Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

13.08.2013 Views

230 GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BARNSTABLE FAMILIES. In this manner the Indian described, in his dream, the twelve justices. He called no one by name ; but described some peculiar trait in the character of each, so that the individual intended was known. The pamphlet caused much excitement at the time, and was considered a tory document. The secret of the authorship was well kept ; no legal proof could be obtained respecting the author or the printer. It was a caustic satire on many who were afterwards leading whigs, and they never forgot it, or forgave the Crockers who were the reputed authors. Why this was so, it seems difficult to determine, for tories came in for their full share of the satire. If that pamphlet had emanated from a different source, I am inclined to the opinion that it would have been differently received. It was the allusions therein to the private characters of the individuals that gave offence. "The Body of the People" prevented the same justices from holding, by virtue of authority emanating from the King, their court in Barnstable. J The Committee arrested, or attempted to arrest, others who were satirized in the pamphlet. Private considerations probably had an influence in giving to Mr. Otis Loring so prominent a position m the Dream. He kept an opposition tavern, and had then recently enlarged his house, and was endeavoring to induce the Coui:t to stop with him. Mr. Loring was an outspoken and decided tory. He made no attempt to conceal his opinions. When the Vigilance Committee, of whom Col. Freeman was the Chairman, came to arrest him, he went into his blacksmith's shop and laid a long bar of iron across the fire, and heated the central portion to a read heat. His friends had given him notice of the approach of the Committee, and when they arrived he was prepared for them. He stood before his shop door holding the bar by either end. Without burning their fingers, it would have been diflScult for them to have made an immediate arrest. He politely said, "gentlemen, I am ready for you, come on." Finding him determined to resist, they went away, without maliing an arrest. At another time, Mr. Loring was concealed in a chamber of his house for several days, to avoid arrest. It does not appear that Mr. Loring or the Crockers had committed any overt or open act of treason. They had freely 1 1 read this pamphlet when a school hoy fifty years ago, and I cannot Touch for the verhal accuracy of the words placed in quotation marks. Henry Crocker, Esq., now of Boston, sat on the same bench with me, had the pamphlet, and I read it in the school room and have not since seen it. About the year 1824,1 had a conversation with Sarali La^vrence respecting it. She said, "the people said that my brother Josiah wrote it, that it was printed in Boston, brought from there in the packet, and the night following a copy was laid at the door of each man in the village." Her manner induced me to believe at tlie time, that there was truth in the common report, though she did not so state. JThe original papers on this subject have been preserved, and I intended to have printed them, with fac similes of the signatures ; but the publication must be deferred.

GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BARNSTABLE FAMILIES. 231 expressed their own opinions, usually in their own houses, and however obnoxious such opinions may have been to others, a sound policy did not demand the arrest or imprisonment of such men. Treason should be nipped in its bud ; but perfect freedom to debate on matters of policy is the unalienable right of a free people. The "Crocker Quarrels." Almost every evening, in these exciting times, the whigs met at their headquarters in the Sturgis tavern, to hear the news, and discuss current political events, and words often ran high. One evening a large company had assembled, Capt. Samuel Crocker, and his brothers Cornelius and Josiah were present, Col. Nathaniel Freeman of Sandwich, the late Capt. Samuel Taylor of Yarmouth, and others were present. The sub.iect of the conversation was politics. The principal speakers were Col. Freeman and Capt. Samuel Crocker. The latter was a whig, and one of the most efficient of the party in Barnstable, being frequently on Committees, and was a very able and intelligent man. He opposed the system of espionage which had been established, not only as useless, but as calculated to do injury to the cause of the country. Inquiring of the aged whether they had tea concealed in their houses, and of. young ladies whether they were whig or tory, he said was a duty not required of the patriot or the statesman. Others of the company opposed both Capt. Crocker and Col. Freeman. Words ran high. The Colonel was ardent and zealous—of a nervous temperament and opposition kindled his ii'e. Capt. Crocker, when excited, was earnest and irascible, and would not submit to be told that the moderate measures that he advocate^ was toryism in disguise. Crimination lead to re-crimination, and re-crimination to personal violence. Some of the company vented their spleen against the Crockers by breaking down the fence in front of the house. Opprobious epithets never make proselytes ; like the overcharged gun, they are apt to recoil. The violent political discussions of those days, prove no more this, that the convictions of the people were deep—that they were in earnest and that in their earnestness they sometimes over-stepped the bounds of prudence. If the difficulties between the Crockers and the Freemans had ended as they begun, only in the use of intemperate language, the remembrance of their dissentions would have long since been buried in oblivion. Not long afterwards the militia company paraded on the Court House Green. Cols. Nathaniel Freeman and Joseph Otis were both present. They were both unpopular with the soldiers.

