Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

13.08.2013 Views

HUCKINS. Mr. Thomas Huckins, the ancestor of this family, was born in the year 1617. Of his early history little is known. He came over before he was twenty-one years of age, and was a resident of Boston, or its vicinity,* for he was one of the twenty-three original members of the Ancient and Honorable Artillery Company chartered in 1638, and in 1639 bore its standard. To be the ensign of that company, was a mark of honor. At that time aristocratic notions had far more influence than at the present time, and it was very rare indeed that a young man in the twentysecond year of his age was elected to an office of honor or profit, without he belonged to an influential family in the mother country. His name is written Hutchins, Huckins, Huchens, and Hug- gins, the latter being the manner in which it was pronounced in early times. A Eobert settled in Dover in 1640, who had a son James ; George in Cambridge, freeman 1638 ; John at Newbury, 1640, or earlier ; and Joseph of Boston, married 1657. There was also a Richard Hutchins who requested to be admitted a freeman 19th Oct. 1630, and who probably came over in the fleetwith Gov. Winthrop. There is no record that he took the oath, and Mr. Savage infers that he died that year,or returned home. The names in these early families indicate that they were relatives. Among the wealthy and influential promoters in England, of the settlement of Massachusetts, was a Mr. Thomas Hutchins. He was an assistant of the Governor, while the administration of the affairs of the company were conducted in England. His name *There is some evidence that he was of Dorchester. In 1638 there was a stream on the boundaries between that town and Dedham, called "Hugffins Creek." This was the manner in which the name was proaounced ia early times, and often written. The name of that creek proves that a man of the same name resided in its vicinity, for all the names of creeks and places not having well known Indian or legal names are thus derived. Mr. Richard CoUicut, also a charter member of the Artillery Company, to whom the lands in Barnstable were first granted, was a Dorchester man, and his associates were principally from that town. Thomas Huckins* lot was one of those laid under the authority of Mr. CoUicut, bore one of the earliest dates of grants, Sept. 14, 1640. This combination of circumstances may have been accidental, but in the absence of better evidence, I think that it may be safely inferred that Thomas Huckins was one of the associates of Mr. Richard CoUicut, and one of the earliest settlers in Barnstable.

GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BARNSTABLE FAMILIES. 59 appears in all the records prior to 1630 ; but after the removal it ceases to appear. He did not come over ; but having a pecuniary interest in the success of the settlement, it is probable that those of the name who did come belonged to, or were connected with his family. The fact that our Thomas Huckins, when a young man, and before he had become in any manner distinguished, should have been elected ensign of the Artillery Company, seems to prove that he was connected with influential families. To be able to trace our ancestry to the renowned in the father land, adds nothing to our own merit. When they left their native shores they began as pilgrims in a foreign land, and resolved to be the architects of their own fortunes in life. No patent of nobility granted to an ancestor, can confer so much honor oii a man as to be able to trace his descent from a member of Mr. Robinson or Mr. Lothrop's church. These were honest men, the other may have been a Sir John Fallstaff or a Lord Jeffries, distinguished only for their crimes and debaucheries. Mr. Thomas Huckins was an exemplary member of Mr. Lothrop's church. The criminal calendar records only one charge affecting his moral character. He is charged with having abused a poor servant. No details are given, and no opinion can be formed of the heniousness of the offence. The Colony Court considered itself the guardian of the poor boys sent over as apprentices, and always lent a willing ear to their complaints. There appears not to have been much foundation, for Mr. Huckins was only required to pay the expenses, as he was obliged to do as the boy's master ; no fine nor punishment being imposed on him, and we may therefore safely infer that the oflience was not grievious. As a business man he perhaps had no superior in the colony, certainly not in the town. His neighbor, Nicholas Davis, the quaker, did more business but was not so careful or successful a man. Mr. Huckins had a landing place or wharf near his house, where he discharged and received freights. He was one of the "farmers" or partners that hired the Cape Cod fisheries. In 1670 considerable quantities of tar were manufactured in the colony, and he was appointed one of the purchasers, and instructed to pay eight shillings for small barrels and twelve shillings for large. Oct. 4, 1675, he was appointed Commissary General of the Colony, and had the sole management in procuring supplies, and forwarding them to the soldiers engaged in the Indian war.* The arduous duties of this ofBce he performed ably, and to the entire satisfaction of the court. *Hi8 friend and associate, Mr. ColUcut, held the same office by appointment of the Mass. Colony during the Pequat war, and in my notice of that gentleman I have stated that the business connected with that office prevented him from settling in Barnstable as he had intended.

GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BARNSTABLE FAMILIES. 59<br />

appears in all the records prior to 1630 ; but after the removal it<br />

ceases to appear. He did not come over ; but having a pecuniary<br />

interest in the success <strong>of</strong> the settlement, it is probable that those<br />

<strong>of</strong> the name who did come belonged to, or were connected with his<br />

family. The fact that our Thomas Huckins, when a young man,<br />

and before he had become in any manner distinguished, should<br />

have been elected ensign <strong>of</strong> the Artillery Company, seems to<br />

prove that he was connected with influential <strong>families</strong>. To be able<br />

to trace our ancestry to the renowned in the father land, adds<br />

nothing to our own merit. When they left their native shores<br />

they began as pilgrims in a foreign land, and resolved to be the<br />

architects <strong>of</strong> their own fortunes in life. No patent <strong>of</strong> nobility<br />

granted to an ancestor, can confer so much honor oii a man as to<br />

be able to trace his descent from a member <strong>of</strong> Mr. Robinson or<br />

Mr. Lothrop's church. These were honest men, the other may<br />

have been a Sir John Fallstaff or a Lord Jeffries, distinguished<br />

only for their crimes and debaucheries.<br />

Mr. Thomas Huckins was an exemplary member <strong>of</strong> Mr.<br />

Lothrop's church. The criminal calendar records only one charge<br />

affecting his moral character. He is charged with having abused<br />

a poor servant. No details are given, and no opinion can be<br />

formed <strong>of</strong> the heniousness <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence. The Colony Court considered<br />

itself the guardian <strong>of</strong> the poor boys sent over as apprentices,<br />

and always lent a willing ear to their complaints. There<br />

appears not to have been much foundation, for Mr. Huckins was<br />

only required to pay the expenses, as he was obliged to do as the<br />

boy's master ; no fine nor punishment being imposed on him, and<br />

we may therefore safely infer that the <strong>of</strong>lience was not grievious.<br />

As a business man he perhaps had no superior in the colony, certainly<br />

not in the town. His neighbor, Nicholas Davis, the quaker,<br />

did more business but was not so careful or successful a man.<br />

Mr. Huckins had a landing place or wharf near his house, where<br />

he discharged and received freights. He was one <strong>of</strong> the "farmers"<br />

or partners that hired the Cape Cod fisheries.<br />

In 1670 considerable quantities <strong>of</strong> tar were manufactured in<br />

the colony, and he was appointed one <strong>of</strong> the purchasers, and instructed<br />

to pay eight shillings for small barrels and twelve shillings<br />

for large.<br />

Oct. 4, 1675, he was appointed Commissary General <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Colony, and had the sole management in procuring supplies, and<br />

forwarding them to the soldiers engaged in the Indian war.* The<br />

arduous duties <strong>of</strong> this <strong>of</strong>Bce he performed ably, and to the entire<br />

satisfaction <strong>of</strong> the court.<br />

*Hi8 friend and associate, Mr. ColUcut, held the same <strong>of</strong>fice by appointment <strong>of</strong> the Mass.<br />

Colony during the Pequat war, and in my notice <strong>of</strong> that gentleman I have stated that the<br />

business connected with that <strong>of</strong>fice prevented him from settling in <strong>Barnstable</strong> as he had<br />

intended.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!