Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ...

Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ... Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ...

13.08.2013 Views

Ph w o I -^-d w is ft o ^^ o a 2^ « a „|I5 g5 S-S 1 I oi O §M§aigg s ^^ ^ .2 B «> g W^ S

Introduction xv Remarks on the Foregoing Copy of the Harleian MSS. The Holmestead or Olmestede family have not been found in Lancashire, but they did occupy lands belonging to the Duchy of Lancaster, i. e., Crown lands, in Essex. There is no Felsted Grange, but Felsted Barton formed part of the possessions of " Sion " alienated to Richard Rich, 17th March, 1537. Nicholas. There is a will recorded of a Nicholas Olmstede, 1578. James, supposed to be the ancestor of the emigrant. John Holmestead of Hawsted (Halsted) was master of the horse to Edward, 17th Earl of Oxford, called the "Spendthrift," and speculated largely in the lands which that nobleman alienated. John Olmestede had three daughters. Richard Holmested was the son of William Holmested, of St. Lawrence, County Essex. His wife's father, John Hawes, was also of St. Lawrence. Will of John Hawes is dated August 7, 1613, (see p. xiii). Thomas Holmested, minister at Kelvedon, was the son of John Olmsted of Felsted and Elizabeth Roo, his wife. His grandfather was William of Felsted. He leaves in his will, 1647, property situated in Felsted to brothers and kinsmen and nieces in Sawbrideworth, County Herts. EXTRACT FROM AN ADDRESS OF WELCOME By Prof. Everett Ward Olmsted, President of the Olmsted Family Association, Delivered at E. Hartford, Conn., June 20, 1912 In the northern part of the Parish of Bumpsted-Helion, in the County of Essex, England, stands a long, low, and very ancient house of stone and plaster, once moated round. This venerable manor, Olmsted Hall, now in the possession of Queen's College, Cambridge, is the oldest edifice in existence with which our family name is connected. It was originally held by one Martin of Olmsted, under the lordship of the famous de Vere family. In 1242 it was in the possession of Maurice of Olmsted. And so it passed down from father to son for several generations. By the early part of the fifteenth century, however, it had already passed out of the possession of those of the name into that of a knightly family called Skrene. Whether this was a family related by marriage with the house of Olmsted or not, it has been impossible to determine. It is not unlikely to have been the case, however. At all events, in 1474, this manor, together with other estates, came into the ownership of Wm. Lord Hastings, and nine years later, when he was beheaded and his property confiscated, Olmsted Hall passed into the hands of Elizabeth Woodville, widow of Edward IV, who was then endowing as second patroness Queen's College, Cambridge. Such, briefly, is the history of the old Hall as far as we know it. But what were the Olmsteds doing all this time since their ownership of the Hall had lapsed ? Are we to imagine that the family was extinct or inactive ? By no means. As their over-lords, the illustrious de Veres, were engaged about this time in the Wars of the Roses, in support of the Lancastrian cause, and as the Olmsteds of later generations have given ample proof of their courage and

Introduction xv<br />

Remarks on <strong>the</strong> Forego<strong>in</strong>g Copy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Harleian MSS.<br />

The Holmestead or Olmestede <strong>family</strong> have not been found <strong>in</strong> Lancashire,<br />

but <strong>the</strong>y did occupy lands belong<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Duchy <strong>of</strong> Lancaster, i. e., Crown<br />

lands, <strong>in</strong> Essex.<br />

There is no Felsted Grange, but Felsted Barton formed part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> possessions<br />

<strong>of</strong> " Sion " alienated to Richard Rich, 17th March, 1537.<br />

Nicholas. There is a will recorded <strong>of</strong> a Nicholas <strong>Olmsted</strong>e, 1578.<br />

James, supposed to be <strong>the</strong> ancestor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> emigrant.<br />

John Holmestead <strong>of</strong> Hawsted (Halsted) was master <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> horse to Edward,<br />

17th Earl <strong>of</strong> Oxford, called <strong>the</strong> "Spendthrift," and speculated largely <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> lands which that nobleman alienated. John Olmestede had three daughters.<br />

Richard Holmested was <strong>the</strong> son <strong>of</strong> William Holmested, <strong>of</strong> St. Lawrence,<br />

County Essex. His wife's fa<strong>the</strong>r, John Hawes, was also <strong>of</strong> St. Lawrence.<br />

Will <strong>of</strong> John Hawes is dated August 7, 1613, (see p. xiii).<br />

Thomas Holmested, m<strong>in</strong>ister at Kelvedon, was <strong>the</strong> son <strong>of</strong> John <strong>Olmsted</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> Felsted and Elizabeth Roo, his wife. His grandfa<strong>the</strong>r was William <strong>of</strong><br />

Felsted. He leaves <strong>in</strong> his will, 1647, property situated <strong>in</strong> Felsted to bro<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

and k<strong>in</strong>smen and nieces <strong>in</strong> Sawbrideworth, County Herts.<br />

EXTRACT FROM AN ADDRESS OF WELCOME<br />

By Pr<strong>of</strong>. Everett Ward <strong>Olmsted</strong>, President <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Olmsted</strong> Family Association,<br />

Delivered at E. Hartford, Conn., June 20, 1912<br />

In <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Parish <strong>of</strong> Bumpsted-Helion, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> County <strong>of</strong><br />

Essex, England, stands a long, low, and very ancient house <strong>of</strong> stone and<br />

plaster, once moated round. This venerable manor, <strong>Olmsted</strong> Hall, now <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> possession <strong>of</strong> Queen's College, Cambridge, is <strong>the</strong> oldest edifice <strong>in</strong> existence<br />

with which our <strong>family</strong> name is connected. It was orig<strong>in</strong>ally held by one<br />

Mart<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Olmsted</strong>, under <strong>the</strong> lordship <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> famous de Vere <strong>family</strong>. In<br />

1242 it was <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> possession <strong>of</strong> Maurice <strong>of</strong> <strong>Olmsted</strong>. And so it passed down<br />

from fa<strong>the</strong>r to son for several generations.<br />

By <strong>the</strong> early part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fifteenth century, however, it had already passed<br />

out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> possession <strong>of</strong> those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> name <strong>in</strong>to that <strong>of</strong> a knightly <strong>family</strong> called<br />

Skrene. Whe<strong>the</strong>r this was a <strong>family</strong> related by marriage with <strong>the</strong> house <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Olmsted</strong> or not, it has been impossible to determ<strong>in</strong>e. It is not unlikely to<br />

have been <strong>the</strong> case, however. At all events, <strong>in</strong> 1474, this manor, toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

with o<strong>the</strong>r estates, came <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> ownership <strong>of</strong> Wm. Lord Hast<strong>in</strong>gs, and n<strong>in</strong>e<br />

years later, when he was beheaded and his property confiscated, <strong>Olmsted</strong> Hall<br />

passed <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> hands <strong>of</strong> Elizabeth Woodville, widow <strong>of</strong> Edward IV, who was<br />

<strong>the</strong>n endow<strong>in</strong>g as second patroness Queen's College, Cambridge.<br />

Such, briefly, is <strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> old Hall as far as we know it. But<br />

what were <strong>the</strong> <strong>Olmsted</strong>s do<strong>in</strong>g all this time s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>ir ownership <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hall<br />

had lapsed ? Are we to imag<strong>in</strong>e that <strong>the</strong> <strong>family</strong> was ext<strong>in</strong>ct or <strong>in</strong>active ?<br />

By no means.<br />

As <strong>the</strong>ir over-lords, <strong>the</strong> illustrious de Veres, were engaged about this<br />

time <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Wars <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Roses, <strong>in</strong> support <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lancastrian cause, and as <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Olmsted</strong>s <strong>of</strong> later generations have given ample pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir courage and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!