13.08.2013 Views

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

Genealogical notes of Barnstable families - citizen hylbom blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GENEALOGICAL NOTES OF BARNSTABLE FAMILIES. 157<br />

which is now owned by his descendants. The deed is dated Dec.<br />

10, 1672, and for the consideration <strong>of</strong> £16 Mr. Howland conveys<br />

to him one-half <strong>of</strong> his lands in <strong>Barnstable</strong>, containing forty-five<br />

acres <strong>of</strong> upland. The deed is in the hand writing <strong>of</strong> Gov. Thomas<br />

Hinckley, is on parchment, and is now in the possession <strong>of</strong> the<br />

family <strong>of</strong> Mr. Samuel Chipman <strong>of</strong> Sandwich. The lands sold<br />

were bounded, easterly, partly by the land <strong>of</strong> John Otis and partly<br />

by the land <strong>of</strong> William Crocker, northerly by the marsh, westerly<br />

by the other half <strong>of</strong> the lands not sold. The boundaries are particularly<br />

described, and the range between Howland and Chipman<br />

ran over a well or spring, giving each a privilege thereto. Mr.<br />

Howland names his northern orchard, showing that at that early<br />

date he had set out two. Elder Chipman owned lands at West<br />

<strong>Barnstable</strong> before 1672, for in the same deed he makes an exchange<br />

<strong>of</strong> meadow with his brother-in-law. After his second marriage<br />

in 1684 he removed to Sandwich. He was admitted an<br />

inhabitant <strong>of</strong> that town in 1679, but appears to have been in <strong>Barnstable</strong><br />

in 1682. His removal was deeply regretted by the people,<br />

and many efforts were unsuccessfully made to induce him to return<br />

to <strong>Barnstable</strong>. The church, though dissatisfied at his removal<br />

without their consent, agreed to pay him five or six pounds annually,<br />

if he would resume his <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> Elder, and the town voted<br />

to make him a liberal grant <strong>of</strong> meadow lands if he would return.<br />

These votes show that his services were appreciated by the members<br />

<strong>of</strong> the church, with which he had held communion nearly<br />

forty years, and that he was highly esteemed as a man and a<br />

christian by his fellow townsmen and neighbors.<br />

His connection with the <strong>Barnstable</strong> church was most happy.<br />

His wife Hope joined the chm'ch Aug. 7, 1650, and he joined<br />

Jan'y 30, 1652-3. "Henry Cobb and John Chipman were chosen<br />

and ordained to be ruling Elders <strong>of</strong> this same church, and- they<br />

were solemnly invested with <strong>of</strong>fice upon ye 14th day <strong>of</strong> April Anno<br />

Dom : 1670." [Church Records.<br />

It is probable that he was a deacon <strong>of</strong> the chm-ch before he<br />

was elected Elder. He survived Mr. Cobb many years, and was<br />

the last Ruling Elder <strong>of</strong> the chm-ch. Subsequently, attempts were<br />

made to revive the <strong>of</strong>fice. The question was frequently discussed<br />

at church meetings ; but a majority opposed another election.<br />

His talents and services in civil life were duly appreciated.<br />

In June, 1659, he and Isaac Robinson and John Smith <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barnstable</strong>,<br />

and John Cook <strong>of</strong> Plymouth, were appointed by the Plymouth<br />

Colony Court to attend the meetings <strong>of</strong> the Quakers "to endeavour<br />

to reduce them from the errors <strong>of</strong> their wayes."—The re-<br />

sult was that Robinson, whose name appears most prominent in<br />

these proceedings, recommended the repeal <strong>of</strong> the severe laws that<br />

had been enacted against that sect. Smith and Chipman did not<br />

incur the censure <strong>of</strong> the Court, thousfh there is no reason to doubt

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!