13.08.2013 Views

Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ...

Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ...

Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

188 <strong>Olmsted</strong> Family <strong>Genealogy</strong><br />

Coates, Tenn payr <strong>of</strong> Stock<strong>in</strong>gs, Tenn Knifes, Tenn Hookes, Twenty Pipes,<br />

Tenn Muckes, and Tenn needles " comprised <strong>the</strong> western part <strong>of</strong> Norwalk. In<br />

a table <strong>of</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al grants <strong>of</strong> home lots to <strong>the</strong> first settlers <strong>of</strong> Norwalk, 1652,<br />

appears <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> Richard <strong>Olmsted</strong> and a description <strong>of</strong> his home lot: 4<br />

acres and 1 rood. Lots 15 and half <strong>of</strong> 17, with 219 acres commonage. In <strong>the</strong><br />

"estate <strong>of</strong> lands and accommodations " <strong>of</strong> Norwalk <strong>in</strong> 1655 he is credited<br />

with ^219.<br />

Mr. Selleck, <strong>in</strong> his History <strong>of</strong> Norwalk (p. 24), says: "It speaks well for <strong>the</strong><br />

new company's enterprise and loyalty that it was able to send its maiden<br />

delegate, Richard <strong>Olmsted</strong>, to Hartford, even as early as May, 1653."<br />

"To make it personal, it is recorded that <strong>the</strong> day after <strong>the</strong> Court sat, Richard<br />

<strong>Olmsted</strong> was appo<strong>in</strong>ted Sergeant, and deputed to 'exercise' <strong>the</strong> Norwalk<br />

soldiers and 'to exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong>ir arms.'<br />

"Richard <strong>Olmsted</strong> bore <strong>the</strong> test <strong>of</strong> power well, and his first year as Representative<br />

was supplemented by a ' dozen o<strong>the</strong>r sessions to 1679.' "<br />

Richard <strong>Olmsted</strong> must have been liv<strong>in</strong>g as late as July 8, 1686, for his<br />

name appears <strong>in</strong> a patent bear<strong>in</strong>g that date, by which patent <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al purchase<br />

<strong>of</strong> lands from <strong>the</strong> Indians for <strong>the</strong> site <strong>of</strong> Norwalk is confirmed by <strong>the</strong><br />

Governor and General Court <strong>of</strong> Connecticut.<br />

In 1646, Constable <strong>in</strong> Hartford.<br />

His Civil Services<br />

In 1649, Fence viewer <strong>in</strong> Hartford.<br />

In 1653, Deputy <strong>of</strong> Norwalk to <strong>the</strong> General Court at Hartford.<br />

In 1656, appo<strong>in</strong>ted by <strong>the</strong> General Court, Lea<strong>the</strong>r seller, for Norwalk.<br />

In 1657, chosen Townsman <strong>in</strong> Norwalk.<br />

May 19, 1659, appo<strong>in</strong>ted with three o<strong>the</strong>rs to settle a difficulty between <strong>the</strong><br />

towns <strong>of</strong> Stratford and Fairfield, with <strong>the</strong> Indians, relative to lands.<br />

May 17, 1660, he was appo<strong>in</strong>ted Grand Juror for Norwalk.<br />

Oct. 4, 1660, Deputy to <strong>the</strong> General Court at Hartford. He was chosen<br />

Deputy <strong>of</strong> Norwalk to <strong>the</strong> General Court a dozen times between 1660 and 1679.<br />

In 1664, " The Court appo<strong>in</strong>ted Mr. Campfield, Deacon More, Mr. Fayrechild,<br />

Mr. Hull and Lt. <strong>Olmsted</strong> a committee to ripen <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess respect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> Calf <strong>in</strong> controversie between Mr. Lord and Danl. Cone who returned that<br />

<strong>the</strong>y hav<strong>in</strong>g viewed <strong>the</strong> Sayd beast, and <strong>the</strong> evidences <strong>of</strong> both sides, doe judge<br />

it to be Mr. Lord's steare. The Court confirms this determ<strong>in</strong>ation that <strong>the</strong><br />

stear doth belong to Mr. Lord."<br />

At a General Court, held at Hartford, called by <strong>the</strong> Governor, July 6,<br />

1665, it was announced that <strong>the</strong> Court has been advised by his Majesty's<br />

order, that DeRuyter is likely to assault <strong>the</strong> Colonies, and that his Majesty<br />

had made known his pleasure that <strong>the</strong> Colonies should put <strong>the</strong>mselves <strong>in</strong> a<br />

posture <strong>of</strong> defense. The Court ordered that each plantation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Colony<br />

should consider some way to discover <strong>the</strong> approach <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> enemy, and appo<strong>in</strong>ted<br />

Committees, to act generally <strong>in</strong> this matter from each town.<br />

Lt. <strong>Olmsted</strong> appears on <strong>the</strong> Committee appo<strong>in</strong>ted to represent <strong>the</strong> Colony<br />

or that part between Stratford and Rye.<br />

Oct. 12, 1665, he was appo<strong>in</strong>ted to view <strong>the</strong> lands apperta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to Hast<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

and Rye, for a new plantation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!