Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

13.08.2013 Views

120 GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF EAKNSTABLE FAMILIES. Lumber, died 20th March, 1709-10- 5. IV. James, born in 1631, in England, married Oct. 31, 1655, Sarah Lane, daughter of George of Hingham, died Oct. 4, 1713, aged 82 yrs. 6. V. Edward, probably born in England, married 9th May, 1661, Hannah Cobb, daughter of Elder Henry. He died March 29, 1703. She died Jan. 17, 1729-30, aged 90 years, 3 months, 12 days. 7. VI. John, born in Scituate March 2, 1637-8, baptized March 11, 1637-8, an inhabitant of Barnstable 1670, killed at the Eehobeth battle March 26, 1676. 8. VII. Ephraim, born in Barnstable July 23, 1641, baptized July 25, 1641. He was living in 1663, bntthereis no notice of him after. He was probably dead in 1670. 9. VIII. Sarah, born in Barnstable Feb. 2, 1643-4, baptized Feb. 11, 1643-4, married 1st James Cobb, 26th Dec. 1663, and 2d Jonathan Sparrow, Esq., of Eastham. She died in Barnstable "Feb. 11, 1735, in the 92d year of her age," as recorded on her grave stones, according to the town records 92 years and 9 days. Mr. Deane says he also had Nathaniel 1645, and Joseph 1647. Neither the town colony or church records, confirm this statement. Mr. Savage rejects this addition but gives him a son Jabez, who died unmarried. His authority I do not lind. (3.) Thomas Lewes, son of George, was born in England about the year 1628. He came over with his father when a child of four years, residing about three years in Plymouth, then removed with his father to Scituate, and from thence to Barnstable in 1639. His education was obtained in the new settlements, before public schools had been established. Generally the children of the first comers were better educated than the succeeding generations. The ministers of religion had, at that time, small parishes and smaller salaries, and necessity compelled them to resort to other employment. Many of the early pastors were physicians, and nearly all of them taught a school in the winter, and cultivated their farms in the summer. All of George Lewes's chUdren excepting George were well educated for the times. In the investigation of the history of Thomas Lewes, I have been aided by Thomas Lewis, Jr., Esq., and S. P. Bourne, Esq., of Falmouth. The colonial records, the town and church of Barnstable and of Falmouth, the Probate and the records of the proprietors of Suekenessett have been carefully examined. The result of the investigation is this, he was a son of George Lewes, married and lived in Barnstable as stated, and died in Falmouth after 1703, but these records fail to show where he resided from 1670 to 1677. This gap covers the period when Mr. Deane says he was at Swansea, was Selectman, &c., and had by wife Han-

aBNEALOGIOAIi NOTES OF BARNSTABLE FAMILIES. 121 nah, Samuel, 23d April, 1673, and Hepsibah 15th Nov. 1674. Mr. Deane's statement of his removal to Swansea is apparently right ; but there are other records and other conflicting facts. Thomas Lewis of Lynn, son of Edmund, whose wife was Hannah Baker, removed to Swansea about 1670. I have not space to state all the facts. The evidence in my judgment is conclusive, that Thomas Lewis of Swansea was a son of Edmund of Lynn. The subsequent history of his family is known—he was not a son of George of Barnstable. Thomas Lewis, son of George, resided in Barnstable till 1 662, and probably till 1668, for he was in June that year quali- fied as one of the surveyors of highways. In 1654, the year after his marriage, he owned the easterly part of his father's houselot, adjoining the lot of John Davis. "Quinque Die, April lB56," he bought for £20 the ancient tavern and twelve acre houselot of Thomas Lumbart, Senior, bounded westerly by the lot of Mr. Robert Linnell, northerly by the harbor, and easterly by the lands of Thomas and Joseph Lothrop. This old tavern, the first built in Barnstable,, stood on the houselot now owned by the heiys of Ezra Crowell, deceased. He had hot sqld this estate in April, 1661. June 1, 1658, he was admitted a freeman of the Colony, and his name is on the lists of the freemen of Barnstable, up to Jifne 4, 1686, when Si^ckenesset was incorporated as a town. He was not one of th^ original, proprietors of Suckenesset, and was not admitted, an inhabitant residefit ,ifi that plantation till 1668.* He was clerk of the proprietors from July ,1685 to March 26, 1691, and probably for a much longer period. July 23, 1677, he had lapds alloted to him at Little Neck, near "Wood's Hole. On that lot he had a dwellingTJiQuse, which he _9old with the land Fe]b,. 25, 1689-10, to Jpnathan H^oh, Senipr, of "Sacknesset," tor^^ten- shillings in silver money." ,The dee^ Js in the handwriting of '^Thomas Lewes, Senior," witnessed by "Samuel Ganson and Matthew Price," and was ackppwledged before Col. John Thacher of Yarmouth, justice of the peace. Pep. 17, 1703, nearly fourteen years after it was dated. The lot is described as No. 4 of the Little Neck lots, and as extending "across the Neck to. the Great Horbpur, so called." The handwriting indicates that he was a ready penman, and it ean be easilv read by persons familiar with manuscripts of that date. Few errors occur in the spelling, and the conditions of the grant are clearly stated. The small sum named as purchase money, perhaps *Since writine this I find some evidence that he was of Barnstable in the early part of the -fear 1668, consequently removed that year. All the original proprietors at Suckenesset were not residents. At least one-half of the original grantees were non-resident pronrietors Before Suckenesset was incorporated, June 4, 1686, strictly speaking, all the inhabitants were townsmen of Barnstable, and by admitting an inhabitant at Suckenesset, steictly speaking, was only an admission that the party had become a proprietor by pur- ^chase or otherwise.

