Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ...

Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ... Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ...

13.08.2013 Views

CAPT. JABEZ OLMSTED, OF WARE, MASS. (Introduction by Frederick S. Hammond, Esq., of Syracuse, N. Y., Compiler of the Hammond Genealogy) The ancestry of Jabez Olmsted, who was born about 1690, is one of the unsolved genealogical problems. It seems strange that the parentage of a man of so much importance in the locality in which he lived cannot be established with some degree of certainty, but we must bear in mind the fact that the emigrant ancestry of a very large percentage of the families who came between 1630 and 1700 is either unknown or established by unsatisfactory circumstantial evidence. We have our " Farmer " and our "Savage " and our " Hotten's Lists " of emigrants but still we know that many thousands landed upon our shores of whom we have no record whatever. The writer has found many circumstances in his own genealogical work to prove this fact conclusively. It has also been asserted on good authority that many came under assumed, names to escape religious persecution and for various other reasons. There are indications of other Olmsteds in this country at an early date, not of the families of James and Richard Olmsted although possibly closely connected with their families. It seems probable that Jabez Olmsted belongs to one of these closely connected families. In the early Court records of Preston and Norwich, Conn., we find references to a Mrs. Joanna Rose, widow of Anthony Rose, who married second a man named Fleming and for her third husband an Olmsted whose given name does not appear. In 1688 she was living as Mrs. Joanna Olmsted, in Norwich, Conn. There does not appear to have been any known member of the James or Richard Olmsted lines who could have been her husband. Dr. John Olmsted had but recently deceased in Norwich, leaving a widow, Elizabeth (Marvin) Olmsted, and it seems probable that her husband was more or less distantly related to Dr. John Olmsted. It is possible that a solution of this problem might reveal the parentage of Jabez. Sheldon's "History of Deerfield" mentions just two of the name: Jabez, a soldier in the Indian wars in 1709, and William Olmsted, a Conn, soldier who, with one Benton, was killed by the Indians July 31, 1704. This William may have been the father of Jabez. The late Dr. Henry K. Olmsted supposed this William to have been a son of Nehemiah and Elizabeth (Burr) Olmsted, but a thorough search of the records at Fairfield, Conn., shows that the said Nehemiah who died in 1657 left an only child, a daughter, Sarah. The final settlement of his estate a year later shows a division between the widow and this child, precluding the possibility of any posthumous child. Genealogists who have undertaken to solve this problem have evolved various visionary theories which when followed out to their supposed foundations have been found to be absolutely without any foundation in fact. Hyde, in his anniversary address at Ware, Mass., made prominent a tradition that Jabez Olmsted had Indian blood in his veins. This is so utterly improbable as to be scarcely worth the mention. If true he must have been a half breed or at least a quarter breed Indian and no one of mixed blood would have held a commission in the British service. There were Indians and half breeds in the ranks and as scouts but none amongst the officers. Furthermore a part blood Indian would never have married into a family like the family of Thomas Barnes. Some other genealogist advanced the 390

