13.08.2013 Views

Family-histories and genealogies : containing a series of ...

Family-histories and genealogies : containing a series of ...

Family-histories and genealogies : containing a series of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(Sli^VfStUOltl<br />

count <strong>of</strong> generations shows that he must have been born about 1590, <strong>and</strong><br />

could not, therefore, well have been the father <strong>of</strong> a son born, as our<br />

Edward was, in 1607, but must have been <strong>of</strong> the same generation with<br />

our Edward, Matthew <strong>and</strong> Thomas.<br />

The George baptized at Solihull in 1548 doubtless came <strong>of</strong> some<br />

younger branch <strong>of</strong> the family, <strong>and</strong> (supposing him the father <strong>of</strong> our three<br />

brothers) probably lived in Kenilworth, whence his two elder sons<br />

emigrated to America in 1639, when he was, in all probability, already<br />

dead ;<br />

for, if alive in 1639, he would have reached the age <strong>of</strong> ninety-one<br />

years. At the birth <strong>of</strong> Thomas, not earlier than 162 1, he must have been<br />

about seventy-three years old.<br />

This identification seems so probable that, for the present, until it shall<br />

be refuted, we rest upon it ; <strong>and</strong><br />

we assume also, as probable, from circum-<br />

stances to be referred to presently, that he was <strong>of</strong> the " gentle " Solihull<br />

family. We are unable, however, to give the particular steps <strong>of</strong> descent<br />

<strong>of</strong> the George Greswold baptized in 1548, because the Parish- Register tells<br />

us nothing <strong>of</strong> his parentage. It is important to add that the Parish-<br />

Register <strong>of</strong> Kenilworth prior to 1630 was destroyed under Cromwell,<br />

<strong>and</strong> that the name <strong>of</strong> Griswold or Greswold does not occur in it after<br />

1651.<br />

As has been noticed, our Griswold family possessed l<strong>and</strong>s in fee in<br />

Engl<strong>and</strong>, both before <strong>and</strong> after the emigration <strong>of</strong> Edward <strong>and</strong> Matthew.<br />

We can only wonder at the enterprise, courage <strong>and</strong> energy <strong>of</strong> these early<br />

pioneers. Matthew Griswold, at the early age <strong>of</strong> nineteen years, came<br />

with his brother Edward to Windsor, among its earliest settlers ; then<br />

struck out from there to find a new home in Saybrook ;<br />

then, as if that<br />

spot had become too narrow, crossed the "Great River," <strong>and</strong> made his<br />

final settlement as the first man who took up l<strong>and</strong> in Lyme. Perhaps this<br />

may have been partly due to the English passion for l<strong>and</strong>ed possessions<br />

also, perhaps, to a hereditary longing which could be fully gratified only<br />

by first occupation.<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!