aBNEALOGIOAIi NOTES OF BARNSTABLE FAMILIES. 121<br />

nah, Samuel, 23d April, 1673, and Hepsibah 15th Nov. 1674.<br />

Mr. Deane's statement <strong>of</strong> his removal to Swansea is apparently<br />

right ; but there are other records and other conflicting facts.<br />

Thomas Lewis <strong>of</strong> Lynn, son <strong>of</strong> Edmund, whose wife was Hannah<br />

Baker, removed to Swansea about 1670. I have not space to<br />

state all the facts. The evidence in my judgment is conclusive,<br />

that Thomas Lewis <strong>of</strong> Swansea was a son <strong>of</strong> Edmund <strong>of</strong> Lynn.<br />

The subsequent history <strong>of</strong> his family is known—he was not a son<br />

<strong>of</strong> George <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barnstable</strong>.<br />

Thomas Lewis, son <strong>of</strong> George, resided in <strong>Barnstable</strong> till<br />

1 662, and probably till 1668, for he was in June that year quali-<br />

fied as one <strong>of</strong> the surveyors <strong>of</strong> highways. In 1654, the year after<br />

his marriage, he owned the easterly part <strong>of</strong> his father's houselot,<br />

adjoining the lot <strong>of</strong> John Davis. "Quinque Die, April lB56," he<br />

bought for £20 the ancient tavern and twelve acre houselot <strong>of</strong><br />

Thomas Lumbart, Senior, bounded westerly by the lot <strong>of</strong> Mr.<br />

Robert Linnell, northerly by the harbor, and easterly by the lands<br />

<strong>of</strong> Thomas and Joseph Lothrop. This old tavern, the first built<br />

in <strong>Barnstable</strong>,, stood on the houselot now owned by the heiys <strong>of</strong><br />

Ezra Crowell, deceased. He had hot sqld this estate in April,<br />

1661. June 1, 1658, he was admitted a freeman <strong>of</strong> the Colony,<br />

and his name is on the lists <strong>of</strong> the freemen <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barnstable</strong>, up to<br />

Jifne 4, 1686, when Si^ckenesset was incorporated as a town.<br />

He was not one <strong>of</strong> th^ original, proprietors <strong>of</strong> Suckenesset,<br />

and was not admitted, an inhabitant residefit ,ifi that plantation<br />

till 1668.* He was clerk <strong>of</strong> the proprietors from July ,1685 to<br />

March 26, 1691, and probably for a much longer period. July<br />

23, 1677, he had lapds alloted to him at Little Neck, near<br />

"Wood's Hole. On that lot he had a dwellingTJiQuse, which he<br />

_9old with the land Fe]b,. 25, 1689-10, to Jpnathan H^oh, Senipr,<br />

<strong>of</strong> "Sacknesset," tor^^ten- shillings in silver money." ,The dee^ Js<br />

in the handwriting <strong>of</strong> '^Thomas Lewes, Senior," witnessed by<br />

"Samuel Ganson and Matthew Price," and was ackppwledged<br />

before Col. John Thacher <strong>of</strong> Yarmouth, justice <strong>of</strong> the peace. Pep.<br />

17, 1703, nearly fourteen years after it was dated. The lot is described<br />

as No. 4 <strong>of</strong> the Little Neck lots, and as extending "across<br />

the Neck to. the Great Horbpur, so called."<br />

The handwriting indicates that he was a ready penman, and it<br />

ean be easilv read by persons familiar with manuscripts <strong>of</strong> that date.<br />

Few errors occur in the spelling, and the conditions <strong>of</strong> the grant are<br />

clearly stated. The small sum named as purchase money, perhaps<br />

*Since writine this I find some evidence that he was <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barnstable</strong> in the early part <strong>of</strong><br />

the -fear 1668, consequently removed that year. All the original proprietors at Suckenesset<br />

were not residents. At least one-half <strong>of</strong> the original grantees were non-resident pronrietors<br />

Before Suckenesset was incorporated, June 4, 1686, strictly speaking, all the inhabitants<br />

were townsmen <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barnstable</strong>, and by admitting an inhabitant at Suckenesset,<br />

steictly speaking, was only an admission that the party had become a proprietor by pur-<br />

^chase or otherwise.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!