Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

13.08.2013 Views

168 GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BARNSTABLE FAMILIES. vided for the personal safety, as well as the spiritual wants of the people. Deacon Cobb built his house on his lot, where the house formerly occupied by Josiah Lewis stands—a spot well selected for defence against Indian hostilities. Dea. Dimmock's stood a little east from the dwelling house of Isaac Davis, and 'Dea. Crocker's at West Barnstable. The two latter were remaining within the memory of persons now living. They were about twenty-iive feet square on the ground ; the lower story was of stone, the upper of wood. Elder Cobb died in 1679, having lived to a good old age, and was buried in the grave yard on Lothrop's Hill. No monument marks the spot where rest his mortal remains—no epitaph records his virtues. Deane says "he was a useful and valuable man," and there is beauty and truth in the words. He lived to be useful not to amass wealth or acquire political distinction. When a young man, he separated himself from the Church of England and joined the Puritans, then few in numbers, without influence, poor, despised and persecuted by the civil and ecclesias- tical powers. It appears that he joined Mr. Lothrop's church in London, the members whereof were tolerant in their views, independent and fearless in advocating the cause of religious liberty and the rights of conscience, and bold in their denunciations of all human creeds. He did not escape persecution, but he fortunately escaped being fconfined for two long years with Mr. Lothrop and twenty-four members of his church in the foul and loathsome prisons of London. He came to this country to secure religious liberty and the freedom of conscience—utterly detesting all human creeds, and firmly believing that the life is the best evidence of christian faith. He remained in Plymouth a few years, joined in church fellowship with the followers of Robinson, and listened to the teaching of the mild and venerable Brewster. In 1633, he went to Scituate, then a new settlement, and assisted in clearing the forests and building up a town. The next year his pastor Mr. Lothrop came over and settled in that town, and soon after, many of his ancient friends and brethren were his townsmen. After the organization of the church, they invested him with the office of senior deacon, a mark of their confidence in his ability and of their esteem for him as a man and a christian. In Barnstable he was active and useful in promoting the temporal, and in ministering to the spiritual wants of the first settlers. He was a town officer, a member of the most important town committees, and in 1645, 1647, 1652, 1659, 1660 and 1661, a deputy to the Colony Court. On the 14th of April, 1670, he was chosen and ordained a ruling elder of the Barnstable church, an office which he held till his death in 1679. Elder Cobb was not a man of brilliant talents. He was a

GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BARNSTABLE FAMILIES. 169 useful man, and an exemplary Christian. With perhaps one exception his life was a living illustration of his political and religious opinions. When in 1657, mainly through the influence of men in the Massachusetts Colony, a spirit of intolerance spread through the Plymouth Colony, and laws were enacted that an enlightened common sense condemns, and which were in violation of the principles of religious liberty which the fathers had held sacred. Elder Cobb was one of the deputies to the G-eneral Court, and there is no evidence to show that he did not approve of their enactment. In so doing he violated principles which he had long cherished and held sacred. It would have been better for his reputation had he like his friends Smith, Cudworth and Robinson and nearly all of the "first comers" then living, protested against these intolerant measures, and like them retired to private life with clear consciences and an unspotted reputation. Four years were sufficient to sweep away every vestige of the fanatical Colony. and intolerant spirit which How could it be otherwise ? had spread How could ovef the Old men who had themselves suffered persecution, imprisonment and stripes for conscience sake, and who had through life stoutly maintained that God alone was the judge of men's consciences, how could they, when the excitement had passed away, believe it right to persecute Baptists and Quakers and wrong to persecute Puritans. The absurdity of such a course forced itself upon the minds of such men as Elder Cobb, and soon wrought a complete change in public opinion. Three of the name of Cobb came to New England, and if John of Plymouth and John of Taunton are not the same, four. The Cobbs of Georgia are a different family, though perhaps remotely related. Thomas R. R. Cobb a brother of the rebel general Howell Cobb in a letter dated at Athens, Geo., April 7, 1857, says, "I have but little information as to my remote ancestry. The tradition as I have received it from my father, is that seven brothers originally emigrated from England. Four settled in Vh'ginia, three went to Massachusetts. Their names or subsequent history I never learned. I have heard my father say that his grandfather would frequently relate that the brother from whom he was descended, bought his wife from an emigrant ship for 700 lbs. of tobacco. My father, grandfather and greatgrandfather were all named John." Traditions are usually worthless. Three of the name came to Massachusetts, as stated in the letter ; but there is no evidence that they were brothers. The presumption is they were not. Mr. Pratt in his history of Eastham, page 27, gives an account of the origin of the Cobb families founded on a tratition which is wholly unreliable. He says four of the name, sons of Sylvanus, came over, namely, Jonathan from Harwich, England, settled in

GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BARNSTABLE FAMILIES. 169<br />

useful man, and an exemplary Christian. With perhaps one<br />

exception his life was a living illustration <strong>of</strong> his political and<br />

religious opinions. When in 1657, mainly through the influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> men in the Massachusetts Colony, a spirit <strong>of</strong> intolerance spread<br />

through the Plymouth Colony, and laws were enacted that an<br />

enlightened common sense condemns, and which were in violation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the principles <strong>of</strong> religious liberty which the fathers had held<br />

sacred. Elder Cobb was one <strong>of</strong> the deputies to the G-eneral<br />

Court, and there is no evidence to show that he did not approve<br />

<strong>of</strong> their enactment. In so doing he violated principles which he<br />

had long cherished and held sacred. It would have been better<br />

for his reputation had he like his friends Smith, Cudworth and<br />

Robinson and nearly all <strong>of</strong> the "first comers" then living, protested<br />

against these intolerant measures, and like them retired to<br />

private life with clear consciences and an unspotted reputation.<br />

Four years were sufficient to sweep away every vestige <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fanatical<br />

Colony.<br />

and intolerant spirit which<br />

How could it be otherwise ?<br />

had spread<br />

How could<br />

ovef the Old<br />

men who had<br />

themselves suffered persecution, imprisonment and stripes for<br />

conscience sake, and who had through life stoutly maintained that<br />

God alone was the judge <strong>of</strong> men's consciences, how could they,<br />

when the excitement had passed away, believe it right to persecute<br />

Baptists and Quakers and wrong to persecute Puritans. The<br />

absurdity <strong>of</strong> such a course forced itself upon the minds <strong>of</strong> such<br />

men as Elder Cobb, and soon wrought a complete change in public<br />

opinion.<br />

Three <strong>of</strong> the name <strong>of</strong> Cobb came to New England, and if<br />

John <strong>of</strong> Plymouth and John <strong>of</strong> Taunton are not the same, four.<br />

The Cobbs <strong>of</strong> Georgia are a different family, though perhaps<br />

remotely related. Thomas R. R. Cobb a brother <strong>of</strong> the rebel<br />

general Howell Cobb in a letter dated at Athens, Geo., April 7,<br />

1857, says, "I have but little information as to my remote ancestry.<br />

The tradition as I have received it from my father, is that<br />

seven brothers originally emigrated from England. Four settled<br />

in Vh'ginia, three went to Massachusetts. Their names or subsequent<br />

history I never learned. I have heard my father say that<br />

his grandfather would frequently relate that the brother from<br />

whom he was descended, bought his wife from an emigrant ship<br />

for 700 lbs. <strong>of</strong> tobacco. My father, grandfather and greatgrandfather<br />

were all named John."<br />

Traditions are usually worthless. Three <strong>of</strong> the name came<br />

to Massachusetts, as stated in the letter ; but there is no evidence<br />

that they were brothers. The presumption is they were not.<br />

Mr. Pratt in his history <strong>of</strong> Eastham, page 27, gives an account <strong>of</strong><br />

the origin <strong>of</strong> the Cobb <strong>families</strong> founded on a tratition which is<br />

wholly unreliable. He says four <strong>of</strong> the name, sons <strong>of</strong> Sylvanus,<br />

came over, namely, Jonathan from Harwich, England, settled in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!