Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ...

Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ... Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ...

13.08.2013 Views

xvi Olmsted Family Genealogy fondness for adventure, it is safe to surmise that some of our ancestors, at least, rallied under the de Vere star round the banners of the red rose. These were troublous times in England, but the private fortunes of the Olmsteds were not entirely undermined by the affairs of state, for m 1565 we find one, John Olmsted of Bumpsted-Helion, purchasing the manors of Horsdens, Caxton and Pentlow, formerly the property of Edward, Lord Wmdsor by right of his wife, Catherine, daughter of John de Vere. And in 1576 we find this same John Olmsted, Master of the Horse to the Earl of Oxford at Castle Hedingham, making another purchase of considerable importance, that of the site and mansion house of Stansted Hall. This John Olmsted, called the " Spendthrift," was not one of our lineal ancestors, as he left only daughters, but he was one of the blood, and his traits are not as yet extinct, I understand. As to our direct ancestors, we have been able, by the aid of the church records of Fairsted and of Great Leighs, to trace descent, with a reasonable degree of accuracy, from one, Richard Olmsted, born about 1430, whose descendant James married Alice and had three sons, of whom James, Jr., born about 1550, by his wife Jane Bristow, was father of another James, the Colonist, and of Richard, the father of the three young emigrants who accompanied their Uncle James to New England, namely, Richard, John and Rebecca. The cause of the emigration of our Puritan forefathers from England to America is a matter of historical record, but it may not be amiss to recall the subject here. During the last half of the reign of Queen Elizabeth a great change had come oyer the people of England. As Green puts it, " England became the people of a book, and that book was the Bible." Even the love of pure letters of the Renaissance gave way to the love of this book. It was in everybody's home, and its influence upon the mind and conscience of the people was amazing. " A new conception of life and of man superseded the old." " Theology rules there," said Grotius, speaking of England .'shortly after Elizabeth's death. A certain gravity of demeanor disclosed itself even in the country gentlemen like our ancestors, whose diversions before this had been of the lighter sort, such as hawking, fencing and dancing. The brilliancy of dress of the Renaissance disappeared. A more sober vestment characterized the Puritans, and an increasing fondness for simplicity in all things, but especially in the forms of worship. Most of the Puritans were undesirous of separating themselves from the Church of England, but they attempted to "purify" it from within, and to simplify its ritual, which reminded them of popery. They refused to wear the surplice, to baptize with the sign of the cross, to bow at the name of Jesus, to make use of the ring in the marriage ceremony, and to acknowledge the divine authority of the episcopate. Elizabeth had tried in vain to force her people into an acceptance of the church administration that she prescribed, and had gone so far as to execute certain non-conformists. Then came James, the hope of the Puritans, but, although educated as a Presbyterian, upon his accession to the throne he "renounced the Calvinistic sympathies he had cherished in Scotland," and turned a deaf ear to the pleas of his Puritan subjects. It was about this time that the Separatist congregation at Scrooby succeeded in leaving England, and settled for a brief while in Holland, whither a portion set sail for the New World in the Mayflower, landing at Plymouth, Dec. 21, 1620.

Introduction xvii Meanwhile, the Puritans remaining in England had fallen upon bitter days, by the accession in 1625 of Charles I to the throne of his father. The new monarch's chief religious advisor was Wm. Laud, Bishop of London, and later Archbishop of Canterbury. This eminent but narrow-minded divine was a formalist by temperament and education. The crude simplicity of the reformed church was repugnant to him, and he determined to restore to the Church of England the pomp and ceremonial that he deemed was its rightful possession, as a branch of the great Catholic Church of the world. "Bowing to the altar was introduced into all cathedral churches." The communion table was given its pre-Reformation position in the chancel, instead of the position it had occupied for more than half a century in the middle of the nave. Most shocking of all to Puritan standards, diversions on the Sabbath day were not only encouraged by Laud and his supporters, but every English pastor was compelled by royal order to read from the pulpit a declaration in favor of Sunday pastimes. Refusal to comply with these and similar orders was met with fines, imprisonment, confiscation of property, and even execution. Such was the condition of affairs in 1630, when in the County of Essex, in the neighborhood of our Olmsted ancestors, the Reverend Mr. Thomas Hooker, a preacher of great ability and renown, was silenced for non-conformity. To escape imprisonment and worse, he fled to Holland. Indeed, it was well that he fled, for he might have met the fate of another non-conformist minister who was that same year "pilloried, whipped, branded, slit in the nos- trils, and deprived by successive mutUation of his ears." Up to this time emigration to America had been slow, and the colony in New England numbered only some few hundred souls, but now the Puritan exodus began upon ah unprecedented scale. Two hundred Puritans had recently embarked for Salem. These were soon followed by eight hundred more under John Winthrop. These in turn were followed by seven hundred more. In all, seventeen ships had beaten their way across the seas before the close of the year 1630. " Nor were these emigrants," as Green declares, "like the earlier colonists of the South, 'broken men,' adventurers, bankrupts, criminals; or simply poor men and artisans, like the Pilgrim Fathers of the Mayflower. They were in great part men of the professional and middle classes; some of them men of large landed estate." Of the latter class was the family of our honored relative, James Olmsted, who, together with two sons, Nicholas and Nehemiah, two nephews, Richard and John, and a niece, Rebecca, arrived in New England, on the Lord's Day, Sept. 16, 1632, in the ship Lyon, under Capt. Pierce, after a voyage of 12 weeks from Braintree, England. There were 123 passengers, of whom 50 were children. " They settled first at Mount Wallaston, now Quincy, near Boston, but in the course of the year, 'by order of the Court,' they removed to Newtown now Cambridge." " The recent settlers of Newtown," says Holmes, "had, while in England, attended the ministry of the Reverend Thomas Hooker, who, to escape fines and imprisonment for his non-conformity, had now fled into Holland." So, as Mather, another contemporary, remarks, " immediately after their settlement at Newtown, they expressed their earnest desires to Mr. Hooker that he would come over into New England and take the pastoral charge of them. At their desire he left Holland, and, having obtained Mr. Samuel Stone .... ,

xvi <strong>Olmsted</strong> Family <strong>Genealogy</strong><br />

fondness for adventure, it is safe to surmise that some <strong>of</strong> our ancestors, at<br />

least, rallied under <strong>the</strong> de Vere star round <strong>the</strong> banners <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> red rose.<br />

These were troublous times <strong>in</strong> England, but <strong>the</strong> private fortunes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Olmsted</strong>s were not entirely underm<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> affairs <strong>of</strong> state, for m 1565 we<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d one, John <strong>Olmsted</strong> <strong>of</strong> Bumpsted-Helion, purchas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> manors <strong>of</strong> Horsdens,<br />

Caxton and Pentlow, formerly <strong>the</strong> property <strong>of</strong> Edward, Lord Wmdsor by<br />

right <strong>of</strong> his wife, Ca<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>e, daughter <strong>of</strong> John de Vere. And <strong>in</strong> 1576 we f<strong>in</strong>d<br />

this same John <strong>Olmsted</strong>, Master <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Horse to <strong>the</strong> Earl <strong>of</strong> Oxford at Castle<br />

Hed<strong>in</strong>gham, mak<strong>in</strong>g ano<strong>the</strong>r purchase <strong>of</strong> considerable importance, that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

site and mansion house <strong>of</strong> Stansted Hall. This John <strong>Olmsted</strong>, called <strong>the</strong><br />

" Spendthrift," was not one <strong>of</strong> our l<strong>in</strong>eal ancestors, as he left only daughters,<br />

but he was one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> blood, and his traits are not as yet ext<strong>in</strong>ct, I understand.<br />

As to our direct ancestors, we have been able, by <strong>the</strong> aid <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> church<br />

records <strong>of</strong> Fairsted and <strong>of</strong> Great Leighs, to trace descent, with a reasonable<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> accuracy, from one, Richard <strong>Olmsted</strong>, born about 1430, whose descendant<br />

James married Alice and had three sons, <strong>of</strong> whom James, Jr., born<br />

about 1550, by his wife Jane Bristow, was fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r James, <strong>the</strong> Colonist,<br />

and <strong>of</strong> Richard, <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> three young emigrants who accompanied<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir Uncle James to New England, namely, Richard, John and Rebecca.<br />

The cause <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> emigration <strong>of</strong> our Puritan forefa<strong>the</strong>rs from England to<br />

<strong>America</strong> is a matter <strong>of</strong> historical record, but it may not be amiss to recall <strong>the</strong><br />

subject here.<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> last half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reign <strong>of</strong> Queen Elizabeth a great change had<br />

come oyer <strong>the</strong> people <strong>of</strong> England. As Green puts it, " England became <strong>the</strong><br />

people <strong>of</strong> a book, and that book was <strong>the</strong> Bible." Even <strong>the</strong> love <strong>of</strong> pure letters<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Renaissance gave way to <strong>the</strong> love <strong>of</strong> this book. It was <strong>in</strong> everybody's<br />

home, and its <strong>in</strong>fluence upon <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d and conscience <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> people<br />

was amaz<strong>in</strong>g. " A new conception <strong>of</strong> life and <strong>of</strong> man superseded <strong>the</strong> old."<br />

" Theology rules <strong>the</strong>re," said Grotius, speak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> England .'shortly after<br />

Elizabeth's death.<br />

A certa<strong>in</strong> gravity <strong>of</strong> demeanor disclosed itself even <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country gentlemen<br />

like our ancestors, whose diversions before this had been <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lighter<br />

sort, such as hawk<strong>in</strong>g, fenc<strong>in</strong>g and danc<strong>in</strong>g. The brilliancy <strong>of</strong> dress <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Renaissance disappeared. A more sober vestment characterized <strong>the</strong> Puritans,<br />

and an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g fondness for simplicity <strong>in</strong> all th<strong>in</strong>gs, but especially <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

forms <strong>of</strong> worship. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Puritans were undesirous <strong>of</strong> separat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>mselves<br />

from <strong>the</strong> Church <strong>of</strong> England, but <strong>the</strong>y attempted to "purify" it from<br />

with<strong>in</strong>, and to simplify its ritual, which rem<strong>in</strong>ded <strong>the</strong>m <strong>of</strong> popery. They<br />

refused to wear <strong>the</strong> surplice, to baptize with <strong>the</strong> sign <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cross, to bow at <strong>the</strong><br />

name <strong>of</strong> Jesus, to make use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> marriage ceremony, and to<br />

acknowledge <strong>the</strong> div<strong>in</strong>e authority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> episcopate.<br />

Elizabeth had tried <strong>in</strong> va<strong>in</strong> to force her people <strong>in</strong>to an acceptance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

church adm<strong>in</strong>istration that she prescribed, and had gone so far as to execute<br />

certa<strong>in</strong> non-conformists.<br />

Then came James, <strong>the</strong> hope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Puritans, but, although educated as a<br />

Presbyterian, upon his accession to <strong>the</strong> throne he "renounced <strong>the</strong> Calv<strong>in</strong>istic<br />

sympathies he had cherished <strong>in</strong> Scotland," and turned a deaf ear to <strong>the</strong> pleas<br />

<strong>of</strong> his Puritan subjects.<br />

It was about this time that <strong>the</strong> Separatist congregation at Scrooby<br />

succeeded <strong>in</strong> leav<strong>in</strong>g England, and settled for a brief while <strong>in</strong> Holland, whi<strong>the</strong>r<br />

a portion set sail for <strong>the</strong> New World <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mayflower, land<strong>in</strong>g at Plymouth,<br />

Dec. 21, 1620.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!