Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

13.08.2013 Views

478 GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BAENSTABLE FAMILIES. June 7, 1648, Robert Dennis claimed seven acres of land in the West Field bought of Mr. Hallett. In a deed dated Feb. 20, 1654, the great lot of Mr. Andrew Hallett, deceased, is named. In Lechford's Plain Dealing, he is called a schoolmaster. If so, it is surprising that his son Andrew did not learn to write till some time after he was a married man. However, there were many in those times who could read fluently ; but were unable to write. That was not considered a necessary accomplishment, and it did not necessarily follow that the man who could not write was ignorant ; yet we may safely presume that a teacher of youth would have instructed his own children in the elementary branches of education. His other children were better educated; but, notwithstanding, Andrew was the most respectable and succeeded best in life. Mr. Hallett, as above stated, was called a gentleman, a word that at that time had a very different meaning attached to it, than it has at the present time. When applied to a man, it meant that he was connected with the gentry or wealthy class—that he was not a mechanic or common laborer, and that he had received a good education. Rank and title were more regarded in those days than at the present time. Of the first settlers in Barnstable, about thirty were entitled to be called "goodman," four to be called "mister," and one "gentleman." What his employment was the records do not inform us. He was engaged in too many lawsuits for a teacher, yet Leehford was probably right. He had not been officially employed in the public service, yet the Colony Court decided that he had rendered i some public service and was entitled to a liberal grant, and though objection was made to the amount, yet the Court confirmed it, and the towns of Barnstable and Yarmouth acquiesced. Too few incidents of his life are known to enable us to form a just estimate of his character. That he was a man of some note in the Colony, has already been shown. He speculated in wild lands ; but in doing so he only followed the fashions of the times. Every one traded in land-; from the minister in his pulpit to the cobbler on his bench; He was frequently a party in law suits. They are not always to be avoided ; tor "the over-reaching and the dishonest ought not to be allowed to possess in peace the wealth of others. However, the man of peace, the good citizen and obliging neighbor, very rarely appeals to the law to obtain redress for every offence against his property or his good name. His experience and observation has taught him that it is not the better way. The self-willed, the wayward and the stubborn, as a class, are most frequently engaged in lawsuits. Mr. Hallett did not recover damage in any of his lawsuits, and it may thence be inferred that he was a little stiff-necked, and believed his own to

GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BAKNSTABLE FAMILIES. 479 be the better way, a trait of character which many of his descendants, down to the fifth generation, inherited.* However wayward he may have been, his generous donation to the poor of Yarmouth will ever be remembered, and make us regret that we know so little of the man. If at the present time a man should present a cow to the poor, the act would not be heralded in the newspapers as an act of great benevolence, but in order to form a just estimate of the value of the gift, it must be borne in mind that cattle were then scarce in the Colony, and that a cow was then the equivalent of a good sized farm, or of the wages of a common laborer for a year. There is no record of his death. In the division of the fences in Barnstable Feb. 28, 1647, Mr. or Mrs. Hallett is named, but not in the subsequent division in 1649. This entry is probably in old style, and would be 1648, new. Not much reliance, however, is to be placed in it. He probably died in 1647, as above stated, but if the entry in the division of fences is reliable, in the spring of 1648. Of some of the members of the Hallett family I have spoken in a note. John Hallett, who settled in Scituate, was one of the Conihasset planters in 1646. Mr. Deane calls him a brother of Andrew of Sandwich. Mr. Savage copies from Deane, and remarks that his account is "confused." He has not made it any clearer. Both mix up the families of Andrew, Sen., with that of Andrew, Jr., and hence the confusion. Similarity in the family names of the Scituate and Yarmouth families probably induced Mr. Deane to call them relatives. They probably were ; but John of Scituate was too old a man to be called a son of Andrew, Sen., without some more certain evidence than has yet been obtained. Richard Curtis married "Lydia," daughter of John Hallett, in 1649, presuming her to be bis oldest child, 1609 is as late a period as can be assigned for the birth of the father. In some families there are as great or a greater disparity in the ages of the children, but such cases are rare, and in the absence of records it is not safe to make such presumpt- ions. Mr. Deane had but little exact information respecting the Hallett family. He evidently did not know that there were two *Few men could tell a story more ffracefuUy or better than the late Hon. John Keed. He frequently told the following, remarking that he was an eye-witness. It is a ffood illustration of a peculiar trait of character for which many of the Hallets of other days were noted. Perhaps it was the manner in which the story was told that made it interesting. The fourth Jonathan Hallett and Joshua Hallett were at work together shingling a building. One proposed to put up a stage; the other said, "We can put on two or three courses more without one." The first said to himself, "I can shingle as long as you without a stage, and I will not again propose to put up a stage," and the other made the same resolution. They continued naiung on course after course, both resolved not to yield, till both were seen standing tiptoe bedside the building, nailing on shingles as high above their heads as they could possibly stretch, neither yielded till it was impossible for him to drive another nail. This singular contest attracted spectators, and the merriment which it excited had, perhaps, an influence in inducing them to take a common sense view of the matter and put up a stage.

478 GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BAENSTABLE FAMILIES.<br />

June 7, 1648, Robert Dennis claimed seven acres <strong>of</strong> land in the<br />

West Field bought <strong>of</strong> Mr. Hallett. In a deed dated Feb. 20,<br />

1654, the great lot <strong>of</strong> Mr. Andrew Hallett, deceased, is named.<br />

In Lechford's Plain Dealing, he is called a schoolmaster. If<br />

so, it is surprising that his son Andrew did not learn to write till<br />

some time after he was a married man. However, there were many<br />

in those times who could read fluently ; but were unable to write.<br />

That was not considered a necessary accomplishment, and it did<br />

not necessarily follow that the man who could not write was ignorant<br />

; yet we may safely presume that a teacher <strong>of</strong> youth would<br />

have instructed his own children in the elementary branches <strong>of</strong><br />

education. His other children were better educated; but, notwithstanding,<br />

Andrew was the most respectable and succeeded<br />

best in life.<br />

Mr. Hallett, as above stated, was called a gentleman, a word<br />

that at that time had a very different meaning attached to it, than<br />

it has at the present time. When applied to a man, it meant that<br />

he was connected with the gentry or wealthy class—that he was<br />

not a mechanic or common laborer, and that he had received a<br />

good education. Rank and title were more regarded in those days<br />

than at the present time. Of the first settlers in <strong>Barnstable</strong>,<br />

about thirty were entitled to be called "goodman," four to be<br />

called "mister," and one "gentleman." What his employment<br />

was the records do not inform us. He was engaged in too many<br />

lawsuits for a teacher, yet Leehford was probably right. He had<br />

not been <strong>of</strong>ficially employed in the public service, yet the Colony<br />

Court decided that he had rendered i some<br />

public service and was<br />

entitled to a liberal grant, and though objection was made to the<br />

amount, yet the Court confirmed it, and the towns <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barnstable</strong><br />

and Yarmouth acquiesced.<br />

Too few incidents <strong>of</strong> his life are known to enable us to form<br />

a just estimate <strong>of</strong> his character. That he was a man <strong>of</strong> some<br />

note in the Colony, has already been shown. He speculated in<br />

wild lands ; but in doing so he only followed the fashions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

times. Every one traded in land-; from the minister in his pulpit<br />

to the cobbler on his bench; He was frequently a party in law<br />

suits. They are not always to be avoided ; tor "the over-reaching<br />

and the dishonest ought not to be allowed to possess in peace the<br />

wealth <strong>of</strong> others. However, the man <strong>of</strong> peace, the good <strong>citizen</strong><br />

and obliging neighbor, very rarely appeals to the law to obtain redress<br />

for every <strong>of</strong>fence against his property or his good name.<br />

His experience and observation has taught him that it is not the<br />

better way. The self-willed, the wayward and the stubborn, as a<br />

class, are most frequently engaged in lawsuits. Mr. Hallett did<br />

not recover damage in any <strong>of</strong> his lawsuits, and it may thence be<br />

inferred that he was a little stiff-necked, and believed his own to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!