13.08.2013 Views

Family-histories and genealogies : containing a series of ...

Family-histories and genealogies : containing a series of ...

Family-histories and genealogies : containing a series of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

^tfstiioltr<br />

Smith has received every attention, but cannot, in my judgment, change the opinion<br />

already formed. The war which has commenced, <strong>and</strong> the cruising <strong>of</strong> a hostile fleet<br />

on our coast, is not invasion, <strong>and</strong> the declaration <strong>of</strong> the President, that there is imminent<br />

danger <strong>of</strong> invasion, is evidently a consequence drawn from the facts now<br />

disclosed, <strong>and</strong>, I am compelled to say, is not, in my opinion, warranted by those facts.<br />

If such consequence were admitted to result from a state <strong>of</strong> war, <strong>and</strong> from the facts<br />

now mentioned, <strong>and</strong> which always must attend a war with an European power, it<br />

would follow that every war <strong>of</strong> that character would throw the militia into the h<strong>and</strong>s<br />

<strong>of</strong> the National Gov'nt, <strong>and</strong> strip the States <strong>of</strong> the important right reserved to them.<br />

But it is proper for me further to observe that I have found difficulty in fixing in my<br />

own mind the meaning <strong>of</strong> the words imminent danger <strong>of</strong> invasion, used by Congress in<br />

the Act <strong>of</strong> the 28''' <strong>of</strong> Feb'' 1805, <strong>and</strong> now repeated in your letter, as no such expression<br />

is contained in that part <strong>of</strong> the Constitution which authorizes the President to call<br />

the militia into service. Presuming, however, that some definite meaning, thought<br />

consistent with the Constitution, was at the time annexed to the expression, I have<br />

rather inferred that the Legislature must have intended only to include an extreme<br />

case, when an enemy had not passed the line <strong>of</strong> the State, but was evidently advancing<br />

in force to invade our country. Such a case would undoubtedly come within the<br />

spirit <strong>of</strong> the Constitution, although it might not be included in its literal expression.<br />

But whether the Congress <strong>of</strong> 1805 was justified in the expression, or not, is unimpor-<br />

tant, there being no difficulty in the present case, as none <strong>of</strong> the facts disclosed permit<br />

anything more than slight <strong>and</strong> remote danger <strong>of</strong> invasion, which the Constitution<br />

could not contemplate, <strong>and</strong> which might exist even in time <strong>of</strong> peace.<br />

" Whilst I regret this difference <strong>of</strong> opinion, upon a question <strong>of</strong> serious impor-<br />

tance, I cannot doubt that the President will perceive that a sense <strong>of</strong> duty leaves no<br />

other course to pursue, <strong>and</strong> that the general government will speedily provide the<br />

troops deemed necessary for the defence <strong>of</strong> the coast <strong>of</strong> this State.<br />

"Dear Sir,<br />

" I have the honour to be, &c."<br />

"Cambridge, 3 Sept. 1812.<br />

" It is with great concern that we find your health so much impaired, espe-<br />

cially at this perilous crisis. We do hope, however, that your long journey <strong>and</strong> the<br />

mineral waters, with the blessing <strong>of</strong> Heaven, will restore it. Could your Excellency<br />

visit Boston during the autumn, would not the journey be salutary to yourself <strong>and</strong> to<br />

our sickly Commonwealth ? I am sure it would give the highest pleasure to our<br />

103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!