Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

13.08.2013 Views

DIMMOGK. ELDER THOMAS DIMMOCK. Elder Thomas Dimmock and Rev. Joseph Hull, are the par- ties named in the grant made in 1639, of the lands in the town of Barnstable. A previous grant has been made to Mr. Richard Collieut of Dorchester, by the Plymouth Colony Court, and subsequent events make it probable, if not certain, that Messrs. Dimmock and Hull were his associates. The date of the first grant is not given ; but it was made either in the latter part of 1 637, or the beginning of 1638. Soon after the first grant was made Mr. Collieut and some of his associates came to Mattakeese, surveyed certain lands, and appropriated some of them to his own particular use ; but he never became an inhabitant of the town, and failing to perform his part of the contract, the grant to him was rescinded and made void ; but individual rights acquired by virtue of the grant to him, were not revoked. In the winter of 1637-8 the Rev. Stephen Batchiler of Lynn, and a small company, consisting mostly of his sons, and his sonsin-law, and their families, attempted to make a settlement in the north-easterly part of the town, at a place yet known as Oldtown ; but they remained only a few months. (See Batchiler.) Some of those who came with Mr. Collieut in 1638, remained and became permanent residents, for in March 1639, Mr. Dimmock was appointed by the Colony Court to exercise the Barnstable men in their arms, proving that there were English residents in the town at that time. April 1, 1639, the Court ordered that only such persons as were then at Mattakeset should remain, and make use of some land, but shall not divide any either to themselves or others, nor receive into the plantation any other persons, excepting those to whom the original grant was made, without the special license and approval of the government. This order implies, that the English who were in Barnstable April 1, 1639, were associates of Mr. Collieut and restricts them from receiving any who were not of that company.

GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BARNSTABLE FAMILIES. 329 May 6, 1639. "It is ordered by the Court, that if Mr. Collicut do come in his own person to inhabit at Mattakeeset before the General Court in June next ensuing ; that then the grant shall remain firm unto them ; but, if he fail to come within the time pre- fixed, that then their grant be made void, and the lands be otherwise disposed of." The language of this order cannot be misunderstood. The Court had granted the lands at Mattakeeset to Mr. Collicut and his associates on the usual conditions, namely, that they should "see to the receiving in of such persons as may be fit to live together there in the fear of G-od, and obedience to our sovereigne lord the King, in peace and love, as becometh Christian people ;" that they should "faithfully dispose of such equal and fit portions of lands unto them and every of them, as the several estates, ranks and qualities of such persons as the Almighty in his providence shall send in amongst them, shall require ; to reserve, for the disposal of the Court, at least acres of good land, with meadow competent, in place convenient, and to make returns to the Court of their doings." These conditions had not been complied with—a month's notice was given—Mr. Collicut did not come in person—and the Court on the 4th of June, 1639, made void the grant to him ; tled in Barnstable.* but not to his associates who had then set- As Mr. Dimmock was of Dorchester he was probably one of the original associates of Mr. Collicut. Mr. Hull and Mr. Bursley of Weymouth, and the other inhabitants of Barnstable, prior to Oct. 21, 1639, with a few exceptions hereinafter named, belonged to the same company. Mattakeeset was incorporated and became a town called Barnstable, on the 4th of June 1639, old stile, or June 14th new stile, lam aware that the Eev. JohnMellen, Jr., in his Topographical description of Barnstable, published in 1794 in the third volume of the Massachusetts Historical Society's collections, says : "There is no account to be found of the first settlement made in this town. Probably there was none made much before its incorporation which was Sept. 3, 1639, O. S. As Mr. Mellen says, there was no record of the act of incorporation made. As early as 1685 when many of the first settlers were living, Gov. Hinckley was appointed a committee of the town, to examine the records and *Mr. Collicut was admitted a freeman of the Massachusetts Colony March 4, 1632-3. He was a deputy to the General Court from Dorchester in 1636, '37 and '55. Selectman in 1636. His business arrangements probably prevented him from coming to Barnstable, as he had intended. May 17, 1637, about the time he and his associates intended to remove, he was appointed Commissaiy, to make provisions for the troops employed in the expedition against the Pequot Indians. In 1638 he was appointed by the Court to rectify the bounds between Dedham and Dorchester, and in 1641 to run the south line of the State adjoining Connecticut. He was one of the company authorized to trade with the Indians, and was much employed in public business. He removed to Boston before 1656. In 1669 he was of Falmouth, now Portland, and in 1672 of Saco, from both of which places he was a representative to the General Court in the years named, He finally returned to Boston, where he died July 7, 1685, aged 83, and was Iniried on Copp's Hill.

GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BARNSTABLE FAMILIES. 329<br />

May 6, 1639. "It is ordered by the Court, that if Mr. Collicut<br />

do come in his own person to inhabit at Mattakeeset before the<br />

General Court in June next ensuing ; that then the grant shall remain<br />

firm unto them ; but, if he fail to come within the time pre-<br />

fixed, that then their grant be made void, and the lands be otherwise<br />

disposed <strong>of</strong>."<br />

The language <strong>of</strong> this order cannot be misunderstood. The<br />

Court had granted the lands at Mattakeeset to Mr. Collicut and<br />

his associates on the usual conditions, namely, that they should<br />

"see to the receiving in <strong>of</strong> such persons as may be fit to live together<br />

there in the fear <strong>of</strong> G-od, and obedience to our sovereigne<br />

lord the King, in peace and love, as becometh Christian people ;"<br />

that they should "faithfully dispose <strong>of</strong> such equal and fit portions<br />

<strong>of</strong> lands unto them and every <strong>of</strong> them, as the several estates,<br />

ranks and qualities <strong>of</strong> such persons as the Almighty in his providence<br />

shall send in amongst them, shall require ; to reserve, for<br />

the disposal <strong>of</strong> the Court, at least acres <strong>of</strong> good land, with<br />

meadow competent, in place convenient, and to make returns to<br />

the Court <strong>of</strong> their doings." These conditions had not been complied<br />

with—a month's notice was given—Mr. Collicut did not<br />

come in person—and the Court on the 4th <strong>of</strong> June, 1639, made<br />

void the grant to him ;<br />

tled in <strong>Barnstable</strong>.*<br />

but not to his associates who had then set-<br />

As Mr. Dimmock was <strong>of</strong> Dorchester he was probably one <strong>of</strong><br />

the original associates <strong>of</strong> Mr. Collicut. Mr. Hull and Mr. Bursley<br />

<strong>of</strong> Weymouth, and the other inhabitants <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barnstable</strong>, prior<br />

to Oct. 21, 1639, with a few exceptions hereinafter named, belonged<br />

to the same company.<br />

Mattakeeset was incorporated and became a town called <strong>Barnstable</strong>,<br />

on the 4th <strong>of</strong> June 1639, old stile, or June 14th new stile,<br />

lam aware that the Eev. JohnMellen, Jr., in his Topographical description<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Barnstable</strong>, published in 1794 in the third volume <strong>of</strong><br />

the Massachusetts Historical Society's collections, says : "There<br />

is no account to be found <strong>of</strong> the first settlement made in this<br />

town. Probably there was none made much before its incorporation<br />

which was Sept. 3, 1639, O. S. As Mr. Mellen says, there<br />

was no record <strong>of</strong> the act <strong>of</strong> incorporation made. As early as 1685<br />

when many <strong>of</strong> the first settlers were living, Gov. Hinckley was<br />

appointed a committee <strong>of</strong> the town, to examine the records and<br />

*Mr. Collicut was admitted a freeman <strong>of</strong> the Massachusetts Colony March 4, 1632-3.<br />

He was a deputy to the General Court from Dorchester in 1636, '37 and '55. Selectman in<br />

1636. His business arrangements probably prevented him from coming to <strong>Barnstable</strong>, as he<br />

had intended. May 17, 1637, about the time he and his associates intended to remove, he<br />

was appointed Commissaiy, to make provisions for the troops employed in the expedition<br />

against the Pequot Indians. In 1638 he was appointed by the Court to rectify the bounds<br />

between Dedham and Dorchester, and in 1641 to run the south line <strong>of</strong> the State adjoining<br />

Connecticut. He was one <strong>of</strong> the company authorized to trade with the Indians, and was<br />

much employed in public business. He removed to Boston before 1656. In 1669 he was <strong>of</strong><br />

Falmouth, now Portland, and in 1672 <strong>of</strong> Saco, from both <strong>of</strong> which places he was a representative<br />

to the General Court in the years named, He finally returned to Boston, where he<br />

died July 7, 1685, aged 83, and was Iniried on Copp's Hill.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!