13.08.2013 Views

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BAKN8TABLB FAMILIES. 91<br />

stable in 1652. His name is on the list <strong>of</strong> freeman in <strong>Barnstable</strong><br />

in 1558, 1670, and in 1684.<br />

June 7, 1659, the Colony Court granted liberty to Mr. Thomas<br />

Hinckley, Henry Cobb, Samuel Hinckley, John Jenkins and<br />

Nathaniel Bacon, "to view and purchase a tract <strong>of</strong> land at Saconesset,<br />

soe much as they can conveniently, and they are to have<br />

each <strong>of</strong> them a considerable portion there<strong>of</strong> as the Court shall<br />

think meet, and the rest to be disposed <strong>of</strong> by the Court." Mr.<br />

Thomas Hinckley and Mr. Richard Bourne were authorized to<br />

purchase the said lands <strong>of</strong> the Indians. Subsequently others<br />

were added to the list <strong>of</strong> grantees or proprietors.<br />

At the first division <strong>of</strong> the lands at Suckinesset,* Dec. 3,<br />

1661, Samuel Hinckley signs for himself and John Jenkins. In<br />

1668 he was admitted an inhabitant <strong>of</strong> the plantation, but he did<br />

not long reside there, for four years after he is called <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barnstable</strong>.<br />

June 4, 1686, Suckinesset was incorporated as a town. I<br />

presume by the name <strong>of</strong> Falmouth, but it is not so stated on the<br />

record. Previous to that date Suckinesset plantation was annexed<br />

to <strong>Barnstable</strong>, and it seems difficult to fix precisely the status <strong>of</strong><br />

the residents thereon they had to bear arms in <strong>Barnstable</strong>, and the<br />

territory was in fact a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barnstable</strong>, as Maine was a part <strong>of</strong><br />

Massachusetts before it was admitted to be a State <strong>of</strong> the Union.<br />

In 1684 John Jenkins was a freeman <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barnstable</strong>. He had<br />

deceased in 1690, when his son John <strong>of</strong> Falmouth was made a<br />

freeman <strong>of</strong> that town. The settlement <strong>of</strong> his estate does not appear<br />

on the Probate Records. He probably died during the time<br />

<strong>of</strong> the usurpation <strong>of</strong> Sir Edmond Andros, when it was required<br />

that the estates <strong>of</strong> deceased persons should be settled in the<br />

Perogative Court in Boston. This was an arbitrary act, and unpopular<br />

with the people, and to avoid it, some divided their property<br />

by deeds, not by will. John Jenkins probably did so ; but<br />

as the records are burnt, it cannot now be verified. He was living<br />

in 1684 ;<br />

and probably died soon after, aged about 76 years.<br />

John Jenkins married Feb. 2, 1652-3, Mary, widow <strong>of</strong> John<br />

Ewer <strong>of</strong> Bar|;jstable, a young man who died early in 1652.<br />

Whether or not this was his second marriage, the records afford<br />

no evidence. His children are all recorded as born in <strong>Barnstable</strong>,<br />

though in 1668 he was admitted an inhabitant <strong>of</strong> vSuckinesset.<br />

Tradition says he resided at West <strong>Barnstable</strong> on the estate now<br />

owned by his descendants, Dr. F. H. Jenkins, but this is very<br />

doubtful, in fact the records <strong>of</strong> the laying out <strong>of</strong> the lands furnish<br />

no confirmation <strong>of</strong> the truth <strong>of</strong> the tradition. He probably resided<br />

at first on the Ewer farm. In 1675 the town granted him an<br />

*I prefer this spelllBg, because it accords better with the Indian worde from which it is<br />

compounded. It signiiies a place where black wampum is made. The quohaug, or round<br />

clam, was formerly abundant on the shoies <strong>of</strong> Falmouth. From the dark colored portion<br />

<strong>of</strong> the shell the black wampum, or Indianmoney, was made. It was <strong>of</strong> half the value <strong>of</strong><br />

the white. It was made in the form <strong>of</strong> beads, and strung, and was estimated by the fathom.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!