Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

13.08.2013 Views

396 GENEALOGICAL, NOTES OF BAKNISTAULE FAMILIES. Nathaniel Lumbert, Samuel Lewis, Lieut. Nathaniel Bacon, Jabez Gorham, Sylvanus Gorham, The boundaries given in this grant are indefinite ; but are well known. They included all the land on the north of the carriage way that runs east and west immediately in front of the Meeting House. The East Parish still owns this land, excepting the part east of the pound, where the parsonage house stood, that has been sold. The Parish owns the land where the pound stands ; but it cannot be removed without the consent of the town, and of the parties who are bound to maintain it. Tlie Meeting House was built by twenty-four proprietors in 1717-18, and sold Jan. 25, 1718-19,' to the East Precinct in the town of Barnstable, for the sum of £450 in money. In the deed of conveyance, no land is named, but the parish immediately took possession, and have improved the land to this day, which is a sufficient title. After the above grant was made by the committee of the proprietors of the town, the remainder of the land on Cobb's Hill was reserved for public use, and recorded as follows "A piece of laud of about three acres lying on Cobb's Hill, laid out for public uses pursuant to the vote of the proprietors ; bounded as followeth : southerly by the highway ; westerly by the brook and way round to Lieut. Nathaniel Bacon's, thence by his land to the piece laid out to John Bacon and others, to Samuel Bacon's, and easterly by it to the highway." These boundaries are not clearly stated but are well known. The three acres includes all the land bounded southerly by the present County road ; westerly by the branch of Mill Way that passes on the east of the store of Ebenezer Bacon, till it joins the western branch of that way, thence by that branch till it joins the eastern branch, thence south-easterly by that way to the top of Meeting House Hill, and thence east by the carriage way in front of the Meeting House, to the County road, at a point in front of Major Phinney's barn. To a small portion of this land the town has partially alienated its title. About the year 1800 the town granted to Fraternal Lodge a small lot of land on the east of the school house in the third district, for the purpose of erecting a hall thereon.* *I have been pel-bap's unnecessarily particular and tedious in ray description and history of Roger (joodspeed's original house lots. I have done so, in order that 1 might be instriimental in settling the questions that have arisen relative to the maintainance of the pound, and the improvement of the pound meadows. They can be settled equitably without an appeal to the Courts. These points I think are cleaiuy established. The East Parish though the owner of the soil on which the pound stands, has no right to remove it without the consent of the town, and of the present holders of the pound meadows. 3 3 5 ^ 2

GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BARNSTABLE FAMILIES. 397 Before the year 1653, Roger Goodspeed removed from Goodspeed's Hill to the Indian village of Mistick or Misteake, now known by the more modern and perhaps more euphoneous name of Marston's Mills. I' think he was the first of the whites who settled in that part of the town. His six acre houselot then was bounded southerly by the land of the Indian Sachem Paup-mun-nucks^t ^"d westerly by Oyster River. On the north of this lot he owned a neck of land containing sixteen acres. In 1665 he bought forty acres of land adjoining the Oyster River and the Indian pond of Thomas Allyn. In 1667 the town granted him sixteen acres adjoining his houselot. He also owned meadows in that vicinity. In 1659 he purchased a tract of land of Dea. John Cooper at the east of Cooper's Pond. April 6, 1678, he conveyed all his lands and meadows at South Sea to his sons John and Ebenezer, excepting six acres, on the condition that they support him and his wife Alice during their natural lives. This instrument is on record, and is very carefully drawn. It is signed with his mark. He joined the church in Barnstable July 28, 1644, his wife Alice having joined on 31 of the preceding December. He was admitted a freeman of the Colony June 5, 1651, and was on the grand jury that year. He was a farmer or planter, and had enjoyed no advantages for obtaining an education. He appears to have been an exemplary member of the Christian church, and to have lived, except on one occasion, a quiet and inoffensive life. In 1672, at the Meeting House in Barnstable, he charged John Jenkins with having stolen his kid and lying ; but like an honest The town of Barnstable has no right to remove the pound, without the assent of the holders of said meadow. If the town should order its removal without such assent the latter would be relieved from all obligation to maintain a pound in another place, and could not be dispossessed of said meadows. June 1, 1688. l^e grass that grows on the Pound Meadows was granted to James Lewis and Nathaniel Bacon, for so long a time as they shall maintain a pound for the town's use and no longer. The meadows were not granted, only the right to cut the "common thatch, goose grass or sedge that grows upon them.*' This is a nice distinction but the language used shows the intention of the parties. Lewis and Bacon admitted four others as pai*tners and the meadows were divided into six lots, and the maintenance of certain portions of the pound fence was assi^ed to each lot. In 1778 some of the partners neglected to put up their particular portion of the fence and the town was indicted. That matter was settled, the partners found that they were oblij?ed to put up the fence, and did so. Recently they have again neglected to keep the fence in repair and the town has taken possession of the meadows. This the town had an undoubted right to do ; but a question arises whether or not those partners who have maintained their particular portions of the fence can be deprived of the use of the meadows. On the other hand, it is said that the fjirant was made as a whole, that the division was a subsequent arrangement not binding on the town. The latter is the common sense view of the question. A quadrangular piece of land fenced on three sides ie not a "pound for the town's use." Either of the partners had the same right that the town had. He could have put up the fence and claimed the delinquent's share of the meadow. t Paup-mun-nueks WAfi- the Sachem of Masapee, now called Marshpee, the easterly part of Sandwich and the westerly and central parts of Barnstable. He ever lived on friendly terms with the whites: For several years this ancient and once powerful sagamore resided in the immediate vicinity of Roger Goodspeed.

GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BARNSTABLE FAMILIES. 397<br />

Before the year 1653, Roger Goodspeed removed from Goodspeed's<br />

Hill to the Indian village <strong>of</strong> Mistick or Misteake, now<br />

known by the more modern and perhaps more euphoneous name <strong>of</strong><br />

Marston's Mills. I' think he was the first <strong>of</strong> the whites who<br />

settled in that part <strong>of</strong> the town.<br />

His six acre houselot then was bounded southerly by the land<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Indian Sachem Paup-mun-nucks^t ^"d westerly by Oyster<br />

River. On the north <strong>of</strong> this lot he owned a neck <strong>of</strong> land containing<br />

sixteen acres. In 1665 he bought forty acres <strong>of</strong> land adjoining<br />

the Oyster River and the Indian pond <strong>of</strong> Thomas Allyn.<br />

In 1667 the town granted him sixteen acres adjoining his houselot.<br />

He also owned meadows in that vicinity. In 1659 he purchased<br />

a tract <strong>of</strong> land <strong>of</strong> Dea. John Cooper at the east <strong>of</strong> Cooper's<br />

Pond.<br />

April 6, 1678, he conveyed all his lands and meadows at<br />

South Sea to his sons John and Ebenezer, excepting six acres, on<br />

the condition that they support him and his wife Alice during<br />

their natural lives. This instrument is on record, and is very<br />

carefully drawn. It is signed with his mark.<br />

He joined the church in <strong>Barnstable</strong> July 28, 1644, his wife<br />

Alice having joined on 31 <strong>of</strong> the preceding December. He was<br />

admitted a freeman <strong>of</strong> the Colony June 5, 1651, and was on the<br />

grand jury that year. He was a farmer or planter, and had enjoyed<br />

no advantages for obtaining an education. He appears to<br />

have been an exemplary member <strong>of</strong> the Christian church, and to<br />

have lived, except on one occasion, a quiet and in<strong>of</strong>fensive life.<br />

In 1672, at the Meeting House in <strong>Barnstable</strong>, he charged John<br />

Jenkins with having stolen his kid and lying ; but like an honest<br />

The town <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barnstable</strong> has no right to remove the pound, without the assent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

holders <strong>of</strong> said meadow. If the town should order its removal without such assent the<br />

latter would be relieved from all obligation to maintain a pound in another place, and could<br />

not be dispossessed <strong>of</strong> said meadows.<br />

June 1, 1688. l^e grass that grows on the Pound Meadows was granted to James<br />

Lewis and Nathaniel Bacon, for so long a time as they shall maintain a pound for the town's<br />

use and no longer. The meadows were not granted, only the right to cut the "common<br />

thatch, goose grass or sedge that grows upon them.*' This is a nice distinction but the<br />

language used shows the intention <strong>of</strong> the parties. Lewis and Bacon admitted four others<br />

as pai*tners and the meadows were divided into six lots, and the maintenance <strong>of</strong> certain<br />

portions <strong>of</strong> the pound fence was assi^ed to each lot. In 1778 some <strong>of</strong> the partners<br />

neglected to put up their particular portion <strong>of</strong> the fence and the town was indicted. That<br />

matter was settled, the partners found that they were oblij?ed to put up the fence, and did<br />

so. Recently they have again neglected to keep the fence in repair and the town has taken<br />

possession <strong>of</strong> the meadows. This the town had an undoubted right to do ; but a question<br />

arises whether or not those partners who have maintained their particular portions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fence can be deprived <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> the meadows. On the other hand, it is said that the<br />

fjirant was made as a whole, that the division was a subsequent arrangement not binding on<br />

the town.<br />

The latter is the common sense view <strong>of</strong> the question. A quadrangular piece <strong>of</strong> land<br />

fenced on three sides ie not a "pound for the town's use." Either <strong>of</strong> the partners had the<br />

same right that the town had. He could have put up the fence and claimed the delinquent's<br />

share <strong>of</strong> the meadow.<br />

t Paup-mun-nueks WAfi- the Sachem <strong>of</strong> Masapee, now called Marshpee, the easterly part<br />

<strong>of</strong> Sandwich and the westerly and central parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barnstable</strong>. He ever lived on friendly<br />

terms with the whites: For several years this ancient and once powerful sagamore resided<br />

in the immediate vicinity <strong>of</strong> Roger Goodspeed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!