230 GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BARNSTABLE FAMILIES.<br />

In this manner the Indian described, in his dream, the twelve<br />

justices. He called no one by name ; but described some peculiar<br />

trait in the character <strong>of</strong> each, so that the individual intended was<br />

known.<br />

The pamphlet caused much excitement at the time, and was<br />

considered a tory document. The secret <strong>of</strong> the authorship was<br />

well kept ; no legal pro<strong>of</strong> could be obtained respecting the author<br />

or the printer. It was a caustic satire on many who were afterwards<br />

leading whigs, and they never forgot it, or forgave the<br />

Crockers who were the reputed authors. Why this was so, it<br />

seems difficult to determine, for tories came in for their full share<br />

<strong>of</strong> the satire. If that pamphlet had emanated from a different<br />

source, I am inclined to the opinion that it would have been differently<br />

received. It was the allusions therein to the private characters<br />

<strong>of</strong> the individuals that gave <strong>of</strong>fence. "The Body <strong>of</strong> the<br />

People" prevented the same justices from holding, by virtue <strong>of</strong><br />

authority emanating from the King, their court in <strong>Barnstable</strong>. J<br />

The Committee arrested, or attempted to arrest, others who were<br />

satirized in the pamphlet. Private considerations probably had an<br />

influence in giving to Mr. Otis Loring so prominent a position m<br />

the Dream. He kept an opposition tavern, and had then recently<br />

enlarged his house, and was endeavoring to induce the Coui:t to<br />

stop with him.<br />

Mr. Loring was an outspoken and decided tory. He made<br />

no attempt to conceal his opinions. When the Vigilance Committee,<br />

<strong>of</strong> whom Col. Freeman was the Chairman, came to arrest<br />

him, he went into his blacksmith's shop and laid a long bar <strong>of</strong><br />

iron across the fire, and heated the central portion to a read heat.<br />

His friends had given him notice <strong>of</strong> the approach <strong>of</strong> the Committee,<br />

and when they arrived he was prepared for them. He<br />

stood before his shop door holding the bar by either end. Without<br />

burning their fingers, it would have been diflScult for them to<br />

have made an immediate arrest. He politely said, "gentlemen, I<br />

am ready for you, come on." Finding him determined to resist,<br />

they went away, without maliing an arrest. At another time, Mr.<br />

Loring was concealed in a chamber <strong>of</strong> his house for several days,<br />

to avoid arrest.<br />

It does not appear that Mr. Loring or the Crockers had<br />

committed any overt or open act <strong>of</strong> treason. They had freely<br />

1 1 read this pamphlet when a school hoy fifty years ago, and I cannot Touch for the<br />

verhal accuracy <strong>of</strong> the words placed in quotation marks. Henry Crocker, Esq., now <strong>of</strong><br />

Boston, sat on the same bench with me, had the pamphlet, and I read it in the school room<br />

and have not since seen it. About the year 1824,1 had a conversation with Sarali La^vrence<br />

respecting it. She said, "the people said that my brother Josiah wrote it, that it was<br />

printed in Boston, brought from there in the packet, and the night following a copy was<br />

laid at the door <strong>of</strong> each man in the village." Her manner induced me to believe at tlie<br />

time, that there was truth in the common report, though she did not so state.<br />

JThe original papers on this subject have been preserved, and I intended to have<br />

printed them, with fac similes <strong>of</strong> the signatures ; but the publication must be deferred.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!