Olmsted Family Genealogy 391 theory, which gained some credence, that Jabez was the child of Martha (Bigelow) Olmsted, the discarded wife of Thomas Olmsted, of Hartford, who married Obadiah Wood and reared a fine family of children. This child was born in 1686. The sex of the child is unknown; there is no evidence whatever that it lived to grow up. This child was born in wedlock and probably would have held the Olmsted name even though the mother was divorced, but a thorough search of wills, administrations, deeds, etc., in both the Olmsted and Wood families does not show any evidence of the child or any evidence of any Jabez Olmsted and the same is true of the Court records. Jabez and Thankful (Barnes) Olmsted named a daughter Martha but Thankful had a sister Martha Barnes who married Thomas Gilbert. She also named a daughter Prudence after her sister Prudence. The only other fact that could be construed by any stretch of fancy into circumstantial evidence of such a connection, is the record of the sale of a tract of land in Ware, Mass., June 27, 1733, by Jabez Olmsted to Obadiah Wood of Hartford, presumably the son of Obadiah and Martha (Bigelow- Olmsted) Wood but the deed was given for a liberal consideration and nothing contained therein implies any relationship, so we dismiss this theory as not worthy of serious consideration. In our branch of the family is found a tradition of Rhode Island ancestry but the Olmsted name has not been discovered amongst the early settlers of Rhode Island. Emery Olmsted, son of Timothy, was living at an advanced age in Greensboro, Vt., in 1873. He gave us the tradition that Jabez was the son of " Moses" Olmsted who was an emigrant to Hartford before 1700. No evidence of such a man has been found. Traditions are unreliable but they usually have a considerable foundation in fact, even though the details are not strictly accurate and it may be that the father of Jabez was an emigrant even though his name may not have been Moses. Jabez named a son Moses, however, and the name has come down to us through that branch of the family. It is quite possible that Jabez himself may have been the emigrant from England not long before his appearance in Deerfield, Mass., in 1709. The almost complete difference in given names in the early generations of this family and the families of James and Richard may be taken as an indication of different ancestry. Jabez, Israel and Jedediah are confined exclusively to this line and Jeremiah appears very rarely in the other lines at a much later date. Joseph is common to all the Olmsted families, while Timothy and Simeon appear at about the same period in the Jabez and James lines. A very probable ancestry for Capt. Jabez Olmsted is found in "Waters Genealogical Gleanings in England," published in the N. E. Hist.-Gen. Register, Vol. 41, p. 173. " Will of John Hawes, the elder, of St. Lawrence, in the County of Essex, yoeman, dated Aug. 7, 1613, proved Oct. 12, 1613. Son, John and Elizabeth, his daughter; kinsman John Anthony; Charles Anthony the younger, a sister's son; Martha Anthony, youngest daughter of said sister; Frances, the eldest daughter of sister Alice Anthony; John Olmsted, son of Richard Olmsted and daughter Elizabeth; Israel Olmsted, their second son; Jedediah Olmsted, their third son, and Ehzabeth Olmsted, their daughter; daughter, EUzabeth, wife of Richard Olmsted, clerk; wife, Elizabeth Hawes."—(From Commissary Court, Essex, Herts, 1613.). This Rev. Richard Olmsted who married Elizabeth Hawes, daughter of John Hawes and Elizabeth Gold, was at one time Rector of Arwarton County,

<strong>Olmsted</strong> Family <strong>Genealogy</strong> 391<br />

<strong>the</strong>ory, which ga<strong>in</strong>ed some credence, that Jabez was <strong>the</strong> child <strong>of</strong> Martha<br />

(Bigelow) <strong>Olmsted</strong>, <strong>the</strong> discarded wife <strong>of</strong> Thomas <strong>Olmsted</strong>, <strong>of</strong> Hartford,<br />

who married Obadiah Wood and reared a f<strong>in</strong>e <strong>family</strong> <strong>of</strong> children. This child<br />

was born <strong>in</strong> 1686. The sex <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> child is unknown; <strong>the</strong>re is no evidence whatever<br />

that it lived to grow up. This child was born <strong>in</strong> wedlock and probably<br />

would have held <strong>the</strong> <strong>Olmsted</strong> name even though <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r was divorced,<br />

but a thorough search <strong>of</strong> wills, adm<strong>in</strong>istrations, deeds, etc., <strong>in</strong> both <strong>the</strong> <strong>Olmsted</strong><br />

and Wood families does not show any evidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> child or any evidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> any Jabez <strong>Olmsted</strong> and <strong>the</strong> same is true <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Court records.<br />

Jabez and Thankful (Barnes) <strong>Olmsted</strong> named a daughter Martha but<br />

Thankful had a sister Martha Barnes who married Thomas Gilbert. She<br />

also named a daughter Prudence after her sister Prudence.<br />

The only o<strong>the</strong>r fact that could be construed by any stretch <strong>of</strong> fancy <strong>in</strong>to<br />

circumstantial evidence <strong>of</strong> such a connection, is <strong>the</strong> record <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sale <strong>of</strong> a<br />

tract <strong>of</strong> land <strong>in</strong> Ware, Mass., June 27, 1733, by Jabez <strong>Olmsted</strong> to Obadiah<br />

Wood <strong>of</strong> Hartford, presumably <strong>the</strong> son <strong>of</strong> Obadiah and Martha (Bigelow-<br />

<strong>Olmsted</strong>) Wood but <strong>the</strong> deed was given for a liberal consideration and noth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong>re<strong>in</strong> implies any relationship, so we dismiss this <strong>the</strong>ory as not<br />

worthy <strong>of</strong> serious consideration.<br />

In our branch <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>family</strong> is found a tradition <strong>of</strong> Rhode Island ancestry<br />

but <strong>the</strong> <strong>Olmsted</strong> name has not been discovered amongst <strong>the</strong> early settlers<br />

<strong>of</strong> Rhode Island. Emery <strong>Olmsted</strong>, son <strong>of</strong> Timothy, was liv<strong>in</strong>g at an advanced<br />

age <strong>in</strong> Greensboro, Vt., <strong>in</strong> 1873.<br />

He gave us <strong>the</strong> tradition that Jabez was <strong>the</strong> son <strong>of</strong> " Moses" <strong>Olmsted</strong> who<br />

was an emigrant to Hartford before 1700. No evidence <strong>of</strong> such a man has<br />

been found. Traditions are unreliable but <strong>the</strong>y usually have a considerable<br />

foundation <strong>in</strong> fact, even though <strong>the</strong> details are not strictly accurate and it<br />

may be that <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> Jabez was an emigrant even though his name may<br />

not have been Moses. Jabez named a son Moses, however, and <strong>the</strong> name has<br />

come down to us through that branch <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>family</strong>. It is quite possible<br />

that Jabez himself may have been <strong>the</strong> emigrant from England not long before<br />

his appearance <strong>in</strong> Deerfield, Mass., <strong>in</strong> 1709. The almost complete difference<br />

<strong>in</strong> given names <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early generations <strong>of</strong> this <strong>family</strong> and <strong>the</strong> families <strong>of</strong><br />

James and Richard may be taken as an <strong>in</strong>dication <strong>of</strong> different ancestry. Jabez,<br />

Israel and Jedediah are conf<strong>in</strong>ed exclusively to this l<strong>in</strong>e and Jeremiah appears<br />

very rarely <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r l<strong>in</strong>es at a much later date. Joseph is common to all<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Olmsted</strong> families, while Timothy and Simeon appear at about <strong>the</strong> same<br />

period <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jabez and James l<strong>in</strong>es. A very probable ancestry for Capt.<br />

Jabez <strong>Olmsted</strong> is found <strong>in</strong> "Waters Genealogical Glean<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> England,"<br />

published <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> N. E. Hist.-Gen. Register, Vol. 41, p. 173.<br />

" Will <strong>of</strong> John Hawes, <strong>the</strong> elder, <strong>of</strong> St. Lawrence, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> County <strong>of</strong> Essex,<br />

yoeman, dated Aug. 7, 1613, proved Oct. 12, 1613. Son, John and Elizabeth,<br />

his daughter; k<strong>in</strong>sman John Anthony; Charles Anthony <strong>the</strong> younger, a sister's<br />

son; Martha Anthony, youngest daughter <strong>of</strong> said sister; Frances, <strong>the</strong><br />

eldest daughter <strong>of</strong> sister Alice Anthony; John <strong>Olmsted</strong>, son <strong>of</strong> Richard <strong>Olmsted</strong><br />

and daughter Elizabeth; Israel <strong>Olmsted</strong>, <strong>the</strong>ir second son; Jedediah<br />

<strong>Olmsted</strong>, <strong>the</strong>ir third son, and Ehzabeth <strong>Olmsted</strong>, <strong>the</strong>ir daughter; daughter,<br />

EUzabeth, wife <strong>of</strong> Richard <strong>Olmsted</strong>, clerk; wife, Elizabeth Hawes."—(From<br />

Commissary Court, Essex, Herts, 1613.).<br />

This Rev. Richard <strong>Olmsted</strong> who married Elizabeth Hawes, daughter <strong>of</strong><br />

John Hawes and Elizabeth Gold, was at one time Rector <strong>of</strong> Arwarton County,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!