Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

13.08.2013 Views

254 GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BAKNSTABLE FAMILIES. as Saltern point. This word, Saltern, has now become nearly obsolete. It means a salt work, a building in which salt is made by boiling or solar evaporation. On some ancient records that point is called "salt-pond" point. Who owned or who established this ancient saltern I have been unable to ascertain. It was situated on the Lothrop land, on a parcel that from the situation, I should judge was owned by the Rev. John, and afterwards by his widow Ann. Neither in the wills nor in the settlement of the estates of the Lothrops is any reference had to the salt-work, and I am of the opinion, if the facts in relation to the matter are ever ascertained, they will prove that G-en. James Cudworth was the first who manufactured salt in Barnstable. | Before 1646 he returned to Scituate, and became, Dec. 1, 1646, one of the Conihasset Partners. At that time he resided on the South East of Coleman's hills, in a house which he sold to Thomas Kobinson before 1650. After this, he resided, during life, on his farm near the little Musquashcut pond in Scituate. In 1652 he was appointed captain of the militia company in Scituate ; in 1649-'50-'51-'52-'53-'54-'55 and '56, a representative to the Court ; June 3, 1656, he was chosen an assistant of the Governor, and re-elected in 1657 and 1658. In 1653 he was chosen one of the council of war; March 2, 1657-8 he was discharged, with his own consent, from his office as Captain of the militia company, and in 1659, for the same reason, he was not approved of by the Court as a deputy from Scituate, to which office he had been elected by the people. June 6, 1660, he was required to give bonds, with sufficient surities, for £500 for his appearance at the next October Court, and so from one General Court to another, till the next June, "in reference unto a seditious letter sent for England, the coppy whereof is come over in print." This letter was dated at Scituate in 1658, and was addressed by him to Mr. John Brown, then in England. It has been justly admired for its liberal and Catholic sentiments, clearly and boldly expressed. } In 1624 a man was sent over to establish salt works in Plymouth. Gov. Bradford says he was ignorant of the business, yain and self-willed. The facts indicate that the GoTcrnor was severe in his judgement. It was evident that, in the variable climate of New Englaud, that salt could not be manufactured by solar evaporation, in the mode common in the south of Spain, and in the West India Islands. On the other hand, the smaU proportion of salt contained in sea water would render the English process, by boiling in pans, be too tedious and too expensive. His plan seems to have been to reduce the sea water by solar evaporation in ponds and finis4i the process by boiling in pan's. In selecting the sites for his ponds he was unfortunate, whether, as Governor Bradford says, from a lack of good judgment, or for other reasons, does not appear. The ponds did not prove to be tight, and to correct the fault of the bottom and make it more retentive, he covered it with a coating of clay. Similar ponds are constructed by the salt makers at the present day, and errors in the selection of sites are not always to be avoided by men of good judgement. Before this man (his name is not given) had a fair opportunity to test the value of his works, his buildings and most of his pans there, were unfortunately by flre. The little information preserved respecting the salt work in Barnstable, shows that the method was similar to that adopted by the Plymouth manufacturer. A pond was dug on the high meadow, and a dyke thrown up around it to retain the water, and prevent the ingress of more than was wanted. When the water was reduced to a weak brine by solar evaporation, it was conveyed to pans and the process completed by boiling There was a similar establishment at Pine Hill, Sandwich. . destroyed

GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BARNSTABLE FAMILIES. 255 For the expressions in another letter, addressed by him to the Governor and assistants, he was sentenced at the same court to be disfranchised. At the Court held Oct. 2, 1660, the printed letter of Mr. Cudworth was read, and Mr. John Brown, who was present, testified that he did receive a letter subscribed by James Cudworth, of Scituate, and that, according to his best recollection, it was substantially the same as the one then read. The bonds for £500, of Mr. Cudworth, were cancelled, and the Court ordered that a civil action should be commenced against him at the next following March term of the Court. When the day came, no action was brought. The absurdity of men sitting as judges, in a case where they themselves were the plaintiffs, was too glaring, and they wisely determined to drop the action. The firmness displayed by Gen. Cudworth, in these trying times, will ever be a monument to his memory, more endearing than brass or granite. Rather, than violate his convictions of right and of duty, he submitted to disfranchisement, ejection from office, and to be placed under a bond for a larger sum than the whole colony could have'paid in coin. He did not come over in the Mayflower ; but he had adopted as his own, the principles of those who did, and no earthly power could make him swerve from them. Some speak lightly of those principles ; but it is ignorance of their character which makes them do so. The Pilgrims came over with their bibles in their hands, and that holy book was the only creed, to which mem- in their hearts ; bers of their church were required to give their assent. They held that Christ was the only bishop to whom they owned allegiance, and that the gorgeous vestments of the priests of the Catholic and English churches, and the ceremonial observances required, were anti-Christian, and not in conformity with the usages of the Apostolic age. They came here that they might have liberty to worship God according to the dictates of their own consciences, to establish a pure and simple form of worship for themselves and their posterity. They held that the conscience was free, that man was not responsible to his fellow man for his faith, but to God alone. These principles lie at the bottom of all that is tolerant in religion, liberal in politics, or worth contending for. The Pilgrims took another step in advance of the prevalent opinions of their time. When about to embark from Leyden, their reverend pastor, in his farewell address, says : "I charge you before God and his blessed angels, that you follow me no further than you have seen me follow the Lord Jesus Christ. The Lord has more truth yet to break forth out of his holy word. I cannot suffi- ciently bewail the condition of the reformed churches, who are come to a period in religion, and will go at present no further than the instruments of their reformation, Luther and Calvin were

GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BARNSTABLE FAMILIES. 255<br />

For the expressions in another letter, addressed by him to the<br />

Governor and assistants, he was sentenced at the same court to be<br />

disfranchised.<br />

At the Court held Oct. 2, 1660, the printed letter <strong>of</strong> Mr.<br />

Cudworth was read, and Mr. John Brown, who was present, testified<br />

that he did receive a letter subscribed by James Cudworth,<br />

<strong>of</strong> Scituate, and that, according to his best recollection, it was<br />

substantially the same as the one then read. The bonds for £500,<br />

<strong>of</strong> Mr. Cudworth, were cancelled, and the Court ordered that a<br />

civil action should be commenced against him at the next following<br />

March term <strong>of</strong> the Court. When the day came, no action was<br />

brought. The absurdity <strong>of</strong> men sitting as judges, in a case where<br />

they themselves were the plaintiffs, was too glaring, and they<br />

wisely determined to drop the action.<br />

The firmness displayed by Gen. Cudworth, in these trying<br />

times, will ever be a monument to his memory, more endearing<br />

than brass or granite. Rather, than violate his convictions <strong>of</strong><br />

right and <strong>of</strong> duty, he submitted to disfranchisement, ejection from<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice, and to be placed under a bond for a larger sum than the<br />

whole colony could have'paid in coin. He did not come over in<br />

the Mayflower ; but he had adopted as his own, the principles <strong>of</strong><br />

those who did, and no earthly power could make him swerve from<br />

them. Some speak lightly <strong>of</strong> those principles ; but it is ignorance<br />

<strong>of</strong> their character which makes them do so.<br />

The Pilgrims came over with their bibles in their hands, and<br />

that holy book was the only creed, to which mem-<br />

in their hearts ;<br />

bers <strong>of</strong> their church were required to give their assent. They<br />

held that Christ was the only bishop to whom they owned allegiance,<br />

and that the gorgeous vestments <strong>of</strong> the priests <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Catholic and English churches, and the ceremonial observances<br />

required, were anti-Christian, and not in conformity with the<br />

usages <strong>of</strong> the Apostolic age. They came here that they might<br />

have liberty to worship God according to the dictates <strong>of</strong> their own<br />

consciences, to establish a pure and simple form <strong>of</strong> worship for<br />

themselves and their posterity. They held that the conscience<br />

was free, that man was not responsible to his fellow man for his<br />

faith, but to God alone.<br />

These principles lie at the bottom <strong>of</strong> all that is tolerant in<br />

religion, liberal in politics, or worth contending for. The Pilgrims<br />

took another step in advance <strong>of</strong> the prevalent opinions <strong>of</strong><br />

their time. When about to embark from Leyden, their reverend<br />

pastor, in his farewell address, says : "I charge you before God<br />

and his blessed angels, that you follow me no further than you<br />

have seen me follow the Lord Jesus Christ. The Lord has more<br />

truth yet to break forth out <strong>of</strong> his holy word. I cannot suffi-<br />

ciently bewail the condition <strong>of</strong> the reformed churches, who are<br />

come to a period in religion, and will go at present no further than<br />

the instruments <strong>of</strong> their reformation, Luther and Calvin were

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!