Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ...

Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ... Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ...

13.08.2013 Views

SECOND GENERATION (4) NICHOLAS OLMSTED, b. in England; bap. at Fairsted, Eng., Feb. 15, 1612; d. Aug. 31, 1684; m. (1) Sept. 28, 1640, Sarah Loomis, of Windsor, Conn.; b. 1617; dau. of Joseph and Mary (White) Loomis; d. 1667; (2) Mrs. Mary Lord, of Wethersfield, Conn., widow of Dr. Thomas Lord. 8, Sarah; b. at Hartford, Conn., 1641; d. Nov. 7, 1709; m. 1661-2, George Gates, of Hartford and E. Haddam, Conn.; d. Nov. 12, 1724. He was an original proprietor of Haddam. Removed about 1658 to the east side of the river. 9, Maky; b. Nov. 20, 1646; d. 1646. 10, Rebecca; b. Mar. 12, 1647-8; m. John Bigelow; b. Oct. 27, 1643; d. prob. 1721; son of John and Mary (Warren) Bigelow, of Watertown, Mass. He settled in Hartford, where his land was listed May 3, 1669. His residence was in Cooper Lane, now La Fayette St. 11, John; bap. Feb. 3, 1649-50; d. young. 12, Samuel +. 13, Joseph +. 14, Thomas +. 15, Mabel +. 16, Elizabeth +. Nicholas Olmsted came to Boston and to Hartford with his father and the family. Soon after the settlement of Hartford, it was evident that the Indians were " jealous and seemed determined upon the destruction of the infant town, and it became a question, either to abandon the country, or conquer the foe. " On the first of May, 1637, just eighteen months after the settlement was begun, and when there were only eight hundred souls in the Colony, the Court met and resolved upon an offensive war against the Pequots. On the 9th of May ninety men were drafted and ready for the expedition. " They embarked in three little floats that were to convey them down the river, and on the 15th were at the mouth of the river, whence 20 men were sent back to guard their own defenceless homes. On the morning of May 28th the little army, consisting of seventy-seven Englishmen and a party of Narragansett and Mohegan Indians, was before the fort of the Pequots at Mystic. Then began the ' direfxil fight ' in which, in one hour, 600 Indians were slain and their power broken forever. " In three days the little army was at home again with a loss of two killed and twenty wounded. The Colony had peace for nearly forty years, when King Philip's war began." Nicholas served in the Pequot war, under Capt. Mason, and is mentioned by him in his account of the burning of the Indian fort: " Lieutenant Thomas Bull and Nicholas Olmsted beholding, came up; and when it was thoroughly kindled, the Indians ran about as most dreadfully Amazed."—Bodge's Soldiers in King Philip's War, etc., p. 13. Both Nicholas and Richard Olmsted, his cousin, " received grants of land for services in the Pequot War." Id., p. 466. Nicholas Olmsted was appointed by the General Court, with Thomas Bull and Robert Webster, a committee to view and settle Mattatuck, now Waterbury, and on April 6, 1674, made a favorable report. "The Court appointed Ensign Samuel Steel, Ensign John Wadsworth and Lieut. Nicholas Olmsted a committee to regulate the settling of a plan-

— Second Generation 13 tation at Mattatuck. This committee was composed of men of note, who bore honorable names, well known in the history of the Colony, and attest the high consideration with which they were regarded. Lieut. Nicholas Olmsted was a deputy in 1672, and in active service as a Lieut, in King Philip's war."—History of Waterbury, Conn. (Bronson), pp. 7-8. Nicholas Olmsted was chosen surveyor of highways in 1646; Townsman for the North side 9 years, between 1653 and 1683; Corporal in the Hartford Troop of Horse, 1658; freeman and list and rate maker, 1669; deputy to the General Court in 1672 and 1673. Aug. 14, 1673, on a great appearance of danger from the Dutch, troops were raised in the Colony, 160 from Hartford County, and Nicholas Olmsted was appointed Lieut. King Philip's war began June 20, 1675. In July, 1675, he was sent in command of the troops to New London and Huntington on the occasion of an Indian alarm. On August 26, 1675, he was made a Captain of the troop. The following letters, taken from the Winthrop Papers, are of interest in this connection: 1st. From John Winthrop, Jr., to Fitz John Winthrop " Hartford, July 9th, 1675. "Remember me to Leift. Omsted and let him know that his Wife and all friends are well." — 2d. From Nicholas Olmsted to Wait Winthrop " Dated, Petequomseut att Mr. Bulls. July the 10th, '75. " These for the honnored Captayne Mr. Waite Winthrop, Commander in chife of his Maiesty's forces of Conetecoote present. " Sir, After my seruice presented to your selfe these are enform you that ther is yet hopes of a compliance with the Indians, if they be tenderly dealte withall; for. heare was yesterday seuerall to speak with Mr. Bull, if he had binn att home, ther was one came for that purpose as he sayd; and much desired to speak with your selfe, and promised to bring either Suckquame this day or some other of his chife men to speak with your selfe. It is desired that you would make what convienient speed you can, because night will grow on, and tomorrow is the Saboth, and you will be put by of the opertunytye. " Not else but remayne, " Your bubble servant to my peuer, " NiCHo. Olmsted." Mr. Bulls' house was in South Kingston, R. I. 3d. From John Winthrop, Jr., to Fitz John Winthrop " Hartford, July 12th, 1675. ' "I am hasted and not willing to delay the post, and shall only add the remembrance of my love, and your sisters and to Mr. & Mrs. Smith, and Mr. Bull and Capt. Hutchenson, Leift. Omsted and all freinds as occasion, and ^^^^- " Your loving Father, " J. Winthrop." " Let Leift; know yt Mrs. Omsted and all his are well, and all at Capt. Bulls." 4th. From John AUyn to Fitz John Winthrop " Dated. Hartford, Sept. 20, 1675. " Majo. Treat was just marching as the alarm reached Hadly. He presently sent over the river. Cptn. Olmsted wth about 60 men to keep them from passing

SECOND GENERATION<br />

(4) NICHOLAS OLMSTED, b. <strong>in</strong> England; bap. at Fairsted, Eng., Feb.<br />

15, 1612; d. Aug. 31, 1684; m. (1) Sept. 28, 1640, Sarah Loomis, <strong>of</strong> W<strong>in</strong>dsor,<br />

Conn.; b. 1617; dau. <strong>of</strong> Joseph and Mary (White) Loomis; d. 1667; (2) Mrs.<br />

Mary Lord, <strong>of</strong> We<strong>the</strong>rsfield, Conn., widow <strong>of</strong> Dr. Thomas Lord.<br />

8, Sarah; b. at Hartford, Conn., 1641; d. Nov. 7, 1709; m. 1661-2, George<br />

Gates, <strong>of</strong> Hartford and E. Haddam, Conn.; d. Nov. 12, 1724. He was<br />

an orig<strong>in</strong>al proprietor <strong>of</strong> Haddam. Removed about 1658 to <strong>the</strong> east side<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> river. 9, Maky; b. Nov. 20, 1646; d. 1646. 10, Rebecca; b. Mar.<br />

12, 1647-8; m. John Bigelow; b. Oct. 27, 1643; d. prob. 1721; son <strong>of</strong> John<br />

and Mary (Warren) Bigelow, <strong>of</strong> Watertown, Mass. He settled <strong>in</strong> Hartford,<br />

where his land was listed May 3, 1669. His residence was <strong>in</strong> Cooper<br />

Lane, now La Fayette St. 11, John; bap. Feb. 3, 1649-50; d. young.<br />

12, Samuel +. 13, Joseph +. 14, Thomas +. 15, Mabel +. 16,<br />

Elizabeth +.<br />

Nicholas <strong>Olmsted</strong> came to Boston and to Hartford with his fa<strong>the</strong>r and<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>family</strong>. Soon after <strong>the</strong> settlement <strong>of</strong> Hartford, it was evident that <strong>the</strong><br />

Indians were " jealous and seemed determ<strong>in</strong>ed upon <strong>the</strong> destruction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>fant town, and it became a question, ei<strong>the</strong>r to abandon <strong>the</strong> country, or<br />

conquer <strong>the</strong> foe.<br />

" On <strong>the</strong> first <strong>of</strong> May, 1637, just eighteen months after <strong>the</strong> settlement<br />

was begun, and when <strong>the</strong>re were only eight hundred souls <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Colony,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Court met and resolved upon an <strong>of</strong>fensive war aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> Pequots. On<br />

<strong>the</strong> 9th <strong>of</strong> May n<strong>in</strong>ety men were drafted and ready for <strong>the</strong> expedition.<br />

" They embarked <strong>in</strong> three little floats that were to convey <strong>the</strong>m down<br />

<strong>the</strong> river, and on <strong>the</strong> 15th were at <strong>the</strong> mouth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> river, whence 20 men<br />

were sent back to guard <strong>the</strong>ir own defenceless homes. On <strong>the</strong> morn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> May<br />

28th <strong>the</strong> little army, consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> seventy-seven Englishmen and a party<br />

<strong>of</strong> Narragansett and Mohegan Indians, was before <strong>the</strong> fort <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pequots<br />

at Mystic. Then began <strong>the</strong> ' direfxil fight ' <strong>in</strong> which, <strong>in</strong> one hour, 600 Indians<br />

were sla<strong>in</strong> and <strong>the</strong>ir power broken forever.<br />

" In three days <strong>the</strong> little army was at home aga<strong>in</strong> with a loss <strong>of</strong> two<br />

killed and twenty wounded. The Colony had peace for nearly forty years,<br />

when K<strong>in</strong>g Philip's war began."<br />

Nicholas served <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pequot war, under Capt. Mason, and is mentioned<br />

by him <strong>in</strong> his account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> burn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Indian fort: " Lieutenant Thomas<br />

Bull and Nicholas <strong>Olmsted</strong> behold<strong>in</strong>g, came up; and when it was thoroughly<br />

k<strong>in</strong>dled, <strong>the</strong> Indians ran about as most dreadfully Amazed."—Bodge's Soldiers<br />

<strong>in</strong> K<strong>in</strong>g Philip's War, etc., p. 13. Both Nicholas and Richard <strong>Olmsted</strong>, his<br />

cous<strong>in</strong>, " received grants <strong>of</strong> land for services <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pequot War." Id., p.<br />

466.<br />

Nicholas <strong>Olmsted</strong> was appo<strong>in</strong>ted by <strong>the</strong> General Court, with Thomas<br />

Bull and Robert Webster, a committee to view and settle Mattatuck, now<br />

Waterbury, and on April 6, 1674, made a favorable report.<br />

"The Court appo<strong>in</strong>ted Ensign Samuel Steel, Ensign John Wadsworth<br />

and Lieut. Nicholas <strong>Olmsted</strong> a committee to regulate <strong>the</strong> settl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a plan-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!