliable that Devon was his native<br />

County, and Barnstaple in tliat shire was the port where he fitted his<br />

ships and wheie he was principally engaged in business. It is very<br />

doubtful wliether any <strong>of</strong> those who came over in the Chailes and<br />

White Angel were Kentish men. Wliy should they travel two hundred<br />

miles across the country to Barnstaple when they could take<br />

passage from London or some <strong>of</strong> the adjacent ports.<br />

It is evident that one page <strong>of</strong> Mr. Lothrop's records is missing,<br />

that is the list <strong>of</strong> admission to the church from 163M to 1643, for<br />

many <strong>of</strong> the naujcs <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> the church in Karnstable are not<br />

on the list <strong>of</strong> admissions. To the twenty above named who removed<br />

Wil-<br />

from Scituate to <strong>Barnstable</strong> the following six must be added :<br />

liam and John Casely, John Crocker, Thomas Lumbert, Isaac<br />

Wells, and Thomas Hinckley, making 26 <strong>families</strong> from Scituate.<br />

<strong>Barnstable</strong> was incorporated June 14, 1639, N. S. Thirteen<br />

<strong>families</strong> had then settled in the town, namely : Rev. Joseph Hull,<br />

his son Trustram, and his son-in-law John Bursley, making one<br />

family, Thomas Shaw, Austin Bearse, Henry Coggin, James Hamlin,<br />

William Tilly, Thomas Aliyn, Lawrence Litchfield, T'homas<br />

Huckins, John Smith, Roger Goodspeed, John Scndder and Nathaniel<br />

Bacon. Mr. John Mayo and his son Samuel, were early<br />

inhabitants, Mr. Mayo having a house when Mr. Lothrop came.<br />

Smith, Bacon, Bursley, T. Hull, and S. Mayo, were not householders<br />

June 1639. If to the above he added Ahram Blush. Dolar<br />

Davis, Thos. Hatch and John Hall, who came in afterwards, it<br />

completes the list <strong>of</strong> townsmen as recorded Jan. 1643-4.<br />

There were at least fifteen dwelling-houses in <strong>Barnstable</strong> in<br />

June, 1639. Some who belonged to Mr. Lothrop's church came<br />

before October. Mr. Dimmock had built in June; and Thomas<br />

Lumbert and Isaac Wells probably had. Nearly all <strong>of</strong> Mr. Hull's<br />

company appear to have been from the west <strong>of</strong> England, mostly<br />

from Devonshire and Somersetshire, perhaps a few came from<br />

Wales, on the opposite coast <strong>of</strong> the Bristol Channel. Barnstaple<br />

was the most convenient port for these men, and our <strong>Barnstable</strong><br />

derived its name from its 'Devonshire namesake, probably because<br />

that was the town from which the first settlers sailed.<br />

Yarmouth obtained its name in the same manner. The leading<br />

men among the first settlers were from Norfolk County, <strong>of</strong><br />

which Yarmouth was the principal seaport, hence the name.<br />

Some particulars respecting Mr. Lothrop's residence in Scituate<br />

already given, I shall repeat, in order to give a connected narrative

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!