13.08.2013 Views

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

376 GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BAKNSTABLE FAMILIES.<br />

55. VII. Seth, May 29, 1734.<br />

56. VIII. Hannah, April 9, 1736.<br />

3S. Ebenezer Fuller, brother <strong>of</strong> the preceding, married<br />

Martha Jones, and had,<br />

57. I. David, born Feb. 6, 1725.<br />

68. II. Jonathan, April 9, 1729.<br />

59. III. Daniel, Sept. 16, 1731, married Martha Phinney<br />

Nov. 1, 1753.<br />

60. IV. John, June 3, 1734.<br />

61. V. William, Sept. 27, 1737.<br />

62. VI. Jean, Jan. 12, 1739.<br />

Matthew Fuller was one <strong>of</strong> the prominent men <strong>of</strong> the Old<br />

Colony—and his name is inseparably connected with her annals.<br />

I have neither the time nor the ability to write his biography—to<br />

recount in detail the various services which he rendered to the<br />

country. He was an able man ; but he had his faults, which I<br />

shall not, in this sketch, attempt to palliate or conceal.<br />

He was the son <strong>of</strong> Edward and Anne, and brother <strong>of</strong><br />

Samuel, who came over in 1620, in the Mayflower. His parents<br />

died soon after their arrival at Plymouth. Samuel went to reside<br />

with his uncle, and Matthew remained with his friends in England<br />

till about the year 1640, when he came over. Though he<br />

was then nearly thirty years <strong>of</strong> age, probably a married man and<br />

a parent, yet he was accounted to be "one <strong>of</strong> the first born<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Colony," and had lands assigned in virtue <strong>of</strong> his right <strong>of</strong><br />

primo-geniture. Edward and Anne Fuller had no child born in<br />

this country to claim the lands granted to "the first born ;" and in<br />

all such cases the right was transferred to the eldest child <strong>of</strong> the<br />

same parents, though born in the mother country.<br />

Little is known <strong>of</strong> his early history. This is to be regretted ;<br />

because we delight to trace the successive steps by which an orphan<br />

boy became eminent. It is not known whether he studied<br />

medicine before or after he came over, or whether he was then a<br />

married man and a parent. The best authorities give the year<br />

1640, as the date <strong>of</strong> his coming to Plymouth. The earliest "date<br />

I find is April 5, 1642 ; but it is evident that he had been in the<br />

country some little time, probably two years. If he<br />

come before 1640, he was certainly a married man and a<br />

because his daughter Mary was born as early as 1635.<br />

did not<br />

parent,<br />

In 1642 he had ten acres <strong>of</strong> land assigned to him near Thurston<br />

Clark's, in Plymouth, and as this is the first grant made to<br />

him the presumption is that he had not then been long in the<br />

country. The same year he was a juryman, and propounded to<br />

be a freeman <strong>of</strong> the Colony ;<br />

but was not sworn and admitted till<br />

June 7, 1663.<br />

In 1643 a "military discipline" was established by the Colony<br />

Court, embracing the towns <strong>of</strong> Plymouth, Duxbury and Marsh